Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 13 Nov 2025, 10:05 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

National Registry for Robotically Assisted Surgery

Authority: Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (Public body)

ServicesAbove threshold
Sectors: Health & Social Care (85) Delivery: UK
Planned pipeline value£1,050,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 2 Mar 2026from the planned procurement notice
Contract term 3 yrsends 30 Sept 2029 · up to 30 Sept 2031 with extensions · starts 1 Oct 2026

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The contract for the Robotically Assisted Surgery Registry will initially be delivered for NHS-funded care in England, for a period of 3 years, at a maximum total budget of up to £1,050,000 GBP excluding VAT. Bids exceeding this limit will be rejected. There is potential to extend the contract for up to two additional years.

This extension period, if decided, will be invoked under one of the below options

1)A funded extension at a pro rata cost of the first 3 years

2)The successful bidder, working with the Authority to develop a self-sustaining funding model for the continuation of the registry

Please note that the Authority cannot guarantee that an extension will be granted.

The maximum budget 'core' value is £1,050,000 excluding VAT. This excludes the potential two-year extension and aspirational intent which will be included in the service specification at point of tender.

The role of a national registry is to provide high-quality information on the organisation, delivery and outcomes of healthcare, together with tools and support to enable healthcare providers and other audiences to make best use of this information. Outcomes are benchmarked against national guidance and standards e.g. quality standards from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and those from other established professional and patient sources.

This registry is expected to:

Provide information to improve patient safety and outcomes by tracking short- and long-term results of robotic-assisted surgery, evaluate effectiveness and value of robotic-assisted surgery compared with conventional techniques, support standardisation of practice and identify variation in surgical outcomes across hospitals and surgeons, provide evidence to inform clinical guidelines, commissioning, and regulatory decisions and facilitate research and innovation in robotic surgical technologies and techniques.

National registries are expected to:

a.Develop a robust, high-quality registry designed around key quality metrics as laid out in NICE EVA

b.Achieve, articulate and maintain close alignment with relevant NICE national guidance and quality standards throughout the establishment of the registry, as appropriate

c.Enable the provision of timely, high-quality data that compares providers of healthcare, and comprises an integrated mixture of named Trust or Health board, Integrated Care System (ICS), commissioner, multidisciplinary team (MDT), possibly consultant or clinical team level and other levels of reporting

d.Engage patients, carers and the public in a meaningful way, achieving a strong patient voice which informs and contributes to the design, functioning, outputs and direction of the registry

e.Consider the value and feasibility of linking data at an individual patient level to other relevant national datasets either from the outset or in the future, and plan for these linkages from the inception of the contract

f.Ensure robust methodological and statistical input at all stages of the audit

g.Identify from the outset the full range of audiences for any reports and other registry outputs, and plan and tailor them accordingly

h.Provide results in a timely, accessible and meaningful manner minimising the reporting delay and providing continual access to each stakeholder for their own data

i.Utilise strong and effective project and programme management to deliver outputs on time and within budget

j.Develop and maintain strong engagement with local clinicians, networks, commissioners, patients and their families and carers and charity and community support groups in order to drive improvements in services

Further details of NICE Early Value Assessment (EVA) process and methods can be found at: www.nice.org.uk/what-nice-does/our-g… ↗

For more information about this opportunity, please visit the Delta eSourcing portal at:

www.delta-esourcing.com/tenders/UK-UK-London… ↗

To respond to this opportunity, please click here:

www.delta-esourcing.com/respond/J3EC5N6DAH ↗

CPV: Health services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1PlannedRenewal 3 yrs
Contract period: 1 Oct 2026 – 30 Sept 2029 (3 yrs) · up to 30 Sept 2031 with extensions
Delivery: UK
Extensions: Extension options published

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership buys Health services (CPV 8510), and who usually turns up

Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Health services (CPV 8510) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
The marketHealth services (CPV 8510) · UK-wide
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 0 of 6 known-size awards · market: CPV 8510 · UK-wide, n=2,281
0%53%

No small-firm winners recorded among this authority’s published awards in this sample.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no winner locations published · market: CPV 8510 · UK-wide, n=3,025
—79%

No winner locations published for this authority. Local means a registered address in the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 5 decided notices · market: CPV 8510 · UK-wide, n=93
81 days59 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 81 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: exactly 6 of 6 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 8510 · UK-wide, n=2,264
100%76%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer5 lots with bid counts · broad CPV 85
100% had one bid
The market488 lots with bid counts · CPV 8510 · UK-wide
24% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid100% / 24%
Buyer: 5 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 118 of 488 lots with published bid counts.
2–30% / 33%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 159 of 488 lots with published bid counts.
4–60% / 26%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 128 of 488 lots with published bid counts.
7+0% / 17%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts. Market: 83 of 488 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyerToo few to chart: 3 lots with estimate and award, 5 needed · broad CPV 85
The market300 lots with estimate and award · CPV 8510 · UK-wide
36% below estimate
Market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate36%
Market: 107 of 300 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%58%
Market: 175 of 300 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate6%
Market: 18 of 300 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 851036 monthsPublished estimate£1.1m
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 488 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet24% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 488 similar lots
1 bid24%
118 of 488 similar past lots received 1 bid (24%).
2–333%
159 of 488 similar past lots received 2–3 (33%).
4–626%
128 of 488 similar past lots received 4–6 (26%).
7+17%
83 of 488 similar past lots received 7+ (17%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 3 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £1.1m, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
13 Nov 2025, 10:05 GMT
Last source update
13 Nov 2025, 10:05 GMT
Authority reference
HQIP NCA - 993938015
FTS notice number
2025/S 000-073406
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Health services
Delivery area
UK
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-05e019 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

13 Nov 2025 → 1 Oct 2026 · 4 dates
  1. Planning notice published348 days ago
    13 Nov 2025, 10:05 GMT
  2. Market engagement327 days ago
    3 Dec 2025, 23:59 GMT

    Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) is seeking to engage with the market on the commissioning of a Robotically Assisted Surgery Registry

    The Authority is looking to deliver on the requirements of both NHS England priorities and the NICE Early Value Assessment (EVA) requirements.

    Further details of NICE Early Value Assessment (EVA) process and methods can be found at: www.nice.org.uk/what-nice-does/our-g… ↗

    HQIP will be looking to hold a pre-market engagement session with potential suppliers on Monday 8th December 2025 10.00am – 11.55am

    Also in attendance will be system partners and service specialists including charities.

    The aim of the pre market engagement session is for interested parties to hear and contribute to discussions with system experts and patient groups that will feed in to HQIP’s final decisions on the scope of the audit during this next contract period, and the anticipated outcomes over the 3-5 years of the audit.

    At this point, the Authority is planning to run this procurement under an open tender.

    The proposed dates (subject to change solely at the Authorities discretion) are as follows:

    • Premarket Engagement session: 8th December 2025
    • Publication of tender opportunity: March 2026
    • Evaluation of submitted bids: April – May 2026
    • Award: May – June 2026
    • Contract start: 1st October 2026

    Whilst the Authority intends to stick to the timeline, it may deviate away from it at any time.

    The expected value of the contract will be subject to increase under aspirational intent measures which will be defined in the service specification at point of tender.

    This aspirational intent will cover the value range and mechanisms for invoking each element of it.

    If you would like to join this pre market engagement event, please email [email protected] stating your name, position and organisation by close of business Wednesday 3rd December 2025 with ' Robotically Assisted Surgery Registry Pre Market Engagement Event' as the subject line.

  3. Tender notice expected238 days ago
    2 Mar 2026, 23:59 GMT
  4. Contract starts26 days ago
    1 Oct 2026, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    13 Nov 2025, 10:05 GMT
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Ltd

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PVVQ-6113-CJWD 128 City Road, London, London, EC1V 2NXContact email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure