Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 16 Oct 2026, 15:47 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Bannister Athletic Track Refurbishment

Authority: London Borough of Harrow (Local council)

WorksBelow thresholdSME suitable
Planned pipeline valueValue not publishedpipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 8 Feb 2027from the planned procurement notice
Contract term 3 moends 1 Oct 2027 · starts 29 Jun 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

LONDON TENDERS PORTAL REFERENCE DN 833364

The Bannister Athletics Track is a facility of national significance and is used by elite athletes www.harrowac.co.uk ↗. The Council is committed to its continued operation and accordingly has a made funding application to the LMF London Marathon Funding. The Council acknowledges that the award of the contract is dependent on this funding. However, it is necessary to begin procurement activities now in order that the successful supplier can undertake works in the 12-week window in the summer of 2027. The Council undertakes to keep suppliers informed. of its progress in obtaining funding and not to waste the time of suppliers should the funding package not be available. project seeks to secure the long-term future of the facility through replacement of the existing synthetic athletics track surface, associated base repairs and recertification to UK Athletics TrackMark standards.

Accordingly, the Council would like to speak to suppliers with the necessary knowledge, skills and experience of such work about the shape of the imminent procurement through this advertised soft market testing process.

The process will be undertaken strictly as per the Procurement Act 2023 and suppliers who do or not take part in the soft market testing exercise will not be advantaged or disadvantaged and will particularly not confer any advantage to any one supplier.

All respondents to the Preliminary Market Engagement Notice will receive an anonymised summary of the discussions. No bidder confidential information will be shared.

Affordability i.e. the likely cost of the works

What contract form should be used e.g. JCT?

Whether suppliers would need to sub- contract any elements

The form of the specification

Risk partition i.e. what uncertainties would affect the ability to the deliver the project for a fixed cost.

Design considerations- i.e. what elements would be needed to be designed by the Council and what aspects would be designed by the supplier.

Realistic delivery timeline i.e. when suppliers would be available to deliver the work and what their pipelines looked like.

Proposed procurement route- the Council is proposing to use an Open Procedure albeit with supplier self -declarations of probity.

CPV: Flatwork for running tracks

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1Planned 3 moSME
Contract period: 29 Jun 2027 – 1 Oct 2027 (3 mo)
Delivery: LondonEligibility: SME eligible

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How London Borough of Harrow buys Construction work for pipelines, communication and power lines, for highways, roads, airfields and railways; flatwork (CPV 4523), and who usually turns up

London Borough of Harrow’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Construction work for pipelines, communication and power lines, for highways, roads, airfields and railways; flatwork (CPV 4523) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 12 of 17 known-size awards · market: CPV 4523 · Greater London, n=62
71%48%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Here, local means registered in Greater London.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 10 of 27 known-location awards · market: CPV 4523 · Greater London, n=91
37%34%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered outside Greater London.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 5 decided notices · market: CPV 4523 · Greater London, n=13
46 days58 days

Half of these awards were announced within 46 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 18 of 27 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 4523 · Greater London, n=90
67%47%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer13 lots with bid counts · all categories
31% had one bid
The market20 lots with bid counts · CPV 4523 · Greater London
15% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid31% / 15%
Buyer: 4 of 13 lots with published bid counts. Market: 3 of 20 lots with published bid counts.
2–346% / 20%
Buyer: 6 of 13 lots with published bid counts. Market: 4 of 20 lots with published bid counts.
4–68% / 30%
Buyer: 1 of 13 lots with published bid counts. Market: 6 of 20 lots with published bid counts.
7+15% / 35%
Buyer: 2 of 13 lots with published bid counts. Market: 7 of 20 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer11 lots with estimate and award · all categories
18% below estimate
The market20 lots with estimate and award · CPV 4523 · Greater London
50% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate18% / 50%
Buyer: 2 of 11 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 10 of 20 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%64% / 20%
Buyer: 7 of 11 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 4 of 20 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate18% / 30%
Buyer: 2 of 11 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 6 of 20 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 45233 monthsSME suitableEstimate not published
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 20 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet15% single-bid risk
Past bids on 20 similar lots
1 bid15%
3 of 20 similar past lots received 1 bid (15%).
2–320%
4 of 20 similar past lots received 2–3 (20%).
4–630%
6 of 20 similar past lots received 4–6 (30%).
7+35%
7 of 20 similar past lots received 7+ (35%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Estimate not published
The buyer published no estimate for this lot, so there is nothing to forecast against. A price prediction here would be a number about a number we do not have.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Works
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Below threshold
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
16 Oct 2026, 15:47 BST
Last source update
19 Oct 2026, 11:18 BST
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-098374
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Flatwork for running tracks
Delivery area
London (UKI7)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0789ee Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

16 Oct 2026 → 29 Jun 2027 · 5 dates
  1. Planning notice published5 days ago
    16 Oct 2026, 15:47 BST
  2. Latest notice published2 days ago
    19 Oct 2026, 11:18 BST
  3. Today
    21 Oct 2026
  4. Market engagementin 52 days
    11 Dec 2026, 23:59 GMT

    The project seeks to secure the long-term future of the facility through replacement of the existing synthetic athletics track surface, associated base repairs and recertification to UK Athletics TrackMark standards.

    Accordingly, the Council would like to speak to suppliers with the necessary knowledge, skills and experience of such work about the shape of the imminent procurement through this advertised soft market testing process.

    The process will be undertaken strictly as per the Procurement Act 2023 and suppliers who do or not take part in the soft market testing exercise will not be advantaged or disadvantaged and will particularly not confer any advantage to any one supplier.

    All respondents to the Preliminary Market Engagement Notice will receive an anonymised summary of the discussions. No bidder confidential information will be shared.

    Affordability i.e. the likely cost of the works

    What contract form should be used e.g. JCT?

    Whether suppliers would need to sub- contract any elements

    The form of the specification

    Risk partition i.e. what uncertainties would affect the ability to the deliver the project for a fixed cost.

    Design considerations- i.e. what elements would be needed to be designed by the Council and what aspects would be designed by the supplier.

    Realistic delivery timeline i.e. when suppliers would be available to deliver the work and what their pipelines looked like.

    Proposed procurement route- the Council is proposing to use an Open Procedure albeit with supplier self -declarations of probity.

    Applying

    If you would like to see us to discuss this opportunity, please write in no more than 1000 words describing your interest in the procurement, your past experience in the field and the points you would like to discuss.

    Soft market testing is planned to take place between the 7th and 11th December 2026 at the Bannister Outdoor Sports Centre Uxbridge Road, Harrow HA3 6S. Each party will have 3 hours with a common agenda. Please keep these days free as alternative days cannot be offered.

    If you are not seen please rest assured this will not disadvantage you in the forthcoming formal procurement. All parties which express an interest will receive feedback from the soft market testing event before the Find a Tender Service notice is published (marking the start of the formal procurement procedure)

    Please make your submission via the London Tenders Portal by Thursday 26th November 2026 at Noon.

    Project Management

    The procurement is being run on a project managed basis, and the Council has put in place resources remains deliverable. Robust governance is in place to ensure that communication channels between the Council and bidders remain robust.

    Feedback to potential participants

    Feedback will be given to those participating in the forthcoming soft market testing exercise. This will be on an anonymised basis, and we will ensure that information of a commercially confidential nature will not be included in feedback.

    Once the formal procurement process begins, GBC will keep participants informed at appropriate stages of the procurement.

    Freedom of Information

    The Council is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Environmental Information Regulations 1992 and may be obliged, when requested, to disclose information you provide to them even though it may be regarded as confidential. However, the exemption from disclosure applying to information which, if disclosed, would or would be likely to prejudice the commercial interests of any person including the Council (including such information relating to a procurement exercise) will apply, provided that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information.

    Queries

    All questions on this prospectus should be via the London Tenders Portal. Generally, we will respect the confidentiality of questions flagged as such by suppliers. Where we receive queries in relation to this prospectus and we believe the response will be of general interest without violating any confidentiality we will circulate the query and response to all the parties that have expressed an interest.

    Canvassing

    Participants should note that canvassing or lobbying (defined as communications with the Council or individual stakeholders) outside the channels identified in the Prior Information Notice) might affect their ability to engage with the procurement process. Attention is also drawn to the provisions of the Bribery Act 2010.

    Appendix 1 Draft Specification

    Main Works

    • Removal and recycling of the existing synthetic track surface.
    • Localised macadam repairs.
    • Potential repair of approximately 800m² of existing macadam.
    • Replacement of approximately 100 linear metres of kerbing where settlement has occurred.
    • Cleaning and refurbishment of drainage channels.
    • Installation of a new World Athletics certified porous polymeric athletics track system.
    • Line marking.
    • Completion testing and certification.
    • Reinstatement and handover documentation.

    Delivery Timescales

    The Council is targeting delivery during a suitable weather window to allow installation of the new porous surface. The consultancy report advises that porous surface installations are typically undertaken between April and September, subject to weather conditions, and would require approximately 10-12 weeks on site. During this period the athletics track would be unavailable for use.

  5. Tender notice expectedin 111 days
    8 Feb 2027, 23:59 GMT
  6. Contract startsin 251 days
    29 Jun 2027, 00:00 BST

Notice history

2 events · 2 releases on Find a Tender · since 16 Oct 2026
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    16 Oct 2026, 15:47 BST
    UK2
  2. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    19 Oct 2026, 11:18 BST
    UK2
Published amendments (1)

London Tenders Portal Reference DN833364 added

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

London Borough of Harrow

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PQRC-2343-GRQR Forward Drive, Harrow, London, HA3 8FLContact name, email, phone

Official documents & specifications (2)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure