Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 17 Jun 2026, 09:30 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Enforcement Improvement Programme - Identity Resolution - Request for Information (RFI)

Authority: Ministry of Justice (Central government)

ServicesAbove threshold
Planned pipeline value£0pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected Date not publishedfrom the planned procurement notice
Contract term 1 yrends 31 Mar 2028 · starts 5 Apr 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The Ministry of Justice, through His Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS), is undertaking preliminary market engagement as part of the Enforcement Improvement Programme.

Criminal Fines Collection and Enforcement (Enforcement) is the part of HMCTS responsible in the main for the collection and enforcement of financial penalties imposed by the criminal courts and the subsequent disbursement of funds. Financial penalties include fines, costs, victim surcharge, and compensation to victims of crime.

The Enforcement Improvement Programme supports the Criminal Fines Collection and Enforcement vision by improving the end-to-end journey for financial penalties.

The current enforcement model is largely manual and report-driven, with activity involving multiple systems and steps. Staff often review reports, gather data from different sources, interpret information and progress cases. Because information can sit across systems, it may be harder to quickly identify linked accounts, track individuals, understand payment behaviour and prioritise cases. Streamlining data and processes would support more efficient decision-making, reduce rework and help target the most effective interventions.

HMCTS is therefore exploring market capability that could improve the quality, reliability and usability of information available to support enforcement activity, including case progression, account linking, traceability, operational prioritisation, workflow and staff decision support.

The purpose of this Request for Information is to improve HMCTS’ understanding of market capability relating to:

  • data matching and entity resolution;
  • account linking and single person view capability;
  • tracing and contact-data enrichment;
  • segmentation and prioritisation;
  • workflow, rules and operational decision support;
  • enforcement intelligence and management information;
  • auditability, explainability, assurance and human review controls.

Through this RFI, HMCTS is seeking to better understand:

  • available market capability and supplier capacity;
  • how relevant capability is normally delivered, for example through software, data services, platforms, managed technical services, APIs, consultancy, integration support or mixed models;
  • indicative discovery, proof of concept, implementation and delivery approaches;
  • potential routes to market and commercial models;
  • legal, data protection, security and information assurance considerations;
  • indicative costs and cost drivers, timescales, dependencies and risks.

This RFI is deliberately focused on market capability and delivery evidence. HMCTS is not asking suppliers to design the future enforcement model at this stage.

HMCTS is also not seeking to outsource enforcement operations or statutory decision-making through this RFI. Any future capability would need to support HMCTS processes and operate within appropriate policy controls, staff review, auditability, data protection, security and information assurance arrangements.

This RFI is an evidence-gathering activity to support consideration of future needs. It is not a request for a quotation, proposal or tender, and it should not be treated as a commitment to any future procurement.

This notice relates to preliminary market engagement only. The issuing of this RFI:

  • does not constitute a procurement exercise;
  • does not commit HMCTS or MoJ to procure any services, software, data, platforms or solutions;
  • does not indicate any supplier preference;
  • does not create exclusivity or advantage for suppliers who respond;
  • does not prevent non-respondents from participating in any future opportunity, should one arise.

Responses will be used solely to inform HMCTS’ understanding of the market, possible future delivery options, business case development, affordability, assurance considerations and potential next-stage routes.

CPV: Analytical or scientific software package · Business intelligence software development services · Data analysis services · Data services · Information technology services · Investigation and security services · Justice services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Ministry of Justice buys Programming services of packaged software products (CPV 7221), and who usually turns up

Ministry of Justice’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Programming services of packaged software products (CPV 7221) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerMinistry of Justice · division 72
The marketProgramming services of packaged software products (CPV 7221) · Greater London (authority’s region)
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 5 of 10 known-size awards · market: CPV 7221 · Greater London (authority’s region), n=54
50%39%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Here, local means registered in Greater London (authority’s region).

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 6 of 12 known-location awards · market: CPV 7221 · Greater London (authority’s region), n=71
50%44%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in Greater London.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 23 decided notices · market: CPV 7221 · Greater London (authority’s region), n=13
49 days89 days

Half of these awards were announced within 49 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 3 of 16 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 7221 · Greater London (authority’s region), n=86
19%56%

Missing bid counts may hide more single-bid awards. This share is a minimum.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer50 lots with bid counts · all categories
10% had one bid
The market13 lots with bid counts · CPV 7221 · Greater London (authority’s region)
0% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid10% / 0%
Buyer: 5 of 50 lots with published bid counts. Market: 0 of 13 lots with published bid counts.
2–358% / 31%
Buyer: 29 of 50 lots with published bid counts. Market: 4 of 13 lots with published bid counts.
4–620% / 31%
Buyer: 10 of 50 lots with published bid counts. Market: 4 of 13 lots with published bid counts.
7+12% / 38%
Buyer: 6 of 50 lots with published bid counts. Market: 5 of 13 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer27 lots with estimate and award · all categories
56% below estimate
The market12 lots with estimate and award · CPV 7221 · Greater London (authority’s region)
42% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate56% / 42%
Buyer: 15 of 27 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 5 of 12 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%30% / 58%
Buyer: 8 of 27 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 7 of 12 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate15% / 0%
Buyer: 4 of 27 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 0 of 12 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 722112 monthsNo real estimate
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 13 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet0% single-bid risk
Past bids on 13 similar lots
1 bid0%
0 of 13 similar past lots received 1 bid (0%).
2–331%
4 of 13 similar past lots received 2–3 (31%).
4–631%
4 of 13 similar past lots received 4–6 (31%).
7+38%
5 of 13 similar past lots received 7+ (38%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 5 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No real estimate
The buyer published £0 as the estimate (a placeholder, not the contract’s value), so there is nothing to forecast against.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
17 Jun 2026, 09:30 BST
Last source update
7 Jul 2026, 12:23 BST
Authority reference
prj_17636
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-063603
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Analytical or scientific software packageBusiness intelligence software development servicesData analysis servicesData servicesInformation technology servicesInvestigation and security servicesJustice services
Delivery area
Not published
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06b684 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

17 Jun 2026 → 5 Apr 2027 · 4 dates
  1. Planning notice published126 days ago
    17 Jun 2026, 09:30 BST
  2. Latest notice published106 days ago
    7 Jul 2026, 12:23 BST
  3. Market engagement88 days ago
    24 Jul 2026, 23:59 BST

    The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is interested in understanding the market’s capacity and capability to support potential future Enforcement Improvement Programme (EIP) requirements relating to data matching, entity resolution, tracing, segmentation, prioritisation and enforcement intelligence capability.

    The purpose of this notice is to enable suppliers to respond to the RFI.

    Interested parties are required to complete the following actions:

    1. Register for an account through the MoJ Sourcing Portal at ministryofjusticecommercial.bravosolution.co.uk ↗
    2. Navigate to the left side menu and click on 'PQQs Open to All Suppliers' > find and click on ' PQQ_609 - ‘Enforcement Improvement Programme - Identity Resolution - Request for Information (RFI)' - for the avoidance of doubt this is not an actual PQQ just a space on our sourcing system to coordinate market engagement activities. There are no mandatory actions to take.
    3. Suppliers must express an interest by clicking 'Express interest' and will then be able to view the detail relating to market engagement.

    26th June 2026 (Questionnaire issued)

    24th July 2026 (Deadline to submit responses to questionnaire)

    The 'PQQ_609 - ‘Enforcement Improvement Programme - Identity Resolution - Request for Information (RFI)' is being used as a mechanism for the RFI and no feedback or responses to engagement will affect your ability to tender for contracts in the future. Responses are not evaluated. Nothing in this notice shall constitute a commitment to procuring.

    All costs associated with the production of a response to this RFI are the responsibility of your organisation. MoJ will not contribute in any way to meeting costs of any response. MoJ expects that all responses to this engagement opportunity will be provided by the supplier in good faith, to the best of its ability, in light of the information available at the time of response. The Engagement deadline in this notice reflects the closing date for questionnaire submission by Suppliers following the session.

  4. Today
    21 Oct 2026
  5. Contract startsin 166 days
    5 Apr 2027, 00:00 BST

Notice history

2 events · 2 releases on Find a Tender · since 17 Jun 2026
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    17 Jun 2026, 09:30 BST
    UK2
  2. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    7 Jul 2026, 12:23 BST
    UK2
Published amendments (1)

Closing date for participation with this RFI has been extended and amended to 24th July 2026.

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Ministry of Justice

Contracting authorityPublic authority - central government GB-PPON: PDNN-2773-HVYN 102 Petty France, London, London, SW1H 9AJContact email

Official documents & specifications (2)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure