Official UK procurement notice
Intended Approach Notice (PSR MSP): Workflow for NHS Labs delivering SCID and SMA ISEs (SPOT-it Methodology)
Authority: NHS England (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionNHS England is looking to procure the national delivery of SPOTit methodology for SCID - and the addition of SMA in-service evaluations (ISEs) - within the NHS Newborn Blood Spot (NBS) Screening Programme.
CPV: Services provided by medical laboratories
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) Intended Approach NoticePlanned
This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) Intended Approach Notice. This notice is subject to Regulation 10 of the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023.<br/><br/>For the avoidance of doubt, this is not a procurement via PA23 or PCR 2015.<br/><br/>NHS England is releasing this Intended Approach Notice as per the Provider Selection Regime (PSR) using the Most Suitable Provider route. As per schedule 5 under Regulation 10 of the PSR, please see the following information below:<br/><br/>1. NHS England is intending to follow the Most Suitable Provider Process to award a contract.<br/><br/>2. The contract title: Workflow for NHS Labs delivering SCID and SMA ISEs (SPOT-it Methodology). The contract reference: C429612.<br/><br/>3. The aim is for NHS England to procure SPOT-it Methodology Screening Labs delivering and implementing the ongoing NHS Newborn Blood Spot in-service evaluation (ISE) for Severe Combined Immuno-Deficiency (SCID), with the addition of the ISE for Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). This procurement maintains national delivery of SPOTit methodology for SCID and the addition of SMA in-service evaluations (ISEs) within the NHS Newborn Blood Spot (NBS) Screening Programme.<br/><br/>4. This contract has not yet formally been awarded; this notice serves as an intended approach notice under the PSR.<br/><br/>5. Should you wish to be considered, written representations should be sent to [email protected], ensuring the following details are referenced:<br/><br/>Project reference: C429612<br/><br/>Project title: Workflow for NHS Labs delivering SCID and SMA ISEs (SPOT-it Methodology) - Most Suitable Provider process<br/><br/>* NB: Please do NOT use the following address for consideration: atamis-1928.my.site.com/s/Welcome ↗ *<br/><br/>This decision has been made as per NHS England governance processes, by the Commercial & Efficiency Control Approval on 5t March 2026. No conflicts of Interest were identified amongst decision makers.<br/><br/>This PSR MSP Intended Approach Notice will be published on 06 March 2026 and will be open until 12pm, 20 March 2026. Additional information: This PSR MSP Intended Approach Notice will be published on 06 March 2026 and will be open until 12pm, 20 March 2026.<br/><br/>This notice is published by NHS England pursuant to Regulation 10 of the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023 as notice of its intention to follow the Most Suitable Provider (MSP) process in respect of Workflow for NHS Labs delivering SCID and SMA In-Service Evaluations (SPOTit Methodology).<br/><br/>The requirement concerns the re-procurement of SPOTit methodology newborn blood spot screening laboratory services to ensure continued delivery of the Severe Combined Immuno-Deficiency (SCID) in-service evaluation and to enable the addition of the Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA) in-service evaluation using the same SPOTit platform. The proposed contract term is 1 April 2026 to 31 March 2029. The combined forecast total contract value is £2,429,264.42.<br/><br/>NHS England considers the MSP process appropriate because Direct Award Processes A and B do not apply and Direct Award Process C is not available. The requirement sits within a highly specialist market, and NHS England considers that it is likely to be able to identify the most suitable provider(s) through a proportionate assessment of likely providers against the PSR key criteria and the basic selection criteria.<br/><br/>The likely provider arrangements currently identified are Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and Synnovis LLP. This notice is being published for at least 14 calendar days before assessment of providers against the key criteria. Any provider not presently known to NHS England that believes it is capable of delivering these services may contact NHS England and ask to be considered as a potential provider.<br/><br/>In accordance with the Provider Selection Regime, NHS England will assess likely providers against the five mandatory key criteria and the basic selection criteria.<br/><br/>The key criteria to be applied are:<br/><br/>Quality and innovation – 60%<br/><br/>Value – 20%<br/><br/>Integration, collaboration and service sustainability – 10%<br/><br/>Improving access, reducing health inequalities and facilitating choice – 5%<br/><br/>Social value – 5%<br/><br/>The basic selection criteria will be applied on a pass/fail basis and will include:<br/><br/>suitability to pursue the activity, including relevant regulatory and accreditation requirements;<br/><br/>economic and financial standing, where relevant; and<br/><br/>technical and professional ability, including accredited laboratory capability, workforce capacity and resilience, QA/QC arrangements, and data/reporting capability.<br/><br/>NHS England considers this weighting to be proportionate to the nature of the requirement. In particular, the greatest relative importance is given to quality and innovation, reflecting the programme-critical need for safe, robust and scientifically reliable delivery of SCID and SMA in-service evaluation activity within the new-born blood spot screening pathway.<br/><br/>Value is also materially weighted, reflecting the need to secure efficient delivery and platform efficiencies where SCID and SMA can be combined.<br/><br/>The remaining criteria will also be taken into account in identifying the most suitable provider(s), including continuity, collaboration, service sustainability, equitable access, and wider social value.
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How NHS England buys Miscellaneous health services (CPV 8514), and who usually turns up
NHS England’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Miscellaneous health services (CPV 8514) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in the delivery region.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 24 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
The buyer’s share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid26%
2–341%
4–616%
7+17%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate37%
Within ±2%51%
Above estimate11%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) Intended Approach NoticeCPV 8514Published estimate£2.4m
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 182 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid31%
2–331%
4–623%
7+15%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record · publisher note attached- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 6 Mar 2026, 13:00 GMT
- Last source update
- 6 Mar 2026, 13:00 GMT
- Authority reference
C429612- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-020374- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-066420Find a Tender
Publisher note: This is a Provider Selection Regime (PSR) Intended Approach Notice.<br/><br/>The awarding of this contract is subject to the Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023.<br/><br/>For avoidance of doubt, the provisions of the Public Contract Regulations 2015 or the Procurement Act 2023 do not apply to this award. It is the intention to award a contract using the Most Suitable Provider process (MSP).
How it was run
Official noticeTender documents are also served through a separate tool: https://atamis-1928.my.site.com/s/Welcome ↗
- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
6 Mar 2026 → 6 Mar 2026 · 2 dates- Tender notice expected230 days ago6 Mar 2026
- Notice published230 days ago6 Mar 2026, 13:00 GMT
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications
Official links; attachments are not copiedNo document links were published on the notice.