Official UK procurement notice
Contracts for Innovation Cymru - Ending Abandonment After Stroke
Authority: Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (Education)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionStroke is one of the leading causes of disability in Wales and affects around 7,000 people each year. While survival rates continue to improve, many people experience a significant reduction in support once they leave hospital at a stage when rehabilitation remains critical to recovery and long-term independence. Around 45% of stroke survivors report feeling abandoned following discharge because they do not receive the support they need to recover well.
The impact extends far beyond the individual. Variations in access to rehabilitation, follow-up support and community services can lead to poorer outcomes, increased carer burden, avoidable demand on health and care services, and significant societal and economic costs. Stroke currently costs NHS Wales approximately £220 million per year and the wider Welsh economy approximately £1.63 billion annually. Without intervention, these costs are expected to increase significantly.
The challenge has been developed following extensive investigation across Wales involving clinicians, health boards, national leaders, stroke survivors, carers and the Stroke Association. This work has helped define the challenge, identify unmet needs, understand existing service variation and explore the current market landscape. The conclusion is clear: Wales requires innovative, scalable approaches that can strengthen recovery, improve experience, reduce feelings of abandonment and support more equitable outcomes beyond hospital discharge.
Read the full description (5,805 more characters)
The challenge aligns with the Welsh Government Quality Statement for Stroke, which places renewed emphasis on rehabilitation, recovery, person-centred care and ensuring that stroke survivors do not feel abandoned during their recovery journey.
The Challenge
We are seeking innovative solutions that can improve rehabilitation, recovery and long-term support for stroke survivors.
Access to rehabilitation and follow-up support varies across Wales. As a result, outcomes can depend too heavily on where a person lives rather than on their clinical need. This challenge seeks innovative approaches that can improve equity of access and help ensure people can receive high-quality rehabilitation and recovery support regardless of geography, including those living in rural, remote, underserved and seldom heard communities across Wales.
The challenge is outcome-focused and does not prescribe a specific technology, product type or delivery model.
Applicants are encouraged to propose the approach they believe will best address the challenge and demonstrate how their solution could be adapted, developed or enhanced to meet the needs of NHS Wales and stroke survivors.
We are not seeking to specify a single solution in advance. The purpose of this challenge is to support the development, demonstration and evaluation of innovative approaches that can improve recovery, reduce feelings of abandonment and create foundations for sustainable improvement across Wales.
Particular consideration should be given to how solutions can improve access to rehabilitation and recovery support for people who may face barriers associated with geography, transport, service availability, digital exclusion, workforce capacity or being within a seldom-heard group.
The challenge is not simply about providing more therapy. We are interested in approaches that enable personalised, continuous and motivating rehabilitation and self-management support across home, community and outpatient settings whilst supporting better experiences and outcomes for stroke survivors.
This challenge is being delivered as a Phase 2 Contracts for Innovation competition. In contrast to a Phase 1 competition, focusing on feasibility, we are seeking organisations with existing technologies, products, platforms, services or rehabilitation approaches that require adaptation, enhancement, configuration or further development to address the identified needs of stroke survivors, carers and rehabilitation services across Wales.
This challenge follows significant investigation and engagement to understand the problem, review evidence, define requirements and explore potential market solutions. We are therefore seeking solutions with an established foundation. Early-stage concepts requiring fundamental research or proof-of-concept development are unlikely to be supported
Projects should support the development, adaptation and real-world demonstration of innovative approaches capable of improving rehabilitation, recovery and life after stroke.
Successful projects are expected to generate practical evidence relating to:
• Patient and carer outcomes.
• Rehabilitation outcomes.
• User experience.
• Service and workforce impact.
• Affordability and sustainability.
• Adoption readiness.
• Future scalability.
Applicants should describe in-detail:
• What they propose to deliver.
• How it will be tested and evaluated.
• How impact will be measured.
• How the solution could evolve in future.
• A core delivery plan to 31 March 2027, including activities, milestones, deliverables and costs.
Applicants should describe in outline:
• A separate proposal for a potential further stage beyond April 2027, including the additional activities, deliverables, outcomes, milestones, timescales and costs.
• How the further stage would build on the evidence and learning generated during the core project.
• What additional value the further stage would deliver for stroke survivors, services and the wider recovery pathway.
• How the core project would remain viable and deliver meaningful outputs if further funding does not become available.
Funding Allocation and Project Details
Competition Type: Phase 2 Development and Real-World Demonstration
Funding Available: £300,000 Total budget to support a portfolio of projects
The total funding available for the competition can change and the funders reserve the right to adjust the provisional funding allocations, i.e., should additional funding become available.
Number of Projects: Current funding is available to support a portfolio of projects, dependent upon the number/quality of submissions received.
Portfolio Approach
Funding decisions may be made using a portfolio approach, recognising that improving recovery and reducing abandonment after stroke is a complex challenge that may benefit from multiple complementary solutions rather than a single intervention.
Consideration may be given to the overall balance of projects supported, the evidence generated, opportunities for collaboration between projects and the potential for wider adoption and learning across Wales.
Solutions may address different aspects of rehabilitation, self-management, recovery, service coordination, family support, accessibility, digital capability, assistive technology, data, analytics or outcomes measurement. Collectively, these may contribute towards the wider ambition of improving life after stroke across Wales.
Potential further funding: Additional funding may become available to support a further stage of development or demonstration beyond April 2027. This funding is not currently confirmed and should not be assumed as part of the initial project award. Any decision to provide further funding would be subject to funding availability, project performance, evidence of value and the priorities of the challenge partners.
- No preliminary market engagement: Suppliers within market known
CPV: Health and social work services · Market research services · Medical equipments, pharmaceuticals and personal care products · Other community, social and personal services · Research and development services and related consultancy services · Software package and information systems
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · value publishedLot #1Lot 1Published value£300,000
- Value
- £300,000 exc. VAT · £360,000 inc. VAT
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published — the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Published sub-criteria (3)
- Technical — 87%
- Commercial — 9%
- Social Value — 4%
Published award criteria (3)
- Technical — Technical elements of contract
- Commercial — Overall cost and value for money
- Social Value — Project delivers measurable economic, social, environmental and cultural benefits for Wales, beyond the core requirements of the contract
- Economic & financial standingPlease refer to the draft contract in the tender docs available via: https://sbri.simplydo.co.uk/challenges/6aad46dcc0f015cb8c472f5b
- Technical & professional abilityPlease refer to the draft contract in the tender docs available via: https://sbri.simplydo.co.uk/challenges/6aad46dcc0f015cb8c472f5b
Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid
How Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board buys Market research services (CPV 7931) — and who usually turns up
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board’s own published record, next to the Wales (Cymru) market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Market research services (CPV 7931) →
How the contest usually goes
Left: this authority. Right: the market where the work is delivered. Bids and award-vs-estimate pairs are per lot, from contested contracts only — direct awards (including PA 2023 transparency notices) report one bid by definition and are left out. On Procurement Act 2023 notices the count is the tenders assessed at the final stage, not every submission received; pairs compare like with like (VAT-exclusive, or VAT-inclusive on both sides). Empty means nothing was published, not filled in from elsewhere.
Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
contract notices in 36 months: 5 in CPV 7931 · 9 in division 79 (1 route not published) · 139 in all categories (41 without competition · 15 route not published)
i
How many companies usually bid for work like this.
Middle value of published bid counts, one per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.
Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 79), last 36 months: 3 lots. All 3 lots are from older notices, which count bids received.
Nothing is filled in from UK-wide numbers. An empty tile means nothing usable was published.
i
How often only one company bid.
Share of lots that received exactly one bid, on the same competitions as the bids figure.
Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 79), last 36 months: 3 lots.
High means a thin market or an incumbent that is hard to beat.
i
Do awards for work like this land above or below the estimate.
Estimate against award per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.
Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 13 pairs.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 10 notices.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 24 months: 77 notices.
i
How often this buyer awards without a competition.
Direct or limited awards as a share of its notices that say which procedure was used. These routes are legal in defined cases. This is just the record.
Based on this buyer’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 5 notices.
Wales (Cymru) · Market research services (CPV 7931)
contract notices delivered in Wales (Cymru) in 36 months: 57 in CPV 7931 (53 competed, 1 route not published) · 472 in division 79 (367 competed, 48 route not published)
i
How many companies usually bid for work like this.
Middle value of published bid counts, one per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.
Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 27 lots. 13 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 9) and 14 from older notices (bids received, middle 3).
Nothing is filled in from UK-wide numbers. An empty tile means nothing usable was published.
i
How often only one company bid.
Share of lots that received exactly one bid, on the same competitions as the bids figure.
Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 27 lots.
High means a thin market or an incumbent that is hard to beat.
i
Do awards for work like this land above or below the estimate.
Estimate against award per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.
Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 24 pairs.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 14 notices.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
i
How much of this market goes to small and medium firms.
SME bidders where buyers published the split, otherwise SME winners.
Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 26 lots.
i
How much work like this goes to companies based in the delivery region.
Awards in this category delivered here where the winner’s registered address is in the region.
Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 7931), last 36 months: 28 awards.
Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.
i
Where this tender’s estimate would land if the usual pattern repeats.
We apply the buyer’s usual movement between estimate and award (or the region’s) to the estimate on this notice.
Based on this buyer’s own usual movement over 13 lots (all categories), applied to the £300,000 estimate on this notice.
A benchmark, not a price to bid.
Who you are likely to meet i
Who you may be up against.
Suppliers on this buyer’s earlier similar contracts, and suppliers whose record fits this tender.
A guess from the record. Buyers do not publish who is bidding.
i
Who you may be up against.
Suppliers on this buyer’s earlier similar contracts, and suppliers whose record fits this tender.
A guess from the record. Buyers do not publish who is bidding.
Suppliers on this authority’s earlier similar contracts, then suppliers with a matching track record — from published award history, not a bid list
Suppliers with a similar track record — and how they price i
Suppliers with a similar track record, and how they price.
Suppliers matched on wins in this category, history with this buyer, location and size. Their award vs estimate is from their own past wins.
A guess from the record, not a bidder list.
i
Suppliers with a similar track record, and how they price.
Suppliers matched on wins in this category, history with this buyer, location and size. Their award vs estimate is from their own past wins.
A guess from the record, not a bidder list.
| Supplier | Evidence | Last award | Their award vs estimate | Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DJS Research Ltd SME | 18 class wins | this month | no comparable pairs | 53% |
| Ipsos Large | 59 class wins | this month | no comparable pairs | 53% |
| VERIAN GROUP UK LIMITED Large | 8 class wins | this month | no comparable pairs | 52% |
| Community Research Limited SME | 5 class wins | 1 months ago | at estimate n=1 | 51% |
| IN-HOUSE RESEARCH LIMITED SME | 4 class wins | 6 months ago | no comparable pairs | 50% |
Matched by the nightly worker on class wins, buyer history, delivery geography, scale and notice text; relevance is a 0–100% heuristic score, not a probability of bidding. “Their award vs estimate” is that supplier’s median on its own comparable single-supplier wins, CPV 7931 first. Nobody here is known to be bidding.
Coverage and what to read with care
- Each tile explains itself. The on a figure says what it is, how it is counted and which scope this notice’s own record came from (class, division, all categories, or the authority’s 24-month row). The two columns are never blended and nothing is filled from a UK-wide figure; an empty tile means the source published nothing usable. Long form: Methodology.
- Coverage. Roughly 40 % of notices publish a bid count; about half publish an ITL1 delivery location, so the market column reads the authority’s registered region when the notice has none (labelled). About 30 % of award-vs-estimate pairs are exact matches — the buyer published the award at the estimate. n is on every figure; a thin sample is muted, never hidden.
- “Match” and “relevance” are model scores from the nightly matcher, not published facts. Find a Tender does not publish who is bidding. Never shown: contact details, payment behaviour, or a recommended price.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Open procedure
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Open for tender
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Yes (GPA)
- Recurring procurement
- No (one-off requirement)
- First published
- 22 Sept 2026, 11:56 BST
- Last source update
- 22 Sept 2026, 11:56 BST
- Award evaluation window
- Submission end — 30 Oct 2026, 23:59 GMT
- Latest notice
- Tender notice (UK4)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-07775aFind a Tender- Contract terms summary
- 30 days after approval of deliverables completion
- Risks
- Time constraints Legislatory / Regulatory compliance Failure to complete agreed deliverables to a sufficient standard and within agreed timescales Failure to adhere to agreed budget
How to participate & submission route
Official notice Submit via portal- Expression of interest (EOI)
- —
- Tender submission deadline
- 20 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
- Clarification deadline
- 16 Oct 2026, 00:00 BST
- Submission channel
- Official e-sourcing portal
- Electronic submission
- Allowed
- Accepted languages
- cy, en
Timeline
5 published dates · Europe/London- Tender notice published2 days ago22 Sept 2026, 11:56 BST
- Clarification questions byin 22 days16 Oct 2026, 00:00 BST
- Submission deadlinein 26 days20 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
- Award decision expected byin 37 days30 Oct 2026, 23:59 GMT
- Contract startsin 53 days16 Nov 2026, 00:00 GMT
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Nothing awarded yet- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Tender notice published22 Sept 2026, 11:56 BSTUK4
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (5)
Official links; attachments are not copiedTender pack and attachments
- Bidding documents and specifications Ending Abandonment After Stroke_ Challenge Brief _ English
- Bidding documents and specifications Ending Abandonment After Stroke_ Challenge Brief _ Welsh
- Technical specifications All technical requirements and relevant documentation can be accessed on the Simply Do Portal
- Conflict of interest declarationNot published
Notices published for this procedure
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender