Official UK procurement notice
Contracts for Innovation Cymru - Transforming Multi-Agency Safeguarding for High-Risk Domestic Abuse in South Wales
Authority: NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership-Procurement Services (hosted by Velindre University NHS Trust) (NHS & healthcare)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionDomestic abuse remains one of the most significant public protection challenges facing South Wales. For people assessed as being at highest risk of serious harm or homicide, timely safeguarding interventions and effective multi-agency coordination can be critical in reducing harm and improving safety outcomes.
South Wales Police and its partners currently deliver safeguarding through the Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Conference (MARAC) process. MARAC is a long-established mechanism that brings organisations together to share information, assess risk and coordinate actions for victims experiencing high-risk domestic abuse. It remains one of the most important safeguarding arrangements available to public services and plays a vital role in protecting some of the most vulnerable people in society.
However, the current model is under increasing pressure. Across South Wales, more than 5,000 high-risk domestic abuse cases are managed annually through seven separate MARAC arrangements operating across Cardiff, Vale of Glamorgan, Rhondda Cynon Taf, Merthyr Tydfil, Bridgend, Neath Port Talbot and Swansea. Together, these arrangements account for approximately 44% of MARAC demand across Wales. Different governance structures, processes and operating approaches have evolved over time, resulting in variation in delivery, increasing administrative burden and challenges in maintaining consistency across the region.
Read the full description (5,956 more characters)
Demand continues to increase whilst cases become more complex. In some areas, approximately 70 cases may be discussed during a single weekly MARAC process, and concerns have been raised regarding delays between referral, discussion and action. National reviews, safeguarding investigations and wider research have highlighted issues relating to fragmented information sharing, inconsistent processes and delays in identifying and responding to escalating risk.
South Wales Police, working alongside regional MARAC governance groups, the Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner and wider safeguarding partners, has identified an opportunity to explore whether a different approach could deliver faster, more consistent and more effective safeguarding outcomes. The challenge has been developed following significant stakeholder engagement and reflects a shared recognition that future approaches may need to move beyond the traditional meeting-based MARAC model.
________________________________________
The Challenge
We are seeking innovative organisations to help South Wales Police and its partners explore how high-risk domestic abuse safeguarding could operate differently in the future.
This challenge is intentionally outcome-focused and does not prescribe a specific technology, product type or delivery model.
Applicants are encouraged to propose the approach they believe will best address the challenge and demonstrate how their expertise could help develop a more responsive, coordinated and sustainable safeguarding model for South Wales.
The challenge is not simply about introducing new technology or digitising existing MARAC meetings. Whilst technology, data and artificial intelligence may form part of the solution, partners have identified the need to explore wider service, governance and operating model redesign.
We are interested in organisations capable of helping answer questions such as:
• How can risk be identified, prioritised and escalated more effectively?
• How can organisations work together more dynamically and efficiently?
• How can safeguarding actions be coordinated more effectively across agencies?
• How can professionals spend less time managing administration and more time safeguarding vulnerable people?
• How can information be shared more effectively whilst maintaining appropriate governance and accountability?
• How can future models remain practical, affordable and sustainable?
• How can innovation support improved safeguarding outcomes without creating additional complexity?
Applicants should not assume that technology alone is the answer. We welcome proposals that combine service design, systems thinking, operational redesign, governance innovation, behavioural approaches, digital innovation, data, analytics and artificial intelligence to explore how multi-agency safeguarding could evolve.
________________________________________
Desired Outcomes
We are interested in approaches that can contribute towards measurable improvements in one or more of the following areas.
Safeguarding Outcomes
• Earlier identification of escalating risk.
• Faster safeguarding interventions.
• Improved protection for people at highest risk of harm.
• Reduced repeat victimisation.
• Improved management of complex and repeat cases.
• Better safeguarding outcomes for victims and families.
Victim Experience
• More consistent safeguarding support regardless of location.
• Improved coordination between agencies.
• Reduced delays in accessing support.
• More responsive safeguarding interventions.
• Improved confidence in safeguarding processes.
• More person-centred approaches to safety planning.
Professional Practice
• Reduced administrative burden.
• Better access to relevant information.
• Improved coordination and communication between organisations.
• Better visibility of decisions and actions.
• Improved accountability and action tracking.
• More professional time focused on safeguarding activity.
Service Delivery and Equity
• Reduced variation between different MARAC arrangements.
• More consistent safeguarding approaches across South Wales.
• Improved information sharing.
• Better visibility of risk.
• More equitable safeguarding outcomes regardless of geography.
• Improved partnership working.
System Outcomes
• Better use of public resources.
• Reduced duplication of activity.
• Improved operational intelligence.
• Improved governance and oversight.
• Stronger evidence for future service transformation.
• Improved understanding and measurement of safeguarding outcomes.
Sustainability
• Affordable and scalable approaches.
• Long-term sustainability beyond the funded project period.
• A realistic route to implementation.
• Approaches capable of supporting future adoption in other regions where appropriate.
• Creation of capability that can support future safeguarding transformation.
Applicants should clearly identify which outcomes their project is expected to influence and explain how impact will be assessed.
Phase 1: Discovery and Concept Development
This challenge is being delivered as a Phase 1 Contracts for Innovation Cymru competition.
South Wales Police and partners recognise that this is a complex system challenge. Whilst the need for change has been identified, there is not yet a single agreed solution or future model. This competition is therefore focused on discovery, exploration, evidence generation and concept development.
We are seeking organisations capable of helping define what a future safeguarding model might look like, which has the potential for scalability across other MARAC areas and what practical steps may be required to implement it.
Funding Allocation and Project Details
Competition Type: Phase 1 Discovery and Concept Development
Funding Available: Up to £60k per project
Number of Projects: Up to 6 projects
The total funding available for the competition can change and the funders reserve the right to adjust the provisional funding allocations, i.e., should additional funding become available
- No preliminary market engagement: Suppliers within market known
CPV: Health and social work services · Market research services · Medical equipments, pharmaceuticals and personal care products · Other community, social and personal services · Research and development services and related consultancy services · Software package and information systems
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · value publishedLot #1Lot 1Published value£300,000
- Value
- £300,000 exc. VAT · £360,000 inc. VAT
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published — the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Published sub-criteria (3)
- Technical — 87%
- Commercial — 9%
- Social Value — 4%
Published award criteria (3)
- Technical — Technical elements of contract
- Commercial — Overall cost and value for money
- Social Value — Project delivers measurable economic, social, environmental and cultural benefits for Wales, beyond the core requirements of the contract
- Economic & financial standingPlease refer to the draft contract in the tender docs available via the Simply Do Portal: https://sbri.simplydo.co.uk/challenges/6aad513d3a9da487dc6df273
- Technical & professional abilityPlease refer to the draft contract in the tender docs available via https://sbri.simplydo.co.uk/challenges/6aad513d3a9da487dc6df273
Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid
How NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership-Procurement Services (hosted by Velindre University NHS Trust) buys Market research services (CPV 7931) — and who usually turns up
NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership-Procurement Services (hosted by Velindre University NHS Trust)’s own published record, next to the Wales (Cymru) market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Market research services (CPV 7931) →
How the contest usually goes
Left: this authority. Right: the market where the work is delivered. Bids and award-vs-estimate pairs are per lot, from contested contracts only — direct awards (including PA 2023 transparency notices) report one bid by definition and are left out. On Procurement Act 2023 notices the count is the tenders assessed at the final stage, not every submission received; pairs compare like with like (VAT-exclusive, or VAT-inclusive on both sides). Empty means nothing was published, not filled in from elsewhere.
NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership-Procurement Services (hosted by Velindre University NHS Trust)
contract notices in 36 months: 1 in CPV 7931 · 5 in division 79 (1 route not published) · 131 in all categories (40 without competition · 15 route not published)
i
How many companies usually bid for work like this.
Middle value of published bid counts, one per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.
Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 79), last 36 months: 3 lots. All 3 lots are from older notices, which count bids received.
Nothing is filled in from UK-wide numbers. An empty tile means nothing usable was published.
i
How often only one company bid.
Share of lots that received exactly one bid, on the same competitions as the bids figure.
Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 79), last 36 months: 3 lots.
High means a thin market or an incumbent that is hard to beat.
i
Do awards for work like this land above or below the estimate.
Estimate against award per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.
Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 10 pairs.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 9 notices.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 24 months: 69 notices.
i
How often this buyer awards without a competition.
Direct or limited awards as a share of its notices that say which procedure was used. These routes are legal in defined cases. This is just the record.
Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 79), last 36 months: 4 notices.
Wales (Cymru) · Market research services (CPV 7931)
contract notices delivered in Wales (Cymru) in 36 months: 52 in CPV 7931 (49 competed) · 466 in division 79 (362 competed, 47 route not published)
i
How many companies usually bid for work like this.
Middle value of published bid counts, one per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.
Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 27 lots. 13 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 9) and 14 from older notices (bids received, middle 3).
Nothing is filled in from UK-wide numbers. An empty tile means nothing usable was published.
i
How often only one company bid.
Share of lots that received exactly one bid, on the same competitions as the bids figure.
Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 27 lots.
High means a thin market or an incumbent that is hard to beat.
i
Do awards for work like this land above or below the estimate.
Estimate against award per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.
Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 24 pairs.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 14 notices.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
i
How much of this market goes to small and medium firms.
SME bidders where buyers published the split, otherwise SME winners.
Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 26 lots.
i
How much work like this goes to companies based in the delivery region.
Awards in this category delivered here where the winner’s registered address is in the region.
Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 28 awards.
Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.
i
Where this tender’s estimate would land if the usual pattern repeats.
We apply the buyer’s usual movement between estimate and award (or the region’s) to the estimate on this notice.
Based on this buyer’s own usual movement over 10 lots (all categories), applied to the £300,000 estimate on this notice.
A benchmark, not a price to bid.
Coverage and what to read with care
- Each tile explains itself. The on a figure says what it is, how it is counted and which scope this notice’s own record came from (class, division, all categories, or the authority’s 24-month row). The two columns are never blended and nothing is filled from a UK-wide figure; an empty tile means the source published nothing usable. Long form: Methodology.
- Coverage. Roughly 40 % of notices publish a bid count; about half publish an ITL1 delivery location, so the market column reads the authority’s registered region when the notice has none (labelled). About 30 % of award-vs-estimate pairs are exact matches — the buyer published the award at the estimate. n is on every figure; a thin sample is muted, never hidden.
- “Match” and “relevance” are model scores from the nightly matcher, not published facts. Find a Tender does not publish who is bidding. Never shown: contact details, payment behaviour, or a recommended price.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Open procedure
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Open for tender
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Yes (GPA)
- Recurring procurement
- No (one-off requirement)
- First published
- 22 Sept 2026, 11:58 BST
- Last source update
- 22 Sept 2026, 11:58 BST
- Award evaluation window
- Submission end — 30 Oct 2026, 23:59 GMT
- Latest notice
- Tender notice (UK4)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-07775cFind a Tender- Contract terms summary
- 30 days after approval of deliverables completion
- Risks
- Time constraints Legislatory / Regulatory compliance Failure to complete agreed deliverables to a sufficient standard and within agreed timescales Failure to adhere to agreed budget
How to participate & submission route
Official notice Submit via portal- Expression of interest (EOI)
- —
- Tender submission deadline
- 20 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
- Clarification deadline
- 16 Oct 2026, 00:00 BST
- Submission channel
- Official e-sourcing portal
- Electronic submission
- Allowed
- Accepted languages
- cy, en
Timeline
5 published dates · Europe/London- Tender notice publishedearlier today22 Sept 2026, 11:58 BST
- Clarification questions byin 23 days16 Oct 2026, 00:00 BST
- Submission deadlinein 28 days20 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
- Award decision expected byin 38 days30 Oct 2026, 23:59 GMT
- Contract startsin 54 days16 Nov 2026, 00:00 GMT
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Nothing awarded yet- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Tender notice published22 Sept 2026, 11:58 BSTUK4
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (5)
Official links; attachments are not copiedTender pack and attachments
- Bidding documents and specifications Transforming MARAC Domestic Abuse_ Challenge Brief_ English
- Bidding documents and specifications Transforming MARAC Domestic Abuse_ Challenge Brief _ Welsh
- Technical specifications All technical requirements and relevant documentation can be accessed on the Simply Do Portal
- Conflict of interest declarationNot published
Notices published for this procedure
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender