Official UK procurement notice
Jaywick Sands Open Spaces Preliminary Market Engagement
Authority: Tendring District Council (Local council)·On behalf of: Essex County Council
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionTendring District Council (TDC) is undertaking Preliminary Market Engagement with suitably qualified and experienced contractors in relation to the proposed delivery of the Jaywick Sands Public Open Spaces Regeneration Project.
The project forms part of the wider Community Regeneration Partnership Programme, under which £19.8 million has been awarded to deliver 15 regeneration schemes across the district. Approximately £3.2 million has been allocated to improve public open spaces within Jaywick Sands.
This market engagement exercise is intended to inform the Council's procurement strategy, test market capacity and capability, and gather feedback from potential suppliers prior to the commencement of a formal procurement process. Participation in this engagement will not form part of any future evaluation process and does not confer any advantage in any subsequent procurement.
Tendring District Council (TDC) is undertaking Preliminary Market Engagement with suitably qualified and experienced civil engineering and public realm contractors regarding the delivery of the Jaywick Sands Highway and Public Realm Improvement Scheme.
The project forms part of the wider Community Regeneration Partnership Programme and is centred on the comprehensive improvement and reconstruction of Brooklands Road, a key route within Jaywick Sands. The scheme aims to improve resilience, safety, accessibility and connectivity for residents and visitors, whilst delivering associated enhancements to adjoining public spaces and community assets.
Brooklands Road is currently an unadopted road and suppliers should take this into consideration when considering delivery approaches and associated stakeholder requirements.
The primary objectives of the project are to:
Deliver a comprehensive reconstruction and resurfacing of Brooklands Road.
Improve highway drainage and long-term resilience, including coordination with existing drainage infrastructure connected to the sea wall.
Enhance pedestrian safety through traffic calming measures and improved footway provision.
Improve accessibility and connectivity between residential areas, community facilities and the seafront.
Create a safer and more attractive public environment that supports wider regeneration objectives.
Deliver complementary public realm, landscape and recreation improvements across adjacent locations in Jaywick Sands.
Primary Scope - Brooklands Road
The principal contract requirement is anticipated to comprise:
Full highway repair and resurfacing works.
Drainage improvement works, including integration with existing coastal drainage infrastructure.
Traffic calming measures, including potential raised tables and speed reduction features.
Potential highway layout alterations, including consideration of one-way traffic arrangements.
Public realm improvements around the Resource Centre and bus stop area.
New and upgraded pedestrian routes, including raised footways and accessibility improvements.
Suppliers should note that Brooklands Road is currently an unadopted road and that delivery of the works may require coordination with relevant stakeholders regarding ownership, maintenance and future management arrangements.
Secondary Scope - Public Realm Improvements
Associated works may include improvements at:
Brooklands Gardens.
Crossways Park.
St Christophers Way Car Park.
Garden Road.
Beach Bay Walk.
These elements may include landscaping, play equipment, seating, lighting, signage, biodiversity enhancements and connectivity improvements.
Prospective suppliers should be aware of the following considerations:
The principal works are focused on the reconstruction and improvement of Brooklands Road.
Brooklands Road is currently an unadopted road.
All sites are located within a flood-risk area.
Certain aspects of the scheme may be subject to ecological constraints and Biodiversity Net Gain (BNG) requirements.
Elements of the project will require engagement with statutory consultees, including the Environment Agency.
Certain aspects of the proposed works may require approvals, permits, consents and/or technical agreement from the Environment Agency and other relevant authorities.
Highway drainage proposals will need to consider existing drainage infrastructure and interfaces with coastal defence and sea wall systems.
Significant public consultation has informed the scheme design and the successful contractor may be required to support ongoing stakeholder and community engagement activities.
Programming and phasing of the works will need to minimise disruption to residents, visitors and local businesses.
The Council is particularly interested in engaging with contractors that can demonstrate experience in:
Highway reconstruction and carriageway improvement schemes.
Highway drainage works in coastal or flood-risk environments.
Delivery of works within occupied residential areas.
Public realm and streetscape improvements.
Community engagement and stakeholder management.
Multi-disciplinary civil engineering projects incorporating highways, landscaping and public infrastructure.
Working with the Environment Agency and other statutory consultees on projects requiring approvals, permits or technical consents.
Delivery of highway or infrastructure projects involving unadopted roads or complex stakeholder environments.
The Authority is specifically seeking feedback regarding:
Delivery approaches for the reconstruction of Brooklands Road.
Programming and phasing strategies to minimise disruption to residents and businesses.
Management of drainage and flood-risk challenges.
Experience of securing approvals and consents from the Environment Agency and other statutory bodies.
Experience of delivering infrastructure projects on unadopted roads.
Appropriate contract packaging and procurement routes for a highway-led regeneration scheme.
Opportunities for innovation, value engineering and social value delivery.
CPV: Construction work
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedPipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Tendring District Council buys Construction work (CPV 45), and who usually turns up
Tendring District Council’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Construction work (CPV 45) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in East of England.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 17 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid29% / 11%
2–314% / 23%
4–60% / 31%
7+57% / 35%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate40% / 41%
Within ±2%0% / 30%
Above estimate60% / 29%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 45Published estimate£3.2m
This lot lists more than one class in CPV 45. The comparison uses that group.
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 275 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid11%
2–323%
4–631%
7+35%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Works
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Below threshold
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 9 Jul 2026, 10:18 BST
- Last source update
- 9 Jul 2026, 10:18 BST
- Authority reference
Ten_09- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-064523- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06c715Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
9 Jul 2026 → 1 Dec 2026 · 3 dates- Planning notice published111 days ago9 Jul 2026, 10:18 BST
- Market engagement82 days ago7 Aug 2026, 23:59 BST
Tendring District Council is undertaking a Preliminary Market Engagement (PME) exercise for the proposed Jaywick Sands Highway and Public Realm Improvement Scheme. Interested suppliers must register on the Open eSourcing (www.open-uk.org ↗) system and express an interest in project reference OPEN20261559 to access the market engagement pack, supporting documents and questionnaire.
The PME exercise will be open for a four-week period and will close at 12:00 noon on 07 August 2026. Suppliers are invited to review the information provided and submit responses via the questionnaire available within Open. Any clarification questions should be submitted through the Open messaging facility during the engagement period. Responses received will be used to help inform the procurement strategy and development of the future tender opportunity.
- Today29 Oct 2026
- Contract startsin 32 days1 Dec 2026
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Preliminary market engagement notice published9 Jul 2026, 10:18 BSTUK2
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
2 public bodies on the noticeOther public bodies
- Essex County CouncilProcess contact pointProcuring entityProcuring on behalf of
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender