Official UK procurement notice
Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) design and build project - Lancashire Renewables
Authority: LANCASHIRE RENEWABLES LIMITED (Public body)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionLancashire Renewables Limited (LRL) operates and manages two waste treatment facilities on behalf of its public sector shareholders. LRL is undertaking a strategic review of the Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) at Farington Waste Recovery Park, Sustainability Way, Leyland, PR26 6TB.
The existing MRF was commissioned approximately 15 years ago. It processes dry mixed recyclables but is increasingly constrained by its design capacity, ageing infrastructure, process bottlenecks, variable output quality and limited ability to recover additional materials. LRL currently manages approximately 65,000 tonnes per annum of dry mixed recyclables, of which approximately 50,000 tonnes per annum can be processed at Farington; the balance is diverted off site. The existing plant operates at an estimated average throughput of approximately 16 tonnes per hour and does not currently target paper, card, cartons or flexible plastics as separate output streams.
Changes to waste composition, end-market quality requirements and national policy initiatives, including Extended Producer Responsibility, the Deposit Return Scheme and Simpler Recycling, create a need for greater capacity, recovery, quality and flexibility. LRL has recently concluded an independent feasibility study assessing three strategic options: refurbishment of the existing MRF; construction of a new advanced MRF; and a hybrid solution combining a new MRF with redevelopment of the existing plant. The study identifies a new MRF as the most robust long-term option, while recognising the higher capital requirement and the need for further design and commercial validation.
LRL is therefore undertaking preliminary market engagement to substantiate the feasibility study's principal cost, programme, technical and delivery assumptions before further developing a business case for its Shareholders. LRL's earlier high-level market understanding indicated a potential new-MRF cost in the region of £13-15m, whereas the independent feasibility assessment produced an indicative total project cost closer to £20m and a delivery period of approximately 3-4 years. The cost figures are not a budget, target price or statement of affordability.
At this stage, LRL would like to formally engage with experienced MRF designers and builders, process-equipment integrators, principal contractors and organisations capable of turnkey, EPC or EPCM delivery. Consortium or supply-chain responses are welcome where the proposed team can demonstrate an integrated route to delivery.
The indicative project requirements and outputs from a future MRF build project are to:
- Provide a resilient facility capable of processing LRL's forecast dry mixed recyclables, currently considered to be broadly 64,000 to 67,000 tonnes per annum, subject to validation.
- Enable full or materially increased on-site processing and reduce reliance on off-site diversion.
- Improve recovery rates, output purity and revenue potential across plastics, ferrous and non-ferrous metals, glass and fibre streams.
- Provide a credible approach to flexible plastics, cartons, paper and card, taking account of evolving collection systems, legislation and end markets.
- Make effective use of the existing building shell and available site infrastructure where practicable, including existing power and utilities, while identifying upgrades if required.
- Maintain safe, compliant and efficient operations and minimise interruption to the existing MRF during delivery and transition.
- Include appropriate process control, data, automation, optical sorting, AI-enabled monitoring or robotics where technically and commercially justified.
- Provide suitable redundancy, maintainability, access, storage and future flexibility.
The purpose of this engagement is to obtain current market evidence sufficient to inform LRL's business case, preferred technical option, delivery strategy and any subsequent procurement. It is not a call for competition, invitation to tender or request for a developed design.
The engagement is intended to operate in two stages: an initial, light-touch expression of interest followed by site visits and structured post-visit feedback from selected participants. More detailed market views will be sought only after participants have received further context.
LRL intends to use the engagement to:
- Test the likely total project cost and the principal components of that cost;
- Understand what a proportionate, value-for-money technical solution would look like for the site;
- Understand realistic project development and delivery timescales;
- Identify the main technical, commercial, programme, operational, planning, permitting and interface risks;
- Understand preferred contracting and risk-allocation models;
- Identify information required from LRL to enable a future market to price and programme the project with confidence;
- Ultimately, assess market capability, capacity and interest in a potential future procurement to build a new MRF at LRL's Leyland facility.
The contract dates provided are indicative placeholders for system compliance purposes only. Actual contract dates will be determined upon completion of this PME exercise and will be subject to subsequent business case approval.
CPV: Construction works for recycling station · Waste-treatment plant construction work
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedPipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How LANCASHIRE RENEWABLES LIMITED buys Engineering works and construction works (CPV 4522), and who usually turns up
LANCASHIRE RENEWABLES LIMITED’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Engineering works and construction works (CPV 4522) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
No supplier sizes published for this authority.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means registered in North West England.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered outside North West England.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 64 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Missing bid counts may hide more single-bid awards. This share is a minimum.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid14%
2–329%
4–643%
7+14%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate62%
Within ±2%19%
Above estimate19%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 4522Estimate not published
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 249 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid10%
2–327%
4–629%
7+34%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Works
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 21 Aug 2026, 14:04 BST
- Last source update
- 21 Aug 2026, 14:04 BST
- Authority reference
JM/LRL/26/020- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-079952- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06e9afFind a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
21 Aug 2026 → 1 Sept 2027 · 3 dates- Planning notice published62 days ago21 Aug 2026, 14:04 BST
- Market engagement17 days ago5 Oct 2026, 23:59 BST
The engagement deadline above is for initial expressions of interest to this PME via our e-tender portal only. Project engagement will continue beyond that date.
Interested organisations are invited to submit a short expression of interest, normally no more than 3-5 pages excluding a cover page and brief case study sheets. The purpose of this initial response is to allow LRL to understand market interest, relevant capability and the potential value of further engagement. LRL recognises that respondents will not yet have access to sufficient site, layout, waste, utilities or operating information to develop a reliable solution or estimate.
EOIs should contain the following:
- Organisation and proposed role: a brief description of the respondent, its relevant UK capability and whether it would expect to participate as a MRF designer or builder, process-equipment supplier, systems integrator, principal contractor, turnkey provider, EPC or EPCM provider, consortium member or in another role.
- Relevant experience: up to three concise examples of comparable municipal MRF projects, identifying the respondent's role, broad facility scale, scope delivered and current status.
- Interest and capacity: confirmation of interest in the potential project, capacity to participate in site engagement around November 2026 and the disciplines or proposed attendees that would be represented.
- Indicative range, if reasonably available: respondents may provide a broad, non-binding view of potential total project cost and overall delivery duration, together with the most important assumptions or caveats. This is optional, and responses will not be disadvantaged where the respondent considers that additional information or a site visit is required before offering a meaningful view.
- Information requirements: the key information and documents the respondent would ideally need to provide useful feedback following the next stage of the engagement process.
Interested organisations are invited to:
- Register on LRL's e-tender portal, www.the-chest.org.uk ↗;
- Locate the market engagement project under current opportunities by Lancashire Renewables Limited and express interest;
- Submit the short expression of interest described above through the portal by the engagement deadline.
LRL anticipates holding site visits and structured engagement meetings around November 2026. Subject to the level of interest and practical capacity, LRL may invite a nominal number of suitably experienced respondents to participate. Invitations are expected to take account of relevant experience, the respondent's proposed role, capacity to engage and the range of useful market perspectives represented. Any invitation will be for market-engagement purposes only; it will not constitute a procurement shortlist or confer an advantage in any future competition.
At the site visits, LRL expects to provide a presentation on the current operation, the feasibility study's key outputs, forecast requirements, the business-case challenge, and a walk around site to the relevant buildings where a future MRF could be built. LRL expects to provide a consistent, proportionate information pack, potentially including relevant site and building-layout drawings, available utilities information, current process and operating data, indicative waste composition, known site constraints and selected feasibility-study information. Information may be subject to confidentiality restrictions.
Following the visits, LRL intends to invite participating organisations to formalise their observations through a short, structured feedback return. This is expected to seek proportionate, non-binding views on: the respondent's indicative preferred solution; total capital cost range and major cost headings; indicative staffing and principal operating-cost drivers; likely throughput, recovery, quality and availability; a high-level programme; preferred delivery and contract model; principal risks and assumptions; and any further surveys or information required. Regarding estimated costs, respondents are encouraged to provide their own independent, evidence-based ranges and assumptions rather than align with the estimates provided by LRL or its feasibility study.
LRL will not seek a tender-level price, developed process design, detailed equipment schedule, full mass balance or activity-level programme.
LRL may use a standard agenda and feedback template to improve comparability. It may publish or otherwise share an anonymised summary of material market feedback to support transparency and ensure that participation does not create an unfair advantage in any future procurement.
This engagement is particularly suited to organisations with demonstrable experience in the design, integration, construction, refurbishment, commissioning or turnkey delivery of MRFs processing municipal dry mixed recyclables. LRL also welcomes responses from integrated teams or consortia capable of addressing process, civil, structural, electrical, controls and project-delivery interfaces.
Please note:
- Participation is voluntary and at each organisation's own cost. LRL will not pay fees, expenses or other compensation for preparing a response or attending a site visit.
- LRL does not require respondents to undertake material design development or disclose proprietary know-how. Respondents should clearly identify commercially sensitive information.
- This notice does not commit LRL to undertake a procurement, select any option, use any delivery model, invite any respondent to tender or award a contract.
- Participation or non-participation will not of itself advantage or disadvantage an organisation in any future procurement.
- LRL may use information received to develop its requirements, business case, procurement strategy, contract terms and evaluation approach. Any future procurement will be conducted separately and in accordance with applicable law.
- LRL may contact respondents for clarification and may amend or cancel the engagement process.
- Today22 Oct 2026
- Contract startsin 313 days1 Sept 2027, 00:00 BST
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Preliminary market engagement notice published21 Aug 2026, 14:04 BSTUK2
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender