Find a TenderOpen for tender Tender notice
Published 9 Oct 2026, 15:08 BST

Official UK procurement notice

BCU-ITT-64220 - Substation 4 Switchgear Upgrade -WMH

Procurement agent: Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board·On behalf of: NHS Wales Shared Services Partnership-Procurement Services (hosted by Velindre University NHS Trust)

WorksBelow threshold - open competitionBelow thresholdSME suitableVCSE suitable
Published estimate£950,000≈ £950k / year · £1,140,000 inc. VAT
Submission deadline 20 Nov 202612:00 GMT · 41d 10h left
Clarification cut-off 13 Nov 202612:00 GMT · questions to the authority
Contract term 1 yrends 21 Jan 2028 · starts 22 Jan 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board requires a suitably qualified and experienced electrical engineering contractor to undertake the phased replacement and upgrade of the Low Voltage (LV) switchgear infrastructure within Substation 4 at Wrexham Maelor Hospital. The project forms part of the Nucleus Phase 1 programme and is intended to improve the resilience, reliability and operational flexibility of the hospital’s electrical distribution network.

Please note that a JCT Intermediate Building Contract will be utilised for this tender.

Attendance at a site visit is a mandatory requirement. Failure to attend the site visit may result in disqualification from the tender process.

To arrange a site visit, please contact:

• Ben Humphreys - [email protected] - Tel - 03000848537

• Paul Jones - [email protected] - Tel – 03000848525

CPV: Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services · Construction work

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · value published
Lot #1 1 yrSMEVCSEPublished value£950,000
Contract period: 22 Jan 2027 — 21 Jan 2028 (1 yr)Eligibility: SME eligibleVCSE eligibleDelivery: WalesTurnover guideline: ~£1,900,000/yr≈ 2× annual value
Value
£950,000 exc. VAT · £1,140,000 inc. VAT
45000000 Construction work71000000 Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services
Pre-qualification & selection criteria (PQQ)1
  • Condition of participation
    Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board requires a suitably qualified and experienced electrical engineering contractor to undertake the phased replacement and upgrade of the Low Voltage (LV) switchgear infrastructure within Substation 4 at Wrexham Maelor Hospital. The project forms part of the Nucleus Phase 1 programme and is intended to improve the resilience, reliability and operational flexibility of the hospital’s electrical distribution network. Please note that a JCT Intermediate Building Contract will be utilised for this tender. The full details are outlined with the tender documents attached within Bravo. The tender will be awarded to the most advantageous tender based on 40% quality and 60% cost as detailed in the ITT document. Please note that the tender closing date is 20/11/2026 at midday and any late submissions will not be considered. The etenderwales bravosolution ref: https://etenderwales.bravosolution.co.uk Project: project_64220 and itt_127842 Please direct all queries relating to this tender via the messaging function of the Bravo portal.

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

What it takes to win
i

How this buyer will score bids.

The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).

Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published — the tender pack may add more
How bids are scored
Quality: 40%Price: 60%
Published sub-criteria (2)
  • Technical Envelope — 40%
  • Commercial Envelope — 60%
Published award criteria (2)
  • Technical Envelope — Assessment of the bidder’s technical capability, proposed methodology, resource capacity, relevant experience, approach to compliance and governance requirements, risk management arrangements, and ability to deliver the services in accordance with the tender requirements.
  • Commercial Envelope — Evaluation of the bidder’s commercial submission, including overall contract cost, pricing structure, value for money, and any associated pricing information submitted in accordance with the tender requirements and pricing schedule.
Conditions of participation1
  • Condition of participation
    Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board requires a suitably qualified and experienced electrical engineering contractor to undertake the phased replacement and upgrade of the Low Voltage (LV) switchgear infrastructure within Substation 4 at Wrexham Maelor Hospital. The project forms part of the Nucleus Phase 1 programme and is intended to improve the resilience, reliability and operational flexibility of the hospital’s electrical distribution network. Please note that a JCT Intermediate Building Contract will be utilised for this tender. The full details are outlined with the tender documents attached within Bravo. The tender will be awarded to the most advantageous tender based on 40% quality and 60% cost as detailed in the ITT document. Please note that the tender closing date is 20/11/2026 at midday and any late submissions will not be considered. The etenderwales bravosolution ref: https://etenderwales.bravosolution.co.uk Project: project_64220 and itt_127842 Please direct all queries relating to this tender via the messaging function of the Bravo portal.
What this means for your bid
  • Price carries 60 of 100 points — a 10% discount moves about 6 points. This one is won on the number — sharpen the price before polishing the prose.
  • Turnover usually expected at this size: about £1,900,000 (twice the annual value).

Price arithmetic assumes straight proportional scoring — the tender pack may use another formula. Turnover is an indicative market norm (≈2× annual value), not a published condition.

Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid

How Velindre University NHS Trust buys Construction work (CPV 45) — and who usually turns up

Velindre University NHS Trust’s own published record, next to the Wales (Cymru) market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Construction work (CPV 45) →

1

How the contest usually goes

This buyer’s published record next to the market where the work is delivered — contested contracts only, counted per lot

Question for the bid
This buyerVelindre University NHS Trust · all categories
The marketConstruction work (CPV 45) · Wales (Cymru)
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 22 of 55 known-size awards · market: division 45, n=267
40%82%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Here, local means registered in Wales (Cymru).

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 44 of 99 known-location awards · market: division 45, n=331
44%70%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered outside Wales (Cymru).

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 39 decided notices · market: n=146
62 days44 days

Half of these awards were announced within 62 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 81 of 118 awarded contracts without a rival · market: n=334
69%12%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer42 lots with bid counts · all categories
21% had one bid
The market288 lots with bid counts · broad CPV 45
16% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid21% / 16%
Buyer: 9 of 42 lots with published bid counts. Market: 47 of 288 lots with published bid counts.
2–333% / 38%
Buyer: 14 of 42 lots with published bid counts. Market: 108 of 288 lots with published bid counts.
4–626% / 31%
Buyer: 11 of 42 lots with published bid counts. Market: 89 of 288 lots with published bid counts.
7+19% / 15%
Buyer: 8 of 42 lots with published bid counts. Market: 44 of 288 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer22 lots with estimate and award · all categories
55% below estimate
The market227 lots with estimate and award · broad CPV 45
53% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate55% / 53%
Buyer: 12 of 22 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 121 of 227 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%27% / 22%
Buyer: 6 of 22 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 51 of 227 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate18% / 24%
Buyer: 4 of 22 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 55 of 227 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors — from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #116% single-bidPublished estimate£950,000
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 288 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—16% single-bid risk
Past bids on 288 similar lots
1 bid16%
47 of 288 similar past lots received 1 bid (16%).
2–338%
108 of 288 similar past lots received 2–3 (38%).
4–631%
89 of 288 similar past lots received 4–6 (31%).
7+15%
44 of 288 similar past lots received 7+ (15%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 3 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the winning price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A guide, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet — the published estimate is £950k, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

SupplierThis buyer’s earlier contractLotAward valueMatch
—

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

SupplierWon in this categoryLive contractsAward vs estimate
—
Coverage and what to read with care
  • Each figure explains itself. The on a figure says what it is, how it is counted and which scope this notice’s own record came from (class, division, all categories, or the authority’s 24-month row). The two sides are never blended. A lot’s own market is read at its delivery region where the lot names one; where it names several, or none that can be resolved, the chart falls back to the UK-wide record for the same category and says so under the bar. An empty cell means the source published nothing usable. Long form: Methodology.
  • When we call out a difference. A buyer figure is only flagged against the market when the sample is large enough that the gap is unlikely to be chance; at most two callouts appear, always phrased as a comparison with both numbers and the sample size.
  • Coverage (re-measured 5 Oct on the live record, 94,497 awarded procedures of the last three years). 51 % publish a bid count and 72 % a delivery region, so the market column reads the authority’s registered region when the notice names none, labelled. Of the 17,687 award-vs-estimate pairs, 34 % sit exactly on the estimate — the buyer published the award at the figure it advertised. n is on every figure; a thin sample is muted, never hidden, and a distribution is not drawn as percentages below ten observations.
  • “Match”, text similarity, the expected-bid figure and the distribution drawn beneath it are model outputs, not published facts or win probabilities. Find a Tender does not publish who is bidding. Never shown: contact details, payment behaviour, or a recommended price.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Procedure method
Below threshold - open competition
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Works
Notice status
Open for tender
Procurement threshold
Below threshold
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
9 Oct 2026, 15:08 BST
Last source update
9 Oct 2026, 15:08 BST
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-095754
Latest notice
Tender notice (UK4)
Classification (CPV)
Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection servicesConstruction work
Delivery area
Wales (UKL23)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0784f1 Find a Tender

How to participate & submission route

Official notice Submit via Jaggaer
Submission portal named on this notice: Jaggaer · Who buys & how to bid on Sell2Wales
Supplier login requiredElectronic submission allowed
Access & registration note: Free; latest Chrome/Edge/Firefox only — corporate browsers fail
Requests to participate (first stage)
—
Tender submission deadline
20 Nov 2026, 12:00 GMT
Clarification deadline
13 Nov 2026, 12:00 GMT
Submission channel
Official e-sourcing portal
Electronic submission
Allowed
Detailed submission instructions & authority contactsFrom official release
Published estimate £950,000 excludes VAT (£1,140,000 including VAT).

Timeline

4 published dates · Europe/London
  1. Tender notice publishedearlier today
    9 Oct 2026, 15:08 BST
  2. Clarification questions byin 34 days
    13 Nov 2026, 12:00 GMT
  3. Submission deadlinein 41 days
    20 Nov 2026, 12:00 GMT
  4. Contract startsin 104 days
    22 Jan 2027

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Nothing awarded yet
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Notice history

2 events · 1 release on Find a Tender · since 9 Oct 2026
  1. Tender notice published
    9 Oct 2026, 15:08 BSTUK4
  2. First tender notice published
    9 Oct 2026, 15:08 BST

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

3 public bodies on the notice

Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board

Procurement agentPublic authority - sub-central governmentWelsh devolved regulations apply GB-PPON: PHBY-3981-QBMR Headquarters Ysbyty Gwynedd, Penrhosgarnedd,, Bangor, Wales, LL57 2PW Liliana Holmes [email protected] +442921501733

Clients of the procurement agent

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure

  • Tender notice tenderTender noticeUK4Tender notice on Find a Tender