Official UK procurement notice
Project Integrator Services Framework
Authority: HS1 Ltd (t/a London St. Pancras Highspeed) (Public body)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionHS1 Ltd trading as London St. Pancras Highspeed (LSPH) is looking to procure a portfolio wide Project Integrator Framework to support across all business departments. The Project Integrator operate in a strategic arrangement with LSPH being the asset owner and will be responsible for supporting the development and delivery of LSPH’s project requirements, providing a wide range of skills, experience and capabilities aligned to project-specific objectives and defined value outcomes. The Project Integrator consultants will also be working closely with the Route/Station operators, and maintainers, to manage the successful development and delivery of the Control Period outputs, promises and Concession Agreement obligations. This will be achieved through assisting LSPH in achieving its Mission & Values, by proposing and providing experienced and capable staff resources as defined for each project. Each call-off from the Framework will be scalable to the project’s individual needs. This may include all services for; all stages of the project from Bluesky to Project Closure; all services for a specific Gate; specific services spanning across several Gates; or only one service for a specific Gate where specialist resource is required. Based on each call off scope the Project Integrator may be requested to manage and facilitate all associated roles, services, sub-consultant appointments and surveys teams to fully deliver the required scope and outcome. The Project Integrator will not undertake the role of Principal Contractor. LSPH will award and sign all Principal Contractor contracts directly.
- How the procedure runs: All communication relating to this procedure will be managed via LSPH's procurement portal. Full process details are in Attachment 1, provided as part of this call for competition. A brief summary is given below: Stage 1 - Call for competition / PSQ - LSPH publish this initial call for competition with a PSQ (Procurement Specific Questionnaire), including conditions of participation. - Interested parties confirm their interest by submitting their completed response to the PSQ by the deadline provided. - LSPH assess all PSQ responses submitted and create a shortlist of up to 5 tenderers to be taken forward to Stage 2 (the ITT). All interested parties will be notified by LSPH as to whether or not they have been successful at this stage. Stage 2 - ITT - ITT issued to the successful shortlisted tenderers from Stage 1 - Tenderers submit any questions / clarifications regarding the tender - LSPH respond to questions / clarifications - Tenderers submit their completed tenders - LSPH assess tender submissions and create a shortlist of 3 tenderers to be invited to proceed to the 'Presentation / Q&A' stage, to be held at LSPH's office in London. - Final post-presentations evaluation carried out by LSPH to select preferred supplier. - Notification of intention to award will be issued by LSPH. Standstill period commences. - Once standstill period ends, contract finalised and executed with successful tenderer. Please note that the 'Enquiry Deadline' stated in the 'Submission' section, refers to questions / clarifications that are submitted in Stage 2 (ITT) by tenderers that make it through to Stage 2 (the ITT), having been shortlisted after Stage 1. The draft form of contract will follow under separate cover within a week of this tender going live
CPV: Advisory architectural services · Architectural and building-surveying services · Architectural and related services · Architectural design services · Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services · Building consultancy services · Business analysis consultancy services · Business and management consultancy and related services · Business and management consultancy services · Civil engineering consultancy services · Computer-aided design (CAD) software development services · Computer-aided design (CAD) software package · +34 more
How this framework works
From the published notice- Type
- Open framework
- Call-offs
- every call-off is a further competition among the appointed suppliers
- Places
- up to 3 suppliers
- Framework period
- 5 yrs · up to 7 yrs from 19 Apr 2027
Who may buy through it
None
Published description of the framework
As set out in the tender documentation via the Portal
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · value publishedLot #1RenewalPublished value£40,000,000
- Economic & financial standing
Details provided within the tender documentation via the Portal
- Technical & professional ability
Details provided within the tender documentation via the Portal
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Published sub-criteria (2)
- Stage 2 - ITT Scored Questions: 70%
- Price: 30%
Published award criteria (2)
- Stage 2 - ITT Scored Questions: Questions to be scored will be made available to tenderers that are shortlisted at the end of the Stage 1 PSQ. All questions and their respective weighting will be made available at the ITT stage for all shortlisted tenderers.
- Price: The maximum mark available for Price will be 30%. This mark will be awarded to the lowest cost Potential Provider. Remaining Potential Providers will receive a mark out of this maximum mark on a pro rata basis dependent on how far they deviate from the lowest price.
- Economic & financial standing
Details provided within the tender documentation via the Portal
- Technical & professional ability
Details provided within the tender documentation via the Portal
- Price carries 30 of 100 points: a 10% discount moves about 3 points. The method statement decides this lot, not the discount.
- “Project Integrator Services Framework” is a framework: the contest is a place on its panel, up to 3 suppliers, not a single contract: each call-off is a further competition, so the pricing contest starts after appointment.
Price arithmetic assumes straight proportional scoring; the tender pack may use another formula.
Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid
How HS1 Ltd (t/a London St. Pancras Highspeed) buys Consultative engineering and construction services (CPV 7131), and who usually turns up
HS1 Ltd (t/a London St. Pancras Highspeed) has little published record in this market. Compared with other frameworks and DPS only. Whole-market view: Consultative engineering and construction services (CPV 7131) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Across this market, small firms won 28% of awards with a known supplier size.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in Greater London.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Across this market, 58% of winners were registered in the delivery region.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 113 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Across this market, at least 20% of awarded procurements had no recorded rival.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid2%
2–314%
4–630%
7+54%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
On a framework or DPS, prices are agreed when work is called off.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Not comparable on a framework or DPS: the price is set later, on each call-off.
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 4523Published estimate£40m
This lot is listed as CPV 4523. The table above uses the notice category.
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid3%
2–326%
4–619%
7+53%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
| Supplier | This buyer’s earlier contract | Lot | Award value | Why listed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC)Worked for this buyer | European Traffic Management System (ERTMS) Early Works - Stage 2 (Develop) Support Servicesruns to Apr 2027 | — | — | Similar wording and category |
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
WSP UK LimitedLarge | £487m125 awards in 36m · last this month | 51 live · £411m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=17 |
Jacobs UK LtdLarge | £355m53 awards in 36m · last this month | 16 live · £55m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=12 |
AECOM LIMITEDLarge | £58m128 awards in 36m · last this month | 29 live · £38m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 8% below n=26 |
Mott MacDonaldLarge | £72m86 awards in 36m · last 1 month ago | 15 live · £40m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 11% below n=19 |
| £31m16 awards in 36m · last this month | 8 live · £27m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 10% below n=5 |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Competitive flexible procedure
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Open admission
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Utilities
- Commercial structure
- Framework agreement
- Who may use this agreement
- None
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 29 Oct 2026, 16:04 GMT
- Last source update
- 29 Oct 2026, 16:04 GMT
- Award evaluation window
- Submission end – 23 Mar 2027
- Authority reference
LSPH-OPS-2026-14- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-102811- Latest notice
- Tender notice (UK4)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0793f4Find a Tender
- How it runs
All communication relating to this procedure will be managed via LSPH's procurement portal. Full process details are in Attachment 1, provided as part of this call for competition. A brief summary is given below: Stage 1 - Call for competition / PSQ - LSPH publish this initial call for competition with a PSQ (Procurement Specific Questionnaire), including conditions of participation. - Interested parties confirm their interest by submitting their completed response to the PSQ by the deadline provided. - LSPH assess all PSQ responses submitted and create a shortlist of up to 5 tenderers to be taken forward to Stage 2 (the ITT). All interested parties will be notified by LSPH as to whether or not they have been successful at this stage. Stage 2 - ITT - ITT issued to the successful shortlisted tenderers from Stage 1 - Tenderers submit any questions / clarifications regarding the tender - LSPH respond to questions / clarifications - Tenderers submit their completed tenders - LSPH assess tender submissions and create a shortlist of 3 tenderers to be invited to proceed to the 'Presentation / Q&A' stage, to be held at LSPH's office in London. - Final post-presentations evaluation carried out by LSPH to select preferred supplier. - Notification of intention to award will be issued by LSPH. Standstill period commences. - Once standstill period ends, contract finalised and executed with successful tenderer. Please note that the 'Enquiry Deadline' stated in the 'Submission' section, refers to questions / clarifications that are submitted in Stage 2 (ITT) by tenderers that make it through to Stage 2 (the ITT), having been shortlisted after Stage 1. The draft form of contract will follow under separate cover within a week of this tender going live
How to participate & submission route
Official notice Apply via EU-Supply (CTM)- Requests to participate (first stage)
- —
- Appointment period ends
- 9 Mar 2027, 12:00 GMT
- Clarification deadline
- 17 Nov 2026, 17:30 GMT
- Submission channel
- Official e-sourcing portal
- Electronic submission
- Allowed
- Accepted languages
- en
Timeline
29 Oct 2026 → 19 Apr 2027 · 5 dates- Tender notice published7h ago29 Oct 2026, 16:04 GMT
- Today29 Oct 2026
- Clarification questions byin 18 days17 Nov 2026, 17:30 GMT
- Admission / appointment period endsin 130 days · period end, not a bid countdown9 Mar 2027, 12:00 GMT
- Award decision expected byin 145 days23 Mar 2027, 23:59 GMT
- Contract startsin 171 days19 Apr 2027
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Tender notice published29 Oct 2026, 16:04 GMTUK4
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Nothing awarded yet- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (2)
Official links; attachments are not copiedTender pack and attachments
- Bidding documents and specificationsAccess: The tender documentation will be available via our Portal for all tenderers to view and download
Notices published for this procedure
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender