Find a TenderRequests to participate open Tender notice
Published 9 Oct 2026, 18:33 BST

Official UK procurement notice

ITT - Swindon Archive Decarbonisation Design Team (UID 320)

Authority: Historic England (Central government)

Two-stageServicesCompetitive flexible procedureAbove threshold
Sectors: Construction & Civil Engineering (45)Architecture & Engineering (71)+5 more Delivery: Delivery location not published
Published estimate£149,000£178,000 inc. VAT
Submission deadline 4 Nov 202609:30 GMT · 25d 7h left
Clarification cut-off 28 Oct 202617:00 GMT · questions to the authority
Contract term 8 moends 30 Sept 2027 · up to 30 Aug 2028 with extensions · starts 28 Jan 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Historic England is seeking to appoint a multidisciplinary design team to develop the Archive Decarbonisation Project at its national archive facility in Swindon through RIBA Stage 3. Under the terms of this contract, we reserve the right to award RIBA stage 4 following the satisfactory completion of stage 3 and the receipt of an acceptable return for Stage 4 methodology and pricing schedule (in line with rates provided at stage 3).

The Historic England Archive is one of the nation's most significant collections of records relating to England's historic environment. The purpose-built archive store was constructed in 1993 to BS5454 standards and provides specialist environmental conditions for the long-term preservation of nationally important photographic, film and documentary collections. However, the building and its associated mechanical and electrical systems were not designed with energy efficiency or net-zero objectives in mind.

The project forms a key part of Historic England's commitment to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2040 and responds to the urgent requirement to replace ageing building services plant that has reached, and in some cases exceeded, its operational life. Recent equipment failures have highlighted the increasing risk to collection preservation, building resilience and operational continuity.

A RIBA Stage 2 feasibility study has recently been completed. The study explored a range of options to reduce operational carbon, improve energy performance and secure the long-term sustainability of the archive while maintaining stringent environmental conditions required for collection care.

Based on the information provided, Historic England's preferred option currently involves:

• Replacement of existing end-of-life environmental control systems with significantly more energy-efficient solutions.

• Rationalisation of archive environmental zones to improve operational efficiency.

• Fabric improvements to enhance thermal performance and airtightness.

• Fire safety upgrades and associated building works.

• Creation of additional archive storage capacity through the repurposing of existing plant room space, reducing reliance on external storage facilities and supporting future collection growth.

Scope of Services

The appointed design team will be required to lead the project through:

RIBA Stage 3 – Spatial Coordination

Including but not limited to:

• Review and validation of the completed RIBA Stage 2 outputs.

• Development of the preferred design solution.

• Coordination of architectural, structural and building services design, ensuring full integration of archive operational, conservation and storage requirements, and compliance with relevant standards and guidance, including BS EN 16893:2018 Evaluation and mitigation of collection care risks associated with proposed mechanical solutions.

• Interpretation and integration of thermographic surveys, air-tightness testing and other specialist investigations.

• Use and develop the client-provided Revit BIM model as the principal tool for multidisciplinary spatial coordination, ensuring that all proposed building-services systems, plant, access requirements and interfaces are accurately modelled and coordinated with the architectural and structural design.

• Review, validate and develop the existing building physics model to a level appropriate for RIBA Stage 3, reflecting the spatially coordinated design and demonstrating performance against the agreed environmental requirements, energy and carbon targets, plant loads and future climate scenarios.

• Planning application preparation and submission.

• Cost planning and value management exercises.

• Development of a robust whole-life cost and carbon assessment.

• Stakeholder engagement and workshop facilitation.

• Support Historic England’s fundraising activities for the project by providing reasonable information, evidence, and documentation to assist fundraising and grant applications where requested.

  • How the procedure runs: Stage 1 - Using Procurement Specific Questionnaire (Conditions of participation) to reduce the number of suppliers to be invited to submit final tenders. If supplier passes all Stage 1 questions, then they will be invited to participate to Stage 2. Stage 2 - Invitation To Tender (ITT) - Quality and Pricing evaluation questions.

CPV: Architectural and related services · Architectural design services · Architectural, engineering and planning services · Engineering design services · Environmental engineering consultancy services · Environmental improvement works · Project and design preparation, estimation of costs

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · value published
Lot #1Renewal 8 moPublished valueAED 149,000
Contract period: 28 Jan 2027 — 30 Sept 2027 (up to 30 Aug 2028 with extensions) · up to 1 yr 7 mo with extensionsTurnover guideline: ~AED 298,000/yr≈ 2× annual value
Value
AED 149,000 exc. VAT · AED 178,000 inc. VAT
Extensions
RIBA stage 4 - we reserve the right to award RIBA stage 4 following the satisfactory completion of stage 3 and the receipt of an acceptable return for Stage 4 methodology and pricing schedule (in line with rates provided at stage 3).
45262640 Environmental improvement works71200000 Architectural and related services71220000 Architectural design services71240000 Architectural, engineering and planning services71242000 Project and design preparation, estimation of costs71313000 Environmental engineering consultancy services

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

What it takes to win
i

How this buyer will score bids.

The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).

Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published — the tender pack may add more
How bids are scored
Quality: 70%Price: 30%
Published sub-criteria (2)
  • Quality — 70%
  • Pricing — 30%
Published award criteria (2)
  • Pricing — RIBA Stage 3 fixed price schedule RIBA Stage 3 Rate table RIBA Stage 4 Rate table
  • Quality — Quality 1 - Understanding of Project Objectives and Option Review Approach Quality 2 - Methodology for Option Validation, Design Development and Technical Delivery Quality 3 - Understanding of Archive Collection Requirements Quality 4 - Archive Collections and Environmental Risk Management Quality 5 - Relevant Experience and Lessons Learned Quality 6 - Cost Management and Buildability Quality 7 - Project Team and Resource Commitment Social Value 1 - Environmental stewardship, skills and wider benefit

No conditions of participation were published on the notice; check the tender documents.

What this means for your bid
  • Price carries 30 of 100 points — a 10% discount moves about 3 points. The method statement decides this lot, not the discount.
  • Turnover usually expected at this size: about AED 298,000 (twice the annual value).

Price arithmetic assumes straight proportional scoring — the tender pack may use another formula. Turnover is an indicative market norm (≈2× annual value), not a published condition.

Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid

How Historic England buys Architectural, engineering and planning services (CPV 7124) — and who usually turns up

Historic England’s own published record, next to the South West England market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Architectural, engineering and planning services (CPV 7124) →

1

How the contest usually goes

This buyer’s published record next to the market where the work is delivered — contested contracts only, counted per lot

Question for the bid
This buyerHistoric England · all categories
The marketArchitectural, engineering and planning services (CPV 7124) · South West England (authority’s region)
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 43 of 71 known-size awards · market: CPV 7124, n=10
61%20%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Here, local means registered in South West England.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 21 of 24 known-location awards · market: CPV 7124, n=6
88%33%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in South West England.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 8 decided notices · market: no dates
16 days—

Half of these awards were announced within 16 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 50 of 114 awarded contracts without a rival · market: n=8
44%25%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer19 lots with bid counts · all categories
21% had one bid
The market7 lots with bid counts · CPV 7124
14% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid21% / 14%
Buyer: 4 of 19 lots with published bid counts. Market: 1 of 7 lots with published bid counts.
2–321% / 43%
Buyer: 4 of 19 lots with published bid counts. Market: 3 of 7 lots with published bid counts.
4–616% / 14%
Buyer: 3 of 19 lots with published bid counts. Market: 1 of 7 lots with published bid counts.
7+42% / 29%
Buyer: 8 of 19 lots with published bid counts. Market: 2 of 7 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer43 lots with estimate and award · all categories
42% below estimate
The market96 lots with estimate and award · broad CPV 71
50% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate42% / 50%
Buyer: 18 of 43 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 48 of 96 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%49% / 33%
Buyer: 21 of 43 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 32 of 96 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate9% / 17%
Buyer: 4 of 43 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 16 of 96 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors — from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 71249% single-bidPublished estimate£149,000
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

The published estimate is in AED, so this lot carries no forecast — the model is trained on sterling estimates.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—9% single-bid risk
Past bids on 176 similar lots
1 bid9%
15 of 176 similar past lots received 1 bid (9%).
2–320%
36 of 176 similar past lots received 2–3 (20%).
4–632%
57 of 176 similar past lots received 4–6 (32%).
7+39%
68 of 176 similar past lots received 7+ (39%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 5 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the winning price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A guide, not a price to bid.

—Estimate in AED
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet — the published estimate is £149k, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

SupplierThis buyer’s earlier contractLotAward valueMatch
—

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Restricted route (Stage 2 ITT / Shortlist): Bidding is restricted to invited candidates who qualified at Stage 1. Uninvited suppliers cannot participate in this round.
SupplierWon in this categoryLive contractsAward vs estimate
—
Coverage and what to read with care
  • Each figure explains itself. The on a figure says what it is, how it is counted and which scope this notice’s own record came from (class, division, all categories, or the authority’s 24-month row). The two sides are never blended. A lot’s own market is read at its delivery region where the lot names one; where it names several, or none that can be resolved, the chart falls back to the UK-wide record for the same category and says so under the bar. An empty cell means the source published nothing usable. Long form: Methodology.
  • When we call out a difference. A buyer figure is only flagged against the market when the sample is large enough that the gap is unlikely to be chance; at most two callouts appear, always phrased as a comparison with both numbers and the sample size.
  • Coverage (re-measured 5 Oct on the live record, 94,497 awarded procedures of the last three years). 51 % publish a bid count and 72 % a delivery region, so the market column reads the authority’s registered region when the notice names none, labelled. Of the 17,687 award-vs-estimate pairs, 34 % sit exactly on the estimate — the buyer published the award at the figure it advertised. n is on every figure; a thin sample is muted, never hidden, and a distribution is not drawn as percentages below ten observations.
  • “Match”, text similarity, the expected-bid figure and the distribution drawn beneath it are model outputs, not published facts or win probabilities. Find a Tender does not publish who is bidding. Never shown: contact details, payment behaviour, or a recommended price.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Procedure method
Competitive flexible procedure
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Requests to participate open
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
9 Oct 2026, 18:33 BST
Last source update
9 Oct 2026, 18:33 BST
Award evaluation window
Submission end — 12 Jan 2027
Authority reference
P/REF 00000632
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-095864
Latest notice
Tender notice (UK4)
Classification (CPV)
Architectural and related servicesArchitectural design servicesArchitectural, engineering and planning servicesEngineering design servicesEnvironmental engineering consultancy servicesEnvironmental improvement worksProject and design preparation, estimation of costs
Delivery area
Not published
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-078534 Find a Tender
How it runs
Stage 1 - Using Procurement Specific Questionnaire (Conditions of participation) to reduce the number of suppliers to be invited to submit final tenders. If supplier passes all Stage 1 questions, then they will be invited to participate to Stage 2. Stage 2 - Invitation To Tender (ITT) - Quality and Pricing evaluation questions.

How to participate & submission route

Official notice Submit via In-tend
Submission portal named on this notice: In-tend · Who buys & how to bid on In-tend
Supplier login requiredElectronic submission allowedLanguage: EN
Access & registration note: Free · one account per buying organisation's portal · reCAPTCHA on signup
Requests to participate (first stage)
4 Nov 2026, 09:30 GMT
Tender submission deadline
4 Nov 2026, 09:30 GMT
Clarification deadline
28 Oct 2026, 17:00 GMT
Submission channel
Official e-sourcing portal
Electronic submission
Allowed
Accepted languages
en
Detailed submission instructions & authority contactsFrom official release
Please find further details of the project and submit any questions / submit your response to the procurement specific questionnaire (conditions of participation) via our free procurement portal : supplier.in-tend.co.uk/historicengland/home ↗ Please be aware at this Stage 1 (procurement specific questionnaire (conditions of participation)), we do not require a Tender returned. Only the stage 1 document.
Published estimate £149,000 excludes VAT (£178,000 including VAT).

Timeline

5 published dates · Europe/London
  1. Tender notice publishedearlier today
    9 Oct 2026, 18:33 BST
  2. Clarification questions byin 19 days
    28 Oct 2026, 17:00 GMT
  3. Submission deadlinein 25 days
    4 Nov 2026, 09:30 GMT
  4. Award decision expected byin 95 days
    12 Jan 2027, 23:59 GMT
  5. Contract startsin 110 days
    28 Jan 2027

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Nothing awarded yet
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Notice history

2 events · 1 release on Find a Tender · since 9 Oct 2026
  1. Tender notice published
    9 Oct 2026, 18:33 BSTUK4
  2. First tender notice published
    9 Oct 2026, 18:33 BST

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Historic England

Contracting authorityPublic authority - central government GB-PPON: PXLY-5862-RMML The Engine House, Swindon, South West, SN22EH [email protected]

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure

  • Tender notice tenderTender noticeUK4Tender notice on Find a Tender