Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 20 Jan 2026, 11:37 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

Preliminary Market Engagement - MBGWS Boxes

Authority: Sellafield Limited (Public body)

GoodsAbove thresholdSME suitable
Planned pipeline value£12,000,000pipeline notice, not a live tender · 1 value update
Tender notice expected 1 Nov 2026from the planned procurement notice
Contract term 5 yrsends 30 Sept 2033 · starts 1 Oct 2028

What is being bought

Published requirement description

This notice builds on the previous Preliminary Market Engagement (UK2 Notice reference: 004728-2026), published on 20 January 2026, which sought to assess supplier capability and market interest in the manufacture and supply of Miscellaneous Beta Gamma Waste (MBGW) Boxes.

That engagement demonstrated a strong level of market interest and identified a number of capable suppliers. Sellafield Ltd is now undertaking a further phase of market engagement to refine its understanding of supplier capacity, mobilisation requirements, and commercial considerations in advance of finalising the procurement strategy.

The current preferred delivery model is for the full assembly of MBGW Boxes by a single supplier. This engagement is intended to gather targeted feedback to validate this approach and inform the design of the forthcoming procurement.

The requirement is expected to include the manufacture, assembly, testing, and delivery of Miscellaneous Beta Gamma Waste (MBGW) Boxes in accordance with Sellafield Ltd specifications and requirements.

The anticipated demand profile remains within a range of approximately 11 to 33 units per annum, subject to confirmation.

PLEASE NOTE THIS IS NOT A CALL FOR COMPETITION

CPV: Packaging of intermediate level nuclear waste · Steel

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1Planned 5 yrsSME
Contract period: 1 Oct 2028 – 30 Sept 2033 (5 yrs)
Delivery: UKEligibility: SME eligible

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Sellafield Limited buys Radioactive-, toxic-, medical- and hazardous waste services (CPV 9052), and who usually turns up

Sellafield Limited’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Radioactive-, toxic-, medical- and hazardous waste services (CPV 9052) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerSellafield Limited · division 90
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 0 of 6 known-size awards · market: CPV 9052 · UK-wide, n=56
0%23%

No small-firm winners recorded among this authority’s published awards in this sample.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 2 of 5 known-location awards · market: CPV 9052 · UK-wide, n=49
40%37%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered outside the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: CPV 9052 · UK-wide, n=21
—62 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 62 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: exactly 2 of 3 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 9052 · UK-wide, n=77
2 of 356%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer6 lots with bid counts · broad CPV 90
17% had one bid
The market27 lots with bid counts · CPV 9052 · UK-wide
26% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid17% / 26%
Buyer: 1 of 6 lots with published bid counts. Market: 7 of 27 lots with published bid counts.
2–317% / 56%
Buyer: 1 of 6 lots with published bid counts. Market: 15 of 27 lots with published bid counts.
4–650% / 15%
Buyer: 3 of 6 lots with published bid counts. Market: 4 of 27 lots with published bid counts.
7+17% / 4%
Buyer: 1 of 6 lots with published bid counts. Market: 1 of 27 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyerToo few to chart: 1 lot with estimate and award, 5 needed · broad CPV 90
The market16 lots with estimate and award · CPV 9052 · UK-wide
63% below estimate
Market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate63%
Market: 10 of 16 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%31%
Market: 5 of 16 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate6%
Market: 1 of 16 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 905260 monthsSME suitablePublished estimate£12m
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 27 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet26% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 27 similar lots
1 bid26%
7 of 27 similar past lots received 1 bid (26%).
2–356%
15 of 27 similar past lots received 2–3 (56%).
4–615%
4 of 27 similar past lots received 4–6 (15%).
7+4%
1 of 27 similar past lots received 7+ (4%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 2 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £12m, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Goods
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
20 Jan 2026, 11:37 GMT
Last source update
29 May 2026, 15:04 BST
Authority reference
C31446
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-050919
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Packaging of intermediate level nuclear wasteSteel
Delivery area
UK
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0609b7 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

20 Jan 2026 → 1 Oct 2028 · 5 dates
  1. Planning notice published278 days ago
    20 Jan 2026, 11:37 GMT
  2. Latest notice published148 days ago
    29 May 2026, 15:04 BST
  3. Market engagement134 days ago
    12 Jun 2026, 23:59 BST

    Responding to the Expression of Interest

    To respond to this expression of interest, interested parties should respond in the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) tendering portal Atamis atamis-2464.my.site.com/s/Welcome ↗

    To access Click on View our Live Opportunities and search for C31446.

    Purpose of Engagement

    Sellafield Ltd is seeking to:

    -Confirm the attractiveness of a full assembly (single supplier) delivery model

    -Understand supplier mobilisation requirements and constraints

    -Assess whether proposed delivery timelines are achievable

    -Validate whether the anticipated volume range is commercially attractive

    Suppliers are invited to provide responses to the following questions:

    1. Full Assembly Model

    Based on the information available, would your organisation consider a full assembly (single supplier) model to be an attractive opportunity?

    Please set out any conditions or factors that would influence your interest.

    1. Mobilisation Period

    What mobilisation period would your organisation typically require for a requirement of this nature?

    Please outline the key activities that would drive this timeline (e.g. tooling, design validation, supply chain, recruitment, approvals).

    1. 18-Month Mobilisation Feasibility

    Do you consider an 18-month mobilisation period to be sufficient to establish capability and commence compliant production?

    Please provide supporting rationale.

    If not, please indicate what mobilisation period you would consider achievable.

    1. Volume and Demand Profile

    Is the anticipated volume range (circa 11–33 units per annum) considered commercially attractive?

    Please provide any comments on minimum viable volumes, batching, or production considerations.

    1. Product Introduction Approach and Experience

    What experience does your organisation have in introducing new or technically complex products into production?

    Please outline any structured approaches or methodologies (e.g. New Product Introduction (NPI), Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP), or similar) that you typically use, and how these support mobilisation and transition into production.

    1. Additional Comments

    Please provide any additional observations that may help inform the procurement strategy, including risk areas or key considerations.

    Interested parties should respond to this by 12 June 2026.

  4. Today
    25 Oct 2026
  5. Tender notice expectedin 8 days
    1 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT
  6. Contract starts
    1 Oct 2028, 00:00 BST

Notice history

3 events · 2 releases on Find a Tender · since 20 Jan 2026
  1. Pipeline notice published
    20 Jan 2026, 11:37 GMT
    UK1
  2. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    29 May 2026, 15:04 BST
    UK2
  3. Published value published: £12,000,000
    29 May 2026, 15:04 BST

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Sellafield Limited

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PWYP-8439-MZWY Hinton House, Birchwood Park Avenue, Warrington, North West, WA3 6GRContact name, email

Official documents & specifications (2)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure