Find a TenderOpen admission
Published 2 Jun 2025, 15:46 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Extension to Dynamic Purchasing System for Small Works

Authority: RED KITE LEARNING TRUST (Public body)

Dynamic marketWorksRestricted procedure
Dynamic market estimate£500,000,000market-wide estimate, not attributable revenue
Admission open until 23 Feb 202917:00 GMT · period end, not a bid countdown
Market period Ends 23 Feb 2029

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Please note that this Notice is not a new call for competition, it is a Notice to meet the requirements of reg 34(28) of PCR 2015 in relation to the extension of the validity period for the Dynamic Purchasing System for Small Works, OJEU notice 2018/S 026-057636, to 23rd February 2029, which is line with the Transitional and Saving Provisions. Except for the expiry date, the Dynamic Purchasing System and application process remain unchangedTo register, please follow the link below and select ‘Register now’ app.pagabo.co.uk/login ↗

CPV: Construction work

How this dynamic market works

From the published notice
Type
Dynamic market

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1There are 16 Categories, all categories have subcategories in which help specifically…

There are 16 Categories, all categories have subcategories in which help specifically select the type of works/service that is being procured.

Contract period: … – 23 Feb 2029
Variant bids: not allowed

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

What it takes to win
i

How this buyer will score bids.

The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).

Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add more
Conditions of participation1
  • Suitability

    As per tender documentation

What this means for your bid
  • “Extension to Dynamic Purchasing System for Small Works” is a dynamic market: the contest is a place on its panel, not a single contract.

Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid

How RED KITE LEARNING TRUST buys Construction work (CPV 45), and who usually turns up

RED KITE LEARNING TRUST’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. This notice is a framework or DPS, so only frameworks and DPS are compared. Whole-market view: Construction work (CPV 45) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerRED KITE LEARNING TRUST · all categories
The marketConstruction work (CPV 45) · Yorkshire and the Humber
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 1 of 2 known-size awards · market: division 45 · Yorkshire and the Humber, n=172
1 of 275%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Here, local means registered in Yorkshire and the Humber.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 0 of 3 known-location awards · market: division 45 · Yorkshire and the Humber, n=205
0 of 373%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered outside Yorkshire and the Humber.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: division 45 · Yorkshire and the Humber, n=23
—89 days

Half of these awards were announced within 89 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: exactly 1 of 2 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: division 45 · Yorkshire and the Humber, n=35
1 of 29%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer21 lots with bid counts · all categories
14% had one bid
The market136 lots with bid counts · division 45 · Yorkshire and the Humber
4% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid14% / 4%
Buyer: 3 of 21 lots with published bid counts. Market: 6 of 136 lots with published bid counts.
2–319% / 10%
Buyer: 4 of 21 lots with published bid counts. Market: 13 of 136 lots with published bid counts.
4–629% / 21%
Buyer: 6 of 21 lots with published bid counts. Market: 28 of 136 lots with published bid counts.
7+38% / 65%
Buyer: 8 of 21 lots with published bid counts. Market: 89 of 136 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

On a framework or DPS, prices are agreed when work is called off.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

Not comparable on a framework or DPS. The notice sets up a supplier panel and a ceiling value; what the work actually costs is agreed later, on each call-off or mini-competition, and those publish as contract notices of their own. The award-vs-estimate record of this market therefore sits on the call-offs; this page shows it on the contracts, not on the panel that frames them.

2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1There are 16 Categories, all categories have subcategories in which help specifically…Published estimate£500m
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

4expected bids31% single-bid risk
forecast from 112 past contests
Forecast chances for this lot
1 bid31%
Chance this lot gets 1 bid: 31%. This is a forecast.
2–318%
Chance this lot gets 2–3: 18%. This is a forecast.
4–620%
Chance this lot gets 4–6: 20%. This is a forecast.
7+31%
Chance this lot gets 7+: 31%. This is a forecast.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Priced at call-off
On a framework or DPS the price is agreed on each call-off, so there is no award price to forecast here: the published figure is a ceiling.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Restricted route (Stage 2 ITT / Shortlist): Bidding is restricted to invited candidates who qualified at Stage 1. Uninvited suppliers cannot participate in this round.
SupplierWon in this categoryLive contractsAward vs estimate
2 wins in Yorkshire and the Humber15 panel places
£659m18 awards in 36m · last this month2 live · £9.9m
i

Public contracts this supplier still holds.

Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book.

Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity.

at estimate n=9
1 win in Yorkshire and the Humber13 panel places
£1.2bn43 awards in 36m · last 3 months ago3 live · £171m
i

Public contracts this supplier still holds.

Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book.

Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity.

at estimate n=9
2 wins in Yorkshire and the Humber9 panel places
£5.9m19 awards in 36m · last this month3 live · £4.0m
i

Public contracts this supplier still holds.

Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book.

Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity.

8% below n=6
2 wins in Yorkshire and the Humber9 panel places
£94m15 awards in 36m · last 5 months ago6 live · £114m
i

Public contracts this supplier still holds.

Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book.

Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity.

29% below n=4
5 wins in Yorkshire and the Humber12 panel places
£3.0m22 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago3 live · £1.8m
i

Public contracts this supplier still holds.

Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book.

Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity.

24% above n=1
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Procedure method
Restricted procedure
Legal basis
CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
Procurement category
Works
Notice status
Open admission
Procurement threshold
Unspecified in notice
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Dynamic market
Who may use this agreement
Any qualifying supplier may apply while the market is open
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Yes (GPA)
Recurring procurement
No (one-off requirement)
First published
2 Jun 2025, 15:46 BST
Last source update
2 Jun 2025, 15:46 BST
Authority reference
AVP-RKLT-2011
FTS notice number
2025/S 000-029243
Classification (CPV)
Construction work
Delivery area
UK
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-052ae6 Find a Tender
Review and risk notes
Review procedure

As set out in the Public Contracts Directive 2014/24/EU.

How to participate & submission route

Official notice Apply via In-tend
Submission portal named on this notice: In-tend · Who buys & how to bid on In-tend
Supplier login requiredLanguage: EN
Access & registration note: Free · one account per buying organisation's portal · reCAPTCHA on signup

Tender documents are also served through a separate tool: https://in-tendhost.co.uk/pagabo/aspx/home ↗

Requests to participate (first stage)
—
Admission period ends
23 Feb 2029, 17:00 GMT
Clarification deadline
—
Submission channel
{"electronicSubmission","written"}
Accepted languages
en
Detailed submission instructions & authority contactsFrom official release

Timeline

2 Jun 2025 → 23 Feb 2029 · 2 dates
  1. Notice published
    2 Jun 2025, 15:46 BST
  2. Today
    21 Oct 2026
  3. Admission / appointment period endsperiod end, not a bid countdown
    23 Feb 2029, 17:00 GMT

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Nothing awarded yet
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Red Kite Learning Trust

Contracting authorityPublic bodyEducationEducation Red Kite Office, Pannal Ash Road, HG2 9PH, Harrogate , Yorkshire & Humber, HG2 9PHContact email Published organisation website ↗

Dispute resolution & review bodies

  • High Court of England and Wales Review body London

Official documents & specifications (2)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Tender pack and attachments

  • Economic and financial selection criteriatenderEconomic and financial selection criteria
  • Technical selection criteriatenderTechnical selection criteria