TenderlineUK
Procurement Intelligence
Official OCDS
Find a Tender
complete
Official procurement procedure

Connect Radio and Transmission Services Contract: RON Variation

Maintenance services of telecommunications equipment
Radio network
Radio transmission apparatus with reception apparatus
+2 more
Published value
Not published
Submission deadline Not published
Lots published1
Procurement Executive Summary
AI & Search Synopsis
Generated from official OCDS record
Tenderline Synopsis: Transport for London: "Connect Radio and Transmission Services Contract: RON Variation". Published status: complete. Published value: Value not published. 1 published lot. Submission deadline not published. See the official notice for participation instructions.
Contracting AuthorityTransport for LondonScope & CategoriesNot publishedSubmission Window
complete
No deadline published
Submission GatewayDirect notice routeLegal Basis & RegimeStandard procurementEstimated Value (exc. VAT)Not published
Bidder Intelligence · Authority Profile: Transport for London
Market Analytics
View Authority Profile →
Derived from OCDS awards & bid statistics
Published history for Transport for London. These figures describe retained records, not a forecast of bids or a measure of buyer bias.
Published-to-award variance
Not availableInsufficient comparable data
Requires at least 5 comparable procedures
Competition Density
3.7Bids / Report
8.6% of reports have one bid
Supplier ConcentrationNo estimate
Insufficient attributable awardsNo concentration estimate available
Payment Terms
Check noticePublished terms
Payment obligations depend on the applicable regime and contract. Consult the official documents.
Coverage: 49 active published awards; 35 bid reports (which may be per lot). Supplier values exclude multi-supplier awards, frameworks and DPS, and use GBP only. They are published award values, not payments. Published-to-award variance compares single-lot, single-award, single-supplier GBP procedures with explicitly non-framework/non-DPS status; increases remain in the average. Unpublished data stays unknown. Awarded suppliers are winners, not all bidders.
Procedure terms
Contracting AuthorityTransport for London
Procedure methodNot published
Procurement categoryNot published
Statuscomplete
Framework / DPSNot published
CompetitionNot published
Above thresholdNot published
Legal basisNot published
Tender period startsNot published
Clarification deadlineNot published
Electronic submissionNot published
Submission languagesNot published
Published15 Sept 2023, 13:44 BST
Last source update15 Sept 2023, 13:44 BST
Recurring procurementNot published
ClassificationMaintenance services of telecommunications equipment, Radio network, Radio transmission apparatus with reception apparatus, Telecommunications network, Telecommunications services
Delivery area
OCIDocds-h6vhtk-03fd18
What is being bought
LUL and Citylink Telecommunications Limited (CTL) entered into a 20-year PFI contract on 19 November 1999 (Connect PFI Contract) for a digital radio and transmission system (Connect System). In 2018, LUL entered into a contract with Ground Transportation Systems UK Limited (GTS) (f.k.a. Thales Transport and Security Limited), a CTL shareholder, for continuation of the Connect Services after 2019 (GTS Contract). TfL now wishes to (a) engage GTS to renew the existing data transmission networks to deliver a single multi-service network (called MSN2) (Renewed Operating Network or RON) under the GTS Contract (Proposed RON Appointment) and (b) extend the term of the GTS Contract for 12 months beyond its current anticipated expiry on 21 November 2026 (with an option for further extensions of up to 2 years) (Proposed RON Extension)(collectively, the Proposed RON Variation). As explained at II.2.4 and IV.1.1, LUL considers that the Proposed RON Variation is permitted under Reg. 88 of the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2016 (UCR). TfL intends, and is already in the process of preparing, to re-procure the management of the Connect System competitively upon the expiry of the GTS Contract as varied by the Proposed RON Variation. TfL considers that implementation of the Proposed RON Variation, as described below, will enable it to hold a more attractive and more effective competition for the management of the Connect System after expiry of the GTS Contract.
What changed
From the official release history
  1. Status changed to complete
    15 Sept 2023, 13:44 BST
  2. Official notice release published
    15 Sept 2023, 13:44 BST
  3. Buyer information updated
    15 Sept 2023, 13:44 BST
Lots and requirements (1)
Published by the contracting authority
  • Lot 1 · #1
    Individual lot title not published
    Status not published
    Published valueNot published
    The Connect System uses digital terrestrial trunked radio (TETRA) technology which, alongside other features, is highly reliable and ensures security and confidentiality of operational communications. The Connect System is critical to the operation of the LU railway, as it provides: (a) mission-critical voice radio between LUL control centres and train drivers; (b) mission-critical voice and safety alarms for train drivers and other railway staff; (c) fixed cable voice and data connections between stations; and (d) other signalling links and other links for a range of operational railway applications. GTS is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the Connect System. The TETRA radio system used for the Connect System was supplied by Motorola, using its Dimetra product, and is supported and maintained by Motorola as a contractor to GTS. The Connect System also comprises other elements of hardware and software, including both commercial off-the-shelf products and bespoke equipment or software designed specifically for the Connect System. The data transmission networks used in the Connect System include: a multi-services network (MSN) carrying IP-based applications, including radio data traffic, a data network based on asynchronous transfer mode transmission (ATM) carrying the CCTV data, and a data network based on synchronous digital hierarchy transmission (SDH) carrying various types of data such as telephone voice and text, radio data traffic and customer service information. These three data transmission networks are based on legacy technology. They have already, or are about to, become obsolete, meaning that it will no longer be possible to secure spares and the associated equipment and software ceases to be patchable or upgradeable. This obsolescence introduces risks which LUL has concluded must be mitigated given the operationally critical nature of the Connect System. TfL needs to address the obsolescence of the legacy data transmission networks, following its decision to continue to use the TETRA radio system until the mid-2030s, because the TETRA radio system requires a modern data transmission network with adequate bandwidth. That recent decision was based on TfL's own analysis and that of external consultants, which concluded that the alternatives to TETRA radio will not become available until the late 2020s and that, even after alternatives become available, TfL would need a number of years to migrate to the alternatives and mitigate the associated transitional risk. The GTS Contract contemplates some upgrades of the legacy data transmission networks as part of the pre-agreed upgrade works, as further detailed at paragraph Section VI below: however, such currently contemplated upgrade work is insufficient to mitigate these obsolescence risks. Therefore, to address the obsolescence of the legacy data transmission networks, TfL now wishes to carry out a renewal of the existing data transfer networks to deliver a consolidated multi-services network for the transmission of data between London underground sites (including stations, depots and control centres) (the MSN2 network). The renewed data transfer network will be constituted by a combination of existing, upgraded and refreshed network assets. This will require GTS to work with TfL, and with GTS' sub-contractors, to design, develop, build, migrate, commission and manage the Renewed Operating Network (RON) works to deliver the MSN2 network. By carrying out the RON works, TfL will be delivering on its established strategy of, wherever possible, adopting a multi-service approach, minimising the number of data networks it uses and ensuring that these data networks are designed and built so as to support multiple different use cases and have a much wider utility to TfL, both now and in future. The RON works are required to achieve this objective. Another important reason to carry out the RON works at this time is to ensure that upon expiry of the GTS Contract, LUL will have a more modern, functioning data network asset that is in-support. This will help TfL to re-procure the services to manage the associated assets after the expiry of the GTS Contract. TfL now wishes to (a) engage GTS to design, develop, build, migrate, commission and manage the RON work under the umbrella of the GTS Contract (Proposed RON Appointment) and (b) extend the term of the GTS Contract for 12 months beyond its current anticipated expiry on 21 November 2026 (with an option for further extensions of up to 2 years) to allow sufficient time for the delivery of the RON works (Proposed RON Extension) without first holding a new competitive bidding process. TfL wishes to implement the Proposed RON Appointment and the Proposed RON Extension as a single variation under the GTS Contract (collectively, the Proposed RON Variation). GTS has carried out a competitive procurement for all additional third-party equipment and support services required to deliver the RON works. GTS has reported to TfL on a transparent basis in relation to that procurement and GTS's proposed award of the contracts for the purchase of that equipment and support. Finally, TfL intends, and is already in the process of preparing, to re-procure the management of the Connect System competitively upon the expiry of the GTS Contract as varied by the Proposed RON Variation. TfL considers that implementation of the Proposed RON Variation, as described above, will enable it to hold a more attractive and more effective competition for the management of the Connect System after expiry of the GTS Contract.
    Contract periodNot published
    EligibilityNot published
    Options / renewalNot published
Timeline
  1. Procedure published
    15 Sept 2023, 13:44 BST
  2. Award active
    Not published · Not published
  3. Contract active
    Signed 4 Sept 2023, 00:00 BST · £192,000,000
Commercial outcome and competition
Awards
GROUND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS UK LIMITED
Not published · Not published · active
Contracts
Contract
£192,000,000 · signed 4 Sept 2023, 00:00 BST · active
Bid statisticsNo aggregate bid statistics published
Buyer and organisations in this procedure

Transport for London

Contracting authority GB-FTS-14777
View buyer profile
  • Transport for London
    buyer

    5 ENDEAVOUR SQUARE, LONDON, UKI, E201JN
    +44 7725610030
  • GROUND TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS UK LIMITED
    supplier

    GB-COH: Company number 03132438
    350 Longwater Avenue, Green Park, Reading, UK, RG2 6GF
  • High Court (England, Wales and Northern Ireland)
    reviewBody

    London
Documents (0)
Official links; attachments are not copied
No data
No linked documents are published
Related procedures (0)
No data
No related procedures published
Planning and rationale
Planning budgetNot published
No-engagement rationaleNot published
Procedure rationaleTfL considers that the Proposed RON Variation would not be a substantial modification of the GTS Contract, as Schedule 2.7 of the GTS Contract already provides for several upgrade projects to be undertaken by GTS on the legacy MSN system, some of which overlap with the RON work. Even if the Proposed RON Variation were a substantial modification, TfL considers that the exemption in Regulation 88(1)(b) UCR would apply, for the following reasons. The RON works have become necessary The RON works have become necessary because of the obsolescence issues with the existing three data networks (MSN, ATM and SDH) used by Connect. As explained in section II.2.4 above, these three legacy networks have already, or are about to, become obsolete, meaning that it will no longer be possible to secure spares and the associated equipment, and that software ceases to be patchable or upgradeable. This obsolescence introduces risks which LUL has concluded must be mitigated by the RON works, given the operationally critical nature of the Connect System. The RON works are also necessary to implement TfL's strategy of minimising the number of data networks deployed (thereby simplifying the support model) and, wherever possible, implementing data networks which can securely support multiple different uses, such as CCTV, signalling, Wi-Fi, etc. RON will achieve this by replacing the 3 legacy data networks under the Connect System (MSN, ATM and SDH) with one new data network which has much wider utility to TfL. The additional 12 months of the Proposed RON Extension have become necessary to allow for the completion of the RON works, plus a reasonable period of transition thereafter. A change of contractor cannot be made for technical reasons There are technical reasons why a change of contractor cannot be made: these are set out at VI.3 below. These factors demonstrate that engaging a new third party contractor to carry out the RON work would cause significant inconvenience and risk to TfL. A complex and costly interface would have to be put in place between the third party and GTS, which would be difficult for TfL to manage and would introduce new operational and network performance risks to the operation of the Connect System. Furthermore, any third party engaged to deliver the RON works would be interfering with a live network, creating additional operational risks. A change of contractor cannot be made for economic reasons There are also economic reasons why the RON works must be completed by GTS. Retaining GTS avoids the cost and complexity of managing the interface between GTS, in its role as operator, and any new contractor engaged to do the RON works. GTS' existing supply chains will allow it to upgrade the Connect infrastructure more cost-effectively than a third party. In relation to the additional operational and network performance risks resulting from the introduction of a new contractor for the RON works, which would need to be managed by GTS and the new contractor, GTS and the new contractor would be likely to charge TfL more for agreeing to take on such risks. Also, utilising GTS' existing facilities and management resources will minimise costs and overheads. A change of contractor would cause significant inconvenience and duplication of costs for TfL Contracting RON via a third party would also likely introduce significant programme risk, due to the inclusion of the associated procurement period, and the complexities of acceptance and handover into maintenance, prior to establishing a migration programme. Any delays to rolling out RON would be detrimental to TfL because it would need to continue to rely on obsolete network equipment which becomes increasingly hard to maintain, resulting in operational risk and significant additional costs. Such delays would also be likely to delay TfL's re-procurement of services for the management of the Connect System.