TenderlineUK
Procurement Intelligence
Official OCDS
Find a Tender
complete
Official procurement procedure

Net Zero Accelerator (phase two) - West and East Midlands

Architectural
construction
engineering and inspection services
Published value
Not published
Submission deadline Not published
Lots published1
Procurement Executive Summary
AI & Search Synopsis
Generated from official OCDS record
Tenderline Synopsis: Department for Education: "Net Zero Accelerator (phase two) - West and East Midlands". Published status: complete. Published value: Value not published. 1 published lot. Submission deadline not published. See the official notice for participation instructions.
Contracting AuthorityDepartment for EducationScope & CategoriesNot publishedSubmission Window
complete
No deadline published
Submission GatewayDirect notice routeLegal Basis & RegimeStandard procurementEstimated Value (exc. VAT)Not published
Bidder Intelligence · Authority Profile: Department for Education
Market Analytics
View Authority Profile →
Derived from OCDS awards & bid statistics
Published history for Department for Education. These figures describe retained records, not a forecast of bids or a measure of buyer bias.
Published-to-award variance
Not availableInsufficient comparable data
Requires at least 5 comparable procedures
Competition Density
49.6Bids / Report
11.6% of reports have one bid
Supplier ConcentrationNo estimate
Insufficient attributable awardsNo concentration estimate available
Payment Terms
Check noticePublished terms
Payment obligations depend on the applicable regime and contract. Consult the official documents.
Coverage: 368 active published awards; 352 bid reports (which may be per lot). Supplier values exclude multi-supplier awards, frameworks and DPS, and use GBP only. They are published award values, not payments. Published-to-award variance compares single-lot, single-award, single-supplier GBP procedures with explicitly non-framework/non-DPS status; increases remain in the average. Unpublished data stays unknown. Awarded suppliers are winners, not all bidders.
Procedure terms
Contracting AuthorityDepartment for Education
Procedure methodNot published
Procurement categoryNot published
Statuscomplete
Framework / DPSNot published
CompetitionNot published
Above thresholdNot published
Legal basisNot published
Tender period startsNot published
Clarification deadlineNot published
Electronic submissionNot published
Submission languagesNot published
Published5 Sept 2025, 15:32 BST
Last source update5 Sept 2025, 15:32 BST
Recurring procurementNot published
ClassificationArchitectural, construction, engineering and inspection services
OCIDocds-h6vhtk-059529
What is being bought
This VEAT notice relates to the modification of a Department for Education contract for the appointment of a delivery partner in the West and East Midlands to deliver the Net Zero Accelerator project to selected schools and colleges in those regions, which aims to reduce carbon emissions through energy efficiency upgrades, decarbonisation planning, and sustainability engagement. This modification will add an additional 20 schools and colleges to the West and East Midlands contract, in addition to the 47 sites initially accommodated for in the contract and the 10 additional sites permitted within it’s extension option, resulting in a total of 77 sites. This notice also confirms that the Department has exercised it’s contractual right to add 10 additional schools to the contract, as permitted by Regulation 72(1)(a). Aside from the increased volume of sites, there are no changes to deliverables and outcomes of the contracts. Consequently, the total value of each contract will increase by approximately 21.96%, up to a maximum of £7,430,000, please see the Description of the procurement for further details. These modifications are permitted under Regulation 72 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015, please see section D for further justification information. All values listed exclude VAT.
What changed
From the official release history
  1. Status changed to complete
    5 Sept 2025, 15:32 BST
  2. Official notice release published
    5 Sept 2025, 15:32 BST
  3. Buyer information updated
    5 Sept 2025, 15:32 BST
Lots and requirements (1)
Published by the contracting authority
  • Lot 1 · #1
    Individual lot title not published
    Status not published
    Published valueNot published
    This requirement was competed compliantly via an open-procedure multi-lot tender. When the original contract award notices were published, an error occurred in which only the minimum contract value of £2,600,000 was disclosed. This figure did not reflect the full value advertised in the initial procurement documents. This VEAT notice serves in part to clarify the original maximum contract value of £6,091,915. Due to this modification, the maximum contract value is now increased to £7,430,000. All values listed exclude VAT. The Contracts Finder identifier number for the award notice is as follows: b81fa051-60db-4630-a112-d2d13d76b128 - Net Zero Accelerator (phase two) - Midlands Additional information: The overall weightings were 80% quality (as broken down in the above Quality criterion section) and 20% price.
    Contract periodNot published
    EligibilityNot published
    Options / renewalNot published
Timeline
  1. Procedure published
    5 Sept 2025, 15:32 BST
  2. Award active
    Not published · Not published
  3. Contract active
    Signed 30 Jun 2025, 00:00 BST · £7,430,000
Commercial outcome and competition
Awards
MACE CONSULT LIMITED
Not published · Not published · active
Contracts
Net Zero Accelerator (phase two) - West Midlands
£7,430,000 · signed 30 Jun 2025, 00:00 BST · active
Bid statisticsNo aggregate bid statistics published
Buyer and organisations in this procedure

Department for Education

Contracting authority GB-FTS-165
View buyer profile
  • Department for Education
    buyer

    Sanctuary Buildings, 20, Great Smith Street, London, UK, SW1P 3BT
    +44 3700002288
  • High Court of Justice
    reviewBody

    Judicial Office 11th floor, Thomas More Building Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
  • Mace Consult Ltd
    supplier

    GB-COH: 07094851
    155 Moorgate, London, UKI, EC2M 6XB
Documents (0)
Official links; attachments are not copied
No data
No linked documents are published
Related procedures (0)
No data
No related procedures published
Planning and rationale
Planning budgetNot published
No-engagement rationaleNot published
Procedure rationaleThe modification to the contracts fall within the permissible grounds set out under Regulation 72(1)(e) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 in that the modifications are not substantial within the meaning of Regulation 72(8) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 because: a) The inclusion of the additional schools and colleges into each contract does not render any of the contracts materially different compared to when it was originally procured. The type of services originally required of the contract (the provision of school decarbonisation works and associated support services, including but not limited to procurement and behavioural change management) is the same as that which it will carry out on the previously awarded contracts, it is just a case that the number of schools receiving these services under the contracts will increase. b) Adding the additional schools and colleges would not have changed the outcome of the original procurement in any way. The Contract will be fully operated in accordance with their current terms; c) As the current contracts will be operated for the additional schools and colleges on the same terms, this does not alter the economic balance of the contract in favour of the development partners; d) The change does not considerably alter the scope of the contracts as the works and services provided will remain unchanged, meaning there will be no significant changes to the deliverables, and the schools and colleges which have been included are adjacent in terms of geographical scope also; e) This is not a change in contractor. The modifications are also exempt under Regulation 72(1)(c) because the need for them has been brought about by circumstances the Department for Education could not have foreseen, and they do not change the overall nature of the contracts and the value changes are below 50%. Additional and unforeseen budget for the overall project has become available which must be spent imminently and the timeframes for the spend would not allow for an additional procurement process to take place. Government rules dictate that the original procurement could not have catered for optional additional value such as budget increases as only approved budgets can be advertised to the market.