Official UK procurement notice
NHS Talking Therapies British Sign Language (BSL)
Authority: Hertfordshire County Council (Local council)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionIt is the intention to award a contract using the Most Suitable Provider (MSP) process under the Provider Selection Regime for the provision of NHS Talking Therapies British Sign Language (BSL).
If you wish to be considered as a potential provider and can meet the mandatory requirements with the ability to deliver the required services stated in Section II.2.4, please email [email protected] by no later than 12pm on Monday 23rd March 2026
CPV: Health services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1Service Overview:Planned
Service Overview:
To support up to 21 Deaf Hertfordshire residents for 2025/26, and expected to support 16 Deaf Hertfordshire residents for 26/27 with British Sign Language (BSL) NHS Talking Therapies. These figures are based on the expectation that the 25/26 funding can be accrued at year-end. If the accrual is not possible, the stated numbers may require a minor adjustment.
The Provider must deliver both face‑to‑face and online sessions based on Service User need, ensuring confidential clinical space and suitably trained practitioners.
Quality and KPIs:
The Service must comply with the NHS Talking Therapies Manual and NICE guidance, including stepped-care delivery, appropriate session dosage, accredited clinicians, and provision of BSL-accessible digital self‑help tools to support post‑discharge recovery.
Monthly KPI monitoring by IHCCT will require:
- At least 48% reliable improvement
- At least 67% reliable recovery
- 75% starting treatment within 6 weeks
- 95% starting treatment within 18 weeks
NICE and NHS TT Compliance:
The Service must fully align with NICE Depression in Adults Guideline NG222, ensuring accessible and culturally competent assessment and treatment for Deaf BSL users. This includes comprehensive assessments, adapted outcome measures, equitable access and delivery of Counselling for Depression, CBT‑based guided self‑help, behavioural activation and relapse‑prevention in BSL. Treatment must involve shared decision‑making and meet the same quality standards as for hearing populations.
The Service must also comply with the NHS Talking Therapies Manual (v7, 2024) requirements for evidence‑based interventions, accredited practitioners, appropriate supervision and mandatory session‑by‑session outcomes. Digital tools must be secure, clinically appropriate and fully BSL-accessible.
Therapeutic Interventions:
The Provider must offer: facilitated cCBT, Step 2 PWP interventions, High‑Intensity CBT, Counselling for Depression, EMDR, IPT and Counselling for Couples. Expected delivery includes an average of 6 sessions at Step 2 and 12 sessions at Step 3, with caseload split approximately 65-70% Step 2 and 30-35% Step 3.
Workforce Requirements:
The workforce must be accredited, have full safeguarding governance, be able to deliver BSL Talking Therapies and accept both self‑referrals and professional referrals. Therapists must be fluent BSL users (minimum CACDP Level 6). Required professional registrations include BACP, UKCP, BPC, BABCP, PWP accreditation, postgraduate Low‑Intensity CBT qualifications or Master's‑level CBT training. Staffing must include approximately 4 FTE Step 2 and 4 FTE Step 3 practitioners, plus a designated Contract Lead and senior clinical oversight.
Experience and Compliance:
Providers must demonstrate experience delivering NICE‑concordant BSL Talking Therapies, stepped care, use of accredited workforce, NHS Digital dataset submissions, pathway integration and provision of BSL digital self‑help tools. Additional evidence may be requested.
Data Requirements:
The Provider must complete monthly NHS Talking Therapies dataset submissions to NHS Digital, maintain secure IT systems for outcomes reporting and ensure routine outcomes inform clinical supervision and quality improvement. Required data includes referral numbers, waiting times, numbers entering/completing treatment, recovery and improvement outcomes, DNAs, incidents, complaints, demographic information, PEQ feedback, session totals and all clinical outcome measures. Monthly local reporting to commissioners is mandatory.
Governance and Safety:
The Provider must maintain safe‑recruitment processes including enhanced DBS checks, registration and qualification verification and right‑to‑work checks. Clinical supervision must comply with the NHS Talking Therapies Manual, UCL Supervision Standards and the Supervision Competency Framework. All therapists must be fluent BSL users (minimum CACDP Level 6 or equivalent).
Economic & Financial Standing:
Capacity to deliver block funded activity . Monthly payments tied to delivery evidence. Ability to notify commissioners if demand exceeds capacity. Turnover (or income) of at least two times the annual contact value (£34,013) which is £68,026. Where the Tenderer is a profit-making organisation, that the Tenderer has gross profit / turnover ratio of at least 10%.Where the Tenderer is a non-profit making/charitable organisation, that the Tenderer has an operating surplus greater than 0%, and where this is not the case, that any reported deficit is either a planned deficit, or fully explained in the accounts. The Tenderer has a minimum liquidity ratio of 1.00. Where the Tenderer is a non-profit making/charitable organisation, that the Tenderer has unrestricted reserves equivalent to six (6) months' operating costs for the Service, which is £22,321. There should be an unqualified audit opinion. Dun & Bradstreet risk of low, low-moderate or moderate
Technical & Professional Ability - Must Have Experience Providing
NICE concordant Talking Therapies in BSL, stepped care delivery, accredited clinicians, dataset submission to NHS Digital, strong interdependencies across pathways, provision of digital BSL self help tools.
Assessment will be based on the following Key Criteria:
Quality and innovation - 35%
Value - 15%
Integration, collaboration and service sustainability - 20%
Improving access, reducing health inequalities and facilitating choice - 20%
Social value - 10%
We may ask for further information from the provider to support any of the above requirements.
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Hertfordshire County Council buys Health services (CPV 8510), and who usually turns up
Hertfordshire County Council’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Health services (CPV 8510) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means registered in East of England.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in East of England.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 67 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid11% / 15%
2–319% / 35%
4–611% / 38%
7+59% / 12%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate21% / 41%
Within ±2%79% / 53%
Above estimate0% / 5%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1Service Overview:CPV 8510Estimate not published
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 82 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid15%
2–335%
4–638%
7+12%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record · publisher note attached- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 6 Mar 2026, 15:55 GMT
- Last source update
- 6 Mar 2026, 15:55 GMT
- Authority reference
HCC2617452- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-020569- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-066493Find a Tender
Publisher note: This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) intended approach notice. The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023. For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 or the Procurement Act 2023 do not apply to this award. Award decision-makers. Please insert here : Head of Integrated Health and Care Commissioning and Commissioning Manager, Mental Health The intention is to award a contract using the most suitable provider process. Therefore a Contract Notice will not be published (section II.3 is a mandaory field)
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
6 Mar 2026 → 1 Apr 2026 · 2 dates- Notice published230 days ago6 Mar 2026, 15:55 GMT
- Tender notice expected204 days ago1 Apr 2026, 00:00 BST
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications
Official links; attachments are not copiedNo document links were published on the notice.