Find a TenderOpen for tender Tender notice
Published 30 Sept 2026, 15:10 BST

Official UK procurement notice

BGWM Digital Transformation (Discovery Phase)

Authority: WEST MIDLANDS GROWTH COMPANY LIMITED (Public body)

ServicesBelow threshold - open competitionBelow threshold
Published estimate£100,000£120,000 inc. VAT
Submission deadline 26 Oct 202612:00 GMT · 24d 19h left
Contract term 6 mostarts 30 Nov 2026
Bids per lot · this authority 8all categories · n=8 · competition analysis ↓

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Business Growth West Midlands (BGWM) is the current West Midlands business support service and the primary digital entry point into the wider region's business support ecosystem. Delivered by West Midlands Growth Company (WMGC), through West Midlands Growth Hub, BGWM forms a vital part of the region's commitment to providing a "no wrong door" approach to business support.

As part of the new WMGC Growth Hub operating model, a new digital service is required to provide a seamless entry journey for all businesses while supporting clear routing, referral management, business intelligence capture and outcome tracking across the wider business support ecosystem. This may or may not be under the same brand.

Following a strategic review, WMGC has adopted a Hybrid Universal Front Door model for the business support digital service, which provides a consistent and high-quality entry experience for all businesses and quickly routes businesses to the most appropriate support while managing expectations around provision through clear positioning and tailored customer journeys.

While the future digital service will provide a universal entry point, universal access does not mean that every business will receive person-led support. The primary role of the service is to identify and enable the most appropriate next step for the business.

Read the full description (1,852 more characters)

Small, micro, pre-start and startup businesses will be supported through automated referrals to Local Enterprise Services, other local and national provision, plus curated digital content and tools. High-growth potential and strategic businesses will be identified through proportionate digital triage and transferred rapidly into person-led support through the High Growth Service and Strategic Account Management functions. The future digital service is intended not only to signpost businesses that are not yet eligible for person-led High Growth support to external provision, but also to operate as a regional digital support layer. It will help address common business needs directly through high-quality digital tools, guidance and tailored recommendations. These tailored resources would supplement evidenced gaps in provision and improve continuity rather than replicate support already available through local, regional, national or private-sector providers. The future digital service should be informed by recognised best practice from comparable business support ecosystems and digital service models. Discovery activity should assess existing market solutions and ensure any future service delivers clear additional value to businesses and stakeholders, avoiding unnecessary duplication of functionality, content, tools or services already available elsewhere.

To ensure future investment decisions are evidence-based and aligned to business needs, WMGC is seeking to appoint an experienced agency or consortium to undertake a comprehensive Discovery Phase that will validate user needs, test key assumptions underpinning the hybrid model, define service requirements, and develop a robust specification for future procurement and implementation.

This is an initial procurement associated with the first phase - Discovery - of this project.

CPV: Computer-site planning consultancy services · Systems consultancy services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · value published
Lot #1Lot 1 6 moPublished valueAED 100,000
Contract period: 30 Nov 2026 — 31 May 2027 (6 mo)Delivery: West MidlandsTurnover guideline: ~AED 200,000/yr≈ 2× annual value
Value
AED 100,000 exc. VAT · AED 120,000 inc. VAT
72130000 Computer-site planning consultancy services72246000 Systems consultancy services

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

What it takes to win
i

How this buyer will score bids.

The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).

Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published — the tender pack may add more
How bids are scored

80% Quality/ 20% Price

No conditions of participation were published on the notice; check the tender documents.

Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid

How WEST MIDLANDS GROWTH COMPANY LIMITED buys Systems analysis and programming services (CPV 7224) — and who usually turns up

WEST MIDLANDS GROWTH COMPANY LIMITED’s own published record, next to the West Midlands market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Systems analysis and programming services (CPV 7224) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Left: this authority. Right: the market where the work is delivered. Bids and award-vs-estimate pairs are per lot, from contested contracts only — direct awards (including PA 2023 transparency notices) report one bid by definition and are left out. On Procurement Act 2023 notices the count is the tenders assessed at the final stage, not every submission received; pairs compare like with like (VAT-exclusive, or VAT-inclusive on both sides). Empty means nothing was published, not filled in from elsewhere.

This authority

WEST MIDLANDS GROWTH COMPANY LIMITED

contract notices in 36 months: 1 in CPV 7224 · 4 in division 72 (1 route not published) · 24 in all categories (1 without competition · 2 route not published)

Bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for work like this.

Middle value of published bid counts, one per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 8 lots. 4 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 8) and 4 from older notices (bids received, middle 8).

Nothing is filled in from UK-wide numbers. An empty tile means nothing usable was published.

8all categories · 36m · n=8 lots
Single-bid lots
i

How often only one company bid.

Share of lots that received exactly one bid, on the same competitions as the bids figure.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 8 lots.

High means a thin market or an incumbent that is hard to beat.

0%all categories · 36m · n=8 lots
Award vs estimate
i

Do awards for work like this land above or below the estimate.

Estimate against award per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 11 pairs.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

1% belowall categories · 36m · n=11 pairs
Deadline → award date
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 2 notices. Small sample.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

23dall categories · 36m · n=2 notices
Notice updates
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 24 months: 41 notices.

Last 24 months.

0all categories · 24m · n=41 notices
Awarded without competition
i

How often this buyer awards without a competition.

Direct or limited awards as a share of its notices that say which procedure was used. These routes are legal in defined cases. This is just the record.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 72), last 36 months: 3 notices.

Last 36 months.

0%division 72 · 36m · n=3 notices
Bids per lot robust · n=8
i

How the number of bidders is spread across lots.

Each lot with a published bid count is put in a band: one bid, two to three, four to six, seven or more. Real competitions only.

Based on 8 lots on 5 contested notices · all categories, last 36 months.

  • 1 bid 0%
  • 2–3 13%
  • 4–6 25%
  • 7+ 63%

Middle value 8 · 8 lots on 5 contested notices · all categories.

Winning award vs estimate robust · n=11
i

How often winners come in below, near or above the estimate.

Each lot with both an estimate and an award is placed by how far the award sat from the estimate.

Based on 11 lot pairs · all categories, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

  • Below estimate 45%
  • Within ±2% 55%
  • Above estimate 0%

11 lot pairs · all categories.

The market · delivery region

West Midlands · Systems analysis and programming services (CPV 7224)

contract notices delivered in West Midlands in 36 months: 5 in CPV 7224 (3 competed, 1 route not published) · 556 in division 72 (243 competed, 135 route not published)

Bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for work like this.

Middle value of published bid counts, one per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 72), last 36 months: 111 lots. 78 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 4) and 33 from older notices (bids received, middle 5).

Nothing is filled in from UK-wide numbers. An empty tile means nothing usable was published.

4division 72 · 36m · n=111 lots
Single-bid lots
i

How often only one company bid.

Share of lots that received exactly one bid, on the same competitions as the bids figure.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 72), last 36 months: 111 lots.

High means a thin market or an incumbent that is hard to beat.

13%division 72 · 36m · n=111 lots
Award vs estimate
i

Do awards for work like this land above or below the estimate.

Estimate against award per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 72), last 36 months: 74 pairs.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

1% belowdivision 72 · 36m · n=74 pairs
Deadline → award date
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 72), last 36 months: 84 notices.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

64ddivision 72 · 36m · n=84 notices
SME bidders
i

How much of this market goes to small and medium firms.

SME bidders where buyers published the split, otherwise SME winners.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 72), last 36 months: 91 lots.

Last 36 months.

67%division 72 · 36m · n=91 lots
Winners based in the region
i

How much work like this goes to companies based in the delivery region.

Awards in this category delivered here where the winner’s registered address is in the region.

Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7224), last 36 months: 3 awards.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

100%CPV 7224 · 36m · n=3 awards
Bids per lot robust · n=111
i

How the number of bidders is spread across lots.

Each lot with a published bid count is put in a band: one bid, two to three, four to six, seven or more. Real competitions only.

Based on 111 lots on 106 contested notices · division 72, last 36 months.

  • 1 bid 13%
  • 2–3 28%
  • 4–6 30%
  • 7+ 30%

Middle value 4 · 111 lots on 106 contested notices · division 72.

Winning award vs estimate robust · n=74
i

How often winners come in below, near or above the estimate.

Each lot with both an estimate and an award is placed by how far the award sat from the estimate.

Based on 74 lot pairs · division 72, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

  • Below estimate 45%
  • Within ±2% 38%
  • Above estimate 18%

74 lot pairs · division 72.

robust · n=11
i

Where this tender’s estimate would land if the usual pattern repeats.

We apply the buyer’s usual movement between estimate and award (or the region’s) to the estimate on this notice.

Based on this buyer’s own usual movement over 11 lots (all categories), applied to the £100,000 estimate on this notice.

A benchmark, not a price to bid.

The middle award in WEST MIDLANDS GROWTH COMPANY LIMITED (all categories, n=11 pairs) lands 1% below: on this notice’s £100,000 that is about £99,000. Context for a bid, not a recommended price.
2

Who you are likely to meet
i

Who you may be up against.

Suppliers on this buyer’s earlier similar contracts, and suppliers whose record fits this tender.

A guess from the record. Buyers do not publish who is bidding.

Suppliers on this authority’s earlier similar contracts, then suppliers with a matching track record — from published award history, not a bid list

Suppliers with a similar track record — and how they price
i

Suppliers with a similar track record, and how they price.

Suppliers matched on wins in this category, history with this buyer, location and size. Their award vs estimate is from their own past wins.

A guess from the record, not a bidder list.

SupplierEvidenceLast awardTheir award vs estimateRelevance
GeoSmart Information Ltd SME3 class wins5 months agono comparable pairs58%
Stephen Buss Environmental Consulting Ltd SME3 class wins5 months agono comparable pairs58%
Groundwater Modelling Solutions Ltd SME3 class wins5 months agono comparable pairs58%
Groundwater Science Ltd SME3 class wins5 months agono comparable pairs57%
Geoff Parkin Hydro Ltd SME3 class wins5 months agono comparable pairs53%

Matched by the nightly worker on class wins, buyer history, delivery geography, scale and notice text; relevance is a 0–100% heuristic score, not a probability of bidding. “Their award vs estimate” is that supplier’s middle value on its own comparable single-supplier wins, CPV 7224 first. Nobody here is known to be bidding.

Coverage and what to read with care
  • Each tile explains itself. The on a figure says what it is, how it is counted and which scope this notice’s own record came from (class, division, all categories, or the authority’s 24-month row). The two columns are never blended and nothing is filled from a UK-wide figure; an empty tile means the source published nothing usable. Long form: Methodology.
  • Coverage. Roughly 40 % of notices publish a bid count; about half publish an ITL1 delivery location, so the market column reads the authority’s registered region when the notice has none (labelled). About 30 % of award-vs-estimate pairs are exact matches — the buyer published the award at the estimate. n is on every figure; a thin sample is muted, never hidden.
  • “Match” and “relevance” are model scores from the nightly matcher, not published facts. Find a Tender does not publish who is bidding. Never shown: contact details, payment behaviour, or a recommended price.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Procedure method
Below threshold - open competition
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Open for tender
Procurement threshold
Below threshold
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
No (one-off requirement)
First published
30 Sept 2026, 15:10 BST
Last source update
30 Sept 2026, 15:10 BST
Authority reference
2026-WMGC-0782
Latest notice
Tender notice (UK4)
Classification (CPV)
Computer-site planning consultancy servicesSystems consultancy services
Delivery area
West Midlands (UKG3)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-077dcc Find a Tender

How to participate & submission route

Official notice Submit via In-tend
Submission portal named on this notice: In-tend · Who buys & how to bid on In-tend
Supplier login requiredElectronic submission allowed
Access & registration note: Free · one account per buying organisation's portal · reCAPTCHA on signup
Expression of interest (EOI)
—
Tender submission deadline
26 Oct 2026, 12:00 GMT
Clarification deadline
—
Submission channel
Official e-sourcing portal
Electronic submission
Allowed
Detailed submission instructions & authority contactsFrom official release
Published estimate £100,000 excludes VAT (£120,000 including VAT).

Timeline

3 published dates · Europe/London
  1. Tender notice published1 day ago
    30 Sept 2026, 15:10 BST
  2. Submission deadlinein 25 days
    26 Oct 2026, 12:00 GMT
  3. Contract startsin 59 days
    30 Nov 2026, 00:00 GMT

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Nothing awarded yet
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Tender notice published
    30 Sept 2026, 15:10 BSTUK4

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

WEST MIDLANDS GROWTH COMPANY LIMITED

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-COH: 01631329 11th Floor The Colmore Building, Birmingham, West Midlands, B4 6AT [email protected]

Official documents & specifications (2)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Tender pack and attachments

Notices published for this procedure

  • Tender notice tenderTender noticeUK4Tender notice on Find a Tender