Find a TenderPlanned procurement
Published 7 Jan 2026, 14:02 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

Outsourced nuclear medicine scans

Authority: Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (Central government)

Services
Planned pipeline value£52,500pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 19 Jan 2026from the planned procurement notice

What is being bought

Published requirement description

This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The provision of nuclear medicine scans – particularly in relation to SLNB scan

CPV: Health services · Hospital services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1Content of notice of intention to award to the existing provider under Direct Award…Planned

Content of notice of intention to award to the existing provider under Direct Award Process C<br/><br/>1. A statement that the relevant authority is intending to award a contract to an existing provider following Direct Award Process C.<br/><br/>This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intention to award notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Procurement Act 2023 do not apply to this award. The publication of this notice marks the start of the standstill period. Representations by providers must be made to decision makers by 19th January 2026. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intention to award under the PSR<br/><br/><br/>2.The contract title and reference.<br/><br/>Title: Outsourced nuclear medicine scans<br/><br/>3.The name and address of the registered office or principal place of business of the provider to whom an award is to be made.<br/><br/>KIMS Hospital<br/>Newnham Ct Way, Weavering, Maidstone ME14 5FT<br/><br/>4.A description of the relevant health care services to which the contract relates, including the most relevant CPV code<br/><br/>Description – Health services<br/>CPV Code – 85111000-0 – Hospital Services<br/><br/>5.The approximate lifetime value of the contract.<br/><br/>£52,500 (36 months)<br/><br/><br/>6.Details of the award decision-makers.<br/><br/>Key Individual – Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust<br/><br/>Radiology Services Manager<br/><br/><br/>7.A statement explaining the award decision-makers’ reasons for selecting the chosen provider, with reference to the key criteria.<br/><br/>Key Criteria:<br/>1. Quality and Innovation – Kims Hospital is in a convenient location for Kent ICB patients and has a track record of providing service to a good quality. Queen Victoria Hospital has limited local options and uses other facilities for nuclear medicine<br/>2. Value – They have consistently over a period of time delivered a valuable service within the available budget allocation.<br/>3. Integration, collaboration, and service sustainability – The procurement of this contract aims to secure the continuity of service.<br/>4. Improving access, reducing health inequalities, and facilitating choice – Kims Hospital offers Queen Victoria Hospital an existing established option patients.<br/>5. Social Value – The Provider uses local workforce to add to their social value to provide support to reducing waiting lists<br/><br/>8.Any declared conflicts or potential conflicts of interest.<br/><br/><br/>None declared<br/><br/>9.Information as to how any conflicts or potential conflicts of interest were managed.<br/><br/>None

Delivery: South East

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust buys Health services (CPV 8510), and who usually turns up

Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Health services (CPV 8510) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bidWhat to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 1 of 7 known-size awards · market: CPV 8510 · South East England, n=180
14%44%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Here, local means registered in South East England.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 1 of 1 known-location awards · market: CPV 8510 · South East England, n=280
1 of 163%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in South East England.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: CPV 8510 · UK-wide, n=92
—59 days

Half of these awards were announced within 59 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: exactly 6 of 7 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 8510 · South East England, n=238
86%80%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer5 lots with bid counts · all categories
0% had one bid
The market42 lots with bid counts · CPV 8510 · South East England
17% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid0% / 17%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 7 of 42 lots with published bid counts.
2–340% / 12%
Buyer: 2 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 5 of 42 lots with published bid counts.
4–620% / 40%
Buyer: 1 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 17 of 42 lots with published bid counts.
7+40% / 31%
Buyer: 2 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 13 of 42 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer1 lot with estimate and award · all categories · too few to chart
The market25 lots with estimate and award · CPV 8510 · South East England
20% below estimate
Market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate20%
Market: 5 of 25 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%76%
Market: 19 of 25 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate4%
Market: 1 of 25 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1Content of notice of intention to award to the existing provider under Direct Award…CPV 8510Published estimate£53k
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 42 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet17% single-bid risk
Past bids on 42 similar lots
1 bid17%
7 of 42 similar past lots received 1 bid (17%).
2–312%
5 of 42 similar past lots received 2–3 (12%).
4–640%
17 of 42 similar past lots received 4–6 (40%).
7+31%
13 of 42 similar past lots received 7+ (31%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4.5 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £53k, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Unspecified in notice
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
7 Jan 2026, 14:02 GMT
Last source update
7 Jan 2026, 14:02 GMT
Authority reference
C408792
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-001093
Classification (CPV)
Health servicesHospital services
Delivery area
South East (UKJ2)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06010c Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Run through: portal not identified

Tender documents are also served through a separate tool: https://atamis-1928.my.site.com/s/Welcome ↗

Submission deadline
—

Timeline

7 Jan 2026 → 19 Jan 2026 · 2 dates
  1. Notice published287 days ago
    7 Jan 2026, 14:02 GMT
  2. Tender notice expected276 days ago
    19 Jan 2026

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Queen Victoria Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Contracting authorityCentral GovernmentBody governed by public lawHealth Holtye Road, East Grinstead, South East, RH19 3DZContact name, email

Official documents & specifications

Official links; attachments are not copied

No document links were published on the notice.