Find a TenderOpen for tender Tender notice
Published 22 Sept 2026, 11:58 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Contracts for Innovation Cymru - Transforming Multi-Agency Safeguarding for High-Risk Domestic Abuse in South Wales

Authority: NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership-Procurement Services (hosted by Velindre University NHS Trust) (NHS & healthcare)

ServicesOpen procedureAbove thresholdSME suitableVCSE suitable
Published estimate£300,000£360,000 inc. VAT
Submission deadline 20 Oct 202612:00 BST · 27d 12h left
Clarification cut-off 16 Oct 2026questions to the authority
Contract term 4 mostarts 16 Nov 2026
Bids per lot · this authority 5division 79 · n=3 · competition analysis ↓

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Domestic abuse remains one of the most significant public protection challenges facing South Wales. For people assessed as being at highest risk of serious harm or homicide, timely safeguarding interventions and effective multi-agency coordination can be critical in reducing harm and improving safety outcomes.

South Wales Police and its partners currently deliver safeguarding through the Multi-Agency Risk Assessment Conference (MARAC) process. MARAC is a long-established mechanism that brings organisations together to share information, assess risk and coordinate actions for victims experiencing high-risk domestic abuse. It remains one of the most important safeguarding arrangements available to public services and plays a vital role in protecting some of the most vulnerable people in society.

However, the current model is under increasing pressure. Across South Wales, more than 5,000 high-risk domestic abuse cases are managed annually through seven separate MARAC arrangements operating across Cardiff, Vale of Glamorgan, Rhondda Cynon Taf, Merthyr Tydfil, Bridgend, Neath Port Talbot and Swansea. Together, these arrangements account for approximately 44% of MARAC demand across Wales. Different governance structures, processes and operating approaches have evolved over time, resulting in variation in delivery, increasing administrative burden and challenges in maintaining consistency across the region.

Read the full description (5,956 more characters)

Demand continues to increase whilst cases become more complex. In some areas, approximately 70 cases may be discussed during a single weekly MARAC process, and concerns have been raised regarding delays between referral, discussion and action. National reviews, safeguarding investigations and wider research have highlighted issues relating to fragmented information sharing, inconsistent processes and delays in identifying and responding to escalating risk.

South Wales Police, working alongside regional MARAC governance groups, the Office of the Police and Crime Commissioner and wider safeguarding partners, has identified an opportunity to explore whether a different approach could deliver faster, more consistent and more effective safeguarding outcomes. The challenge has been developed following significant stakeholder engagement and reflects a shared recognition that future approaches may need to move beyond the traditional meeting-based MARAC model.

________________________________________

The Challenge

We are seeking innovative organisations to help South Wales Police and its partners explore how high-risk domestic abuse safeguarding could operate differently in the future.

This challenge is intentionally outcome-focused and does not prescribe a specific technology, product type or delivery model.

Applicants are encouraged to propose the approach they believe will best address the challenge and demonstrate how their expertise could help develop a more responsive, coordinated and sustainable safeguarding model for South Wales.

The challenge is not simply about introducing new technology or digitising existing MARAC meetings. Whilst technology, data and artificial intelligence may form part of the solution, partners have identified the need to explore wider service, governance and operating model redesign.

We are interested in organisations capable of helping answer questions such as:

• How can risk be identified, prioritised and escalated more effectively?

• How can organisations work together more dynamically and efficiently?

• How can safeguarding actions be coordinated more effectively across agencies?

• How can professionals spend less time managing administration and more time safeguarding vulnerable people?

• How can information be shared more effectively whilst maintaining appropriate governance and accountability?

• How can future models remain practical, affordable and sustainable?

• How can innovation support improved safeguarding outcomes without creating additional complexity?

Applicants should not assume that technology alone is the answer. We welcome proposals that combine service design, systems thinking, operational redesign, governance innovation, behavioural approaches, digital innovation, data, analytics and artificial intelligence to explore how multi-agency safeguarding could evolve.

________________________________________

Desired Outcomes

We are interested in approaches that can contribute towards measurable improvements in one or more of the following areas.

Safeguarding Outcomes

• Earlier identification of escalating risk.

• Faster safeguarding interventions.

• Improved protection for people at highest risk of harm.

• Reduced repeat victimisation.

• Improved management of complex and repeat cases.

• Better safeguarding outcomes for victims and families.

Victim Experience

• More consistent safeguarding support regardless of location.

• Improved coordination between agencies.

• Reduced delays in accessing support.

• More responsive safeguarding interventions.

• Improved confidence in safeguarding processes.

• More person-centred approaches to safety planning.

Professional Practice

• Reduced administrative burden.

• Better access to relevant information.

• Improved coordination and communication between organisations.

• Better visibility of decisions and actions.

• Improved accountability and action tracking.

• More professional time focused on safeguarding activity.

Service Delivery and Equity

• Reduced variation between different MARAC arrangements.

• More consistent safeguarding approaches across South Wales.

• Improved information sharing.

• Better visibility of risk.

• More equitable safeguarding outcomes regardless of geography.

• Improved partnership working.

System Outcomes

• Better use of public resources.

• Reduced duplication of activity.

• Improved operational intelligence.

• Improved governance and oversight.

• Stronger evidence for future service transformation.

• Improved understanding and measurement of safeguarding outcomes.

Sustainability

• Affordable and scalable approaches.

• Long-term sustainability beyond the funded project period.

• A realistic route to implementation.

• Approaches capable of supporting future adoption in other regions where appropriate.

• Creation of capability that can support future safeguarding transformation.

Applicants should clearly identify which outcomes their project is expected to influence and explain how impact will be assessed.

Phase 1: Discovery and Concept Development

This challenge is being delivered as a Phase 1 Contracts for Innovation Cymru competition.

South Wales Police and partners recognise that this is a complex system challenge. Whilst the need for change has been identified, there is not yet a single agreed solution or future model. This competition is therefore focused on discovery, exploration, evidence generation and concept development.

We are seeking organisations capable of helping define what a future safeguarding model might look like, which has the potential for scalability across other MARAC areas and what practical steps may be required to implement it.

Funding Allocation and Project Details

Competition Type: Phase 1 Discovery and Concept Development

Funding Available: Up to £60k per project

Number of Projects: Up to 6 projects

The total funding available for the competition can change and the funders reserve the right to adjust the provisional funding allocations, i.e., should additional funding become available

  • No preliminary market engagement: Suppliers within market known

CPV: Health and social work services · Market research services · Medical equipments, pharmaceuticals and personal care products · Other community, social and personal services · Research and development services and related consultancy services · Software package and information systems

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · value published
Lot #1Lot 1 4 moSMEVCSEPublished value£300,000
Contract period: 16 Nov 2026 — 31 Mar 2027 (4 mo)Eligibility: SME eligibleVCSE eligibleDelivery: WalesTurnover guideline: ~£600,000/yr≈ 2× annual value
Value
£300,000 exc. VAT · £360,000 inc. VAT
33000000 Medical equipments, pharmaceuticals and personal care products48000000 Software package and information systems73000000 Research and development services and related consultancy services79310000 Market research services85000000 Health and social work services98000000 Other community, social and personal services

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

What it takes to win
i

How this buyer will score bids.

The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).

Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published — the tender pack may add more
How bids are scored
Quality: 87%Price: 9%Social value: 4%
Published sub-criteria (3)
  • Technical87%
  • Commercial9%
  • Social Value4%
Published award criteria (3)
  • Technical Technical elements of contract
  • Commercial Overall cost and value for money
  • Social ValueProject delivers measurable economic, social, environmental and cultural benefits for Wales, beyond the core requirements of the contract
Conditions of participation2
  • Economic & financial standing
    Please refer to the draft contract in the tender docs available via the Simply Do Portal: https://sbri.simplydo.co.uk/challenges/6aad513d3a9da487dc6df273
  • Technical & professional ability
    Please refer to the draft contract in the tender docs available via https://sbri.simplydo.co.uk/challenges/6aad513d3a9da487dc6df273

Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid

How NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership-Procurement Services (hosted by Velindre University NHS Trust) buys Market research services (CPV 7931) — and who usually turns up

NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership-Procurement Services (hosted by Velindre University NHS Trust)’s own published record, next to the Wales (Cymru) market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Market research services (CPV 7931)

1

How the contest usually goes

Left: this authority. Right: the market where the work is delivered. Bids and award-vs-estimate pairs are per lot, from contested contracts only — direct awards (including PA 2023 transparency notices) report one bid by definition and are left out. On Procurement Act 2023 notices the count is the tenders assessed at the final stage, not every submission received; pairs compare like with like (VAT-exclusive, or VAT-inclusive on both sides). Empty means nothing was published, not filled in from elsewhere.

This authority

NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership-Procurement Services (hosted by Velindre University NHS Trust)

contract notices in 36 months: 1 in CPV 7931 · 5 in division 79 (1 route not published) · 131 in all categories (40 without competition · 15 route not published)

Bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for work like this.

Middle value of published bid counts, one per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 79), last 36 months: 3 lots. All 3 lots are from older notices, which count bids received.

Nothing is filled in from UK-wide numbers. An empty tile means nothing usable was published.

5division 79 · 36m · n=3 lots
Single-bid lots
i

How often only one company bid.

Share of lots that received exactly one bid, on the same competitions as the bids figure.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 79), last 36 months: 3 lots.

High means a thin market or an incumbent that is hard to beat.

0%division 79 · 36m · n=3 lots
Award vs estimate
i

Do awards for work like this land above or below the estimate.

Estimate against award per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 10 pairs.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

7% belowall categories · 36m · n=10 pairs
Deadline → award date
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 9 notices.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

76dall categories · 36m · n=9 notices
Notice updates
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 24 months: 69 notices.

Last 24 months.

0all categories · 24m · n=69 notices
Awarded without competition
i

How often this buyer awards without a competition.

Direct or limited awards as a share of its notices that say which procedure was used. These routes are legal in defined cases. This is just the record.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 79), last 36 months: 4 notices.

Last 36 months.

0%division 79 · 36m · n=4 notices
Bids per lot moderate · n=3
i

How the number of bidders is spread across lots.

Each lot with a published bid count is put in a band: one bid, two to three, four to six, seven or more. Real competitions only.

Based on 3 lots on 2 contested notices · division 79, last 36 months.

  • 1 bid 0%
  • 2–3 33%
  • 4–6 67%
  • 7+ 0%

Median 5 · 3 lots on 2 contested notices · division 79.

Winning award vs estimate robust · n=10
i

How often winners come in below, near or above the estimate.

Each lot with both an estimate and an award is placed by how far the award sat from the estimate.

Based on 10 lot pairs · all categories, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

  • Below estimate 60%
  • Within ±2% 20%
  • Above estimate 20%

10 lot pairs · all categories.

The market · delivery region

Wales (Cymru) · Market research services (CPV 7931)

contract notices delivered in Wales (Cymru) in 36 months: 52 in CPV 7931 (49 competed) · 466 in division 79 (362 competed, 47 route not published)

Bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for work like this.

Middle value of published bid counts, one per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 27 lots. 13 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 9) and 14 from older notices (bids received, middle 3).

Nothing is filled in from UK-wide numbers. An empty tile means nothing usable was published.

4CPV 7931 · 36m · n=27 lots
Single-bid lots
i

How often only one company bid.

Share of lots that received exactly one bid, on the same competitions as the bids figure.

Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 27 lots.

High means a thin market or an incumbent that is hard to beat.

11%CPV 7931 · 36m · n=27 lots
Award vs estimate
i

Do awards for work like this land above or below the estimate.

Estimate against award per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 24 pairs.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

8% belowCPV 7931 · 36m · n=24 pairs
Deadline → award date
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 14 notices.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

29dCPV 7931 · 36m · n=14 notices
SME bidders
i

How much of this market goes to small and medium firms.

SME bidders where buyers published the split, otherwise SME winners.

Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 26 lots.

Last 36 months.

49%CPV 7931 · 36m · n=26 lots
Winners based in the region
i

How much work like this goes to companies based in the delivery region.

Awards in this category delivered here where the winner’s registered address is in the region.

Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 28 awards.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

50%CPV 7931 · 36m · n=28 awards
Bids per lot robust · n=27
i

How the number of bidders is spread across lots.

Each lot with a published bid count is put in a band: one bid, two to three, four to six, seven or more. Real competitions only.

Based on 27 lots on 26 contested notices · CPV 7931, last 36 months.

  • 1 bid 11%
  • 2–3 26%
  • 4–6 30%
  • 7+ 33%

Median 4 · 27 lots on 26 contested notices · CPV 7931.

Winning award vs estimate robust · n=24
i

How often winners come in below, near or above the estimate.

Each lot with both an estimate and an award is placed by how far the award sat from the estimate.

Based on 24 lot pairs · CPV 7931, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

  • Below estimate 67%
  • Within ±2% 29%
  • Above estimate 4%

24 lot pairs · CPV 7931.

robust · n=10
i

Where this tender’s estimate would land if the usual pattern repeats.

We apply the buyer’s usual movement between estimate and award (or the region’s) to the estimate on this notice.

Based on this buyer’s own usual movement over 10 lots (all categories), applied to the £300,000 estimate on this notice.

A benchmark, not a price to bid.

Awards in NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership-Procurement Services (hosted by Velindre University NHS Trust) (all categories, n=10 pairs) land a median 7% below: on this notice’s £300,000 that is about £278,100. Context for a bid, not a recommended price.
Coverage and what to read with care
  • Each tile explains itself. The on a figure says what it is, how it is counted and which scope this notice’s own record came from (class, division, all categories, or the authority’s 24-month row). The two columns are never blended and nothing is filled from a UK-wide figure; an empty tile means the source published nothing usable. Long form: Methodology.
  • Coverage. Roughly 40 % of notices publish a bid count; about half publish an ITL1 delivery location, so the market column reads the authority’s registered region when the notice has none (labelled). About 30 % of award-vs-estimate pairs are exact matches — the buyer published the award at the estimate. n is on every figure; a thin sample is muted, never hidden.
  • “Match” and “relevance” are model scores from the nightly matcher, not published facts. Find a Tender does not publish who is bidding. Never shown: contact details, payment behaviour, or a recommended price.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Procedure method
Open procedure
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Open for tender
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Yes (GPA)
Recurring procurement
No (one-off requirement)
First published
22 Sept 2026, 11:58 BST
Last source update
22 Sept 2026, 11:58 BST
Award evaluation window
Submission end — 30 Oct 2026, 23:59 GMT
Latest notice
Tender notice (UK4)
Classification (CPV)
Health and social work servicesMarket research servicesMedical equipments, pharmaceuticals and personal care productsOther community, social and personal servicesResearch and development services and related consultancy servicesSoftware package and information systems
Delivery area
Wales (UKL)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-07775c Find a Tender
Contract terms summary
30 days after approval of deliverables completion
Review and risk notes
Risks
Time constraints Legislatory / Regulatory compliance Failure to complete agreed deliverables to a sufficient standard and within agreed timescales Failure to adhere to agreed budget

How to participate & submission route

Official notice Submit via portal
Submission portal named on this notice: portal not identified
Electronic submission allowedLanguage: CY, EN
Expression of interest (EOI)
Tender submission deadline
20 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
Clarification deadline
16 Oct 2026, 00:00 BST
Submission channel
Official e-sourcing portal
Electronic submission
Allowed
Accepted languages
cy, en
Detailed submission instructions & authority contactsFrom official release
Published estimate £300,000 excludes VAT (£360,000 including VAT).

Timeline

5 published dates · Europe/London
  1. Tender notice publishedearlier today
    22 Sept 2026, 11:58 BST
  2. Clarification questions byin 23 days
    16 Oct 2026, 00:00 BST
  3. Submission deadlinein 28 days
    20 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
  4. Award decision expected byin 38 days
    30 Oct 2026, 23:59 GMT
  5. Contract startsin 54 days
    16 Nov 2026, 00:00 GMT

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Nothing awarded yet
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Tender notice published
    22 Sept 2026, 11:58 BSTUK4

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board

Contracting authorityPublic authority - central governmentWelsh devolved regulations apply GB-PPON: PHBY-3981-QBMR Headquarters, Ysbyty Gwynedd, Penrhosgarnedd, Bangor, Wales, LL57 2PW [email protected]

Official documents & specifications (5)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Tender pack and attachments

  • Bidding documents and specifications tenderBidding documents and specificationsTransforming MARAC Domestic Abuse_ Challenge Brief_ English
  • Bidding documents and specifications tenderBidding documents and specificationsTransforming MARAC Domestic Abuse_ Challenge Brief _ Welsh
  • Technical specifications tenderTechnical specificationsAll technical requirements and relevant documentation can be accessed on the Simply Do Portal
  • Conflict of interest declarationtenderConflict of interest declarationNot published

Notices published for this procedure

  • Tender notice tenderTender noticeUK4Tender notice on Find a Tender