Find a Tender
complete
Official procurement procedure
NKDC Leisure Management Services
Recreational
cultural and sporting services
Published value
Not published
Submission deadline Not published
Lots published1
Procurement Executive Summary
AI & Search Synopsis
Generated from official OCDS record
Tenderline Synopsis: North Kesteven District Council: "NKDC Leisure Management Services". Published status: complete. Published value: Value not published. 1 published lot. Submission deadline not published. See the official notice for participation instructions.
| Contracting Authority | North Kesteven District Council | Scope & Categories | Not published | Submission Window | complete No deadline published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Submission Gateway | Direct notice route | Legal Basis & Regime | Standard procurement | Estimated Value (exc. VAT) | Not published |
Bidder Intelligence · Authority Profile: North Kesteven District Council
Market Analytics
Derived from OCDS awards & bid statistics
Published history for North Kesteven District Council. These figures describe retained records, not a forecast of bids or a measure of buyer bias.
Published-to-award variance
Not availableInsufficient comparable data
Competition Density
2.9Bids / Report
Supplier ConcentrationNo estimate
Insufficient attributable awardsNo concentration estimate availablePayment Terms
Check noticePublished terms
Coverage: 15 active published awards; 14 bid reports (which may be per lot). Supplier values exclude multi-supplier awards, frameworks and DPS, and use GBP only. They are published award values, not payments. Published-to-award variance compares single-lot, single-award, single-supplier GBP procedures with explicitly non-framework/non-DPS status; increases remain in the average. Unpublished data stays unknown. Awarded suppliers are winners, not all bidders.
Procedure terms
Contracting AuthorityNorth Kesteven District Council | Procedure methodNot published | Procurement categoryNot published |
Statuscomplete | Framework / DPSNot published | CompetitionNot published |
Above thresholdNot published | Legal basisNot published | Tender period startsNot published |
Clarification deadlineNot published | Electronic submissionNot published | Submission languagesNot published |
Published14 Oct 2024, 11:35 BST | Last source update14 Oct 2024, 11:35 BST | Recurring procurementNot published |
ClassificationRecreational, cultural and sporting services | ||
Delivery area | ||
OCIDocds-h6vhtk-04abb2 | ||
What is being bought
Lot 1 - Sports and Physical Activity Services
Lot 2 - Natural World Centre - Whisby Nature Park
Lot 3 - Countryside Services
What changed
From the official release history
- Status changed to complete
14 Oct 2024, 11:35 BST - Official notice release published
14 Oct 2024, 11:35 BST - Buyer information updated
14 Oct 2024, 11:35 BST
Lots and requirements (1)
Published by the contracting authority
- Lot 1 · #1Individual lot title not publishedStatus not publishedPublished valueNot publishedSports and Physical Activity Services via agency agreement.Contract periodNot publishedEligibilityNot publishedOptions / renewalNot published
Timeline
- Procedure published
14 Oct 2024, 11:35 BST - Award active
Not published · Not published - Contract active
Signed 14 Oct 2024, 00:00 BST · £1,376,734
Commercial outcome and competition
Awards Greenwich Leisure Ltd Not published · Not published · active |
Contracts Contract £1,376,734 · signed 14 Oct 2024, 00:00 BST · active |
Bid statisticsNo aggregate bid statistics published |
Buyer and organisations in this procedure
North Kesteven District Council
Contracting authority GB-FTS-3225Documents (0)
Official links; attachments are not copied
No linked documents are published
Related procedures (0)
No related procedures published
Planning and rationale
Planning budgetNot published |
No-engagement rationaleNot published |
Procedure rationaleThe manner of exercising the powers
4.3 There are restrictions on these powers. Section 2(3) of the LA 2011 prevents a local
authority from using the general power to make or alter:
4.3.1 arrangements for the discharge of a local authority's functions by committees,
joint committees, another authority, or an officer under Part 6 of the Local
Government Act 1972;
4.3.2 arrangements for local authority governance in England under Part 1A of the
Local Government Act 2000 (as inserted by the LA 2011); or
4.3.3 any other contracting-out arrangements, or other arrangements that authorise a
person to exercise a function of a local authority.
4.4 The effect of these provisions, particularly the provision described at paragraph 4.3.3, is that
NKDC cannot enter into a contract which divests the authority of its statutory powers or
obliges the authority not to exercise its powers. This means that the varied contract
establishing the Agency Model should not be capable of being interpreted as a delegation
of power. It must be a genuine agency relationship.
THL.164904104.3 6 LPS.108654.00001
4.5 An agent is a tool through which the principal acts, without any loss of control or direction.
A delegate exercises a degree of discretion in performing the functions of the delegator on
its behalf.
4.6 Provided that the amended contract establishes a genuine agency model, our view is that
NKDC would not be acting outside of its vires by engaging GLL as its agent to provide leisure
services. There is supporting case law for this point, which sets out that a genuine agency
arrangement will not be a delegation of power:
"The general principle is that when a statute gives someone the right to invoke some legal
procedure by giving a notice or taking some other formal step, he may either do so in person
or authorise someone else to do it on his behalf." (General Legal Council ex parte Whitter v
Frankson [2006] UKPC 42 (per Lord Hoffmann at [4]).)
4.7 It will be vital that the amended contract not only refers to GLL as NKDC's agent, but also
ensures that this is reflected in the substance of GLL's obligations, i.e. the degree of control
that NKDC retains and the scope of discretion that GLL is given to deliver the services. We
would be happy to assist with this point.
4.8 Provided that a delegation of power is avoided, our view is that NKDC has the power to
enter into the Agency Model. |