Find a TenderAwarded without competition
Published 22 Oct 2024, 09:57 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Award of Contract to manage Ash Dieback

Official notice

Authority: Leeds City Council - PACS (Local council)

ServicesAward procedure without prior publication of a call for competition
Awarded value£440,000published contract · exc. VAT
Awarded 10 Feb 2025no call for competition
Awarded to Tilhill Forestry Ltd2 awards

What is being bought

Published requirement description

This contract is to carry out ground truthing surveys on 529 Ash Trees, carry out safe removal of the trees with relevant traffic management processes put in place. Once trees removed and disposed off, carry out the replanting of 5 trees per one cut down.

Phase 1 will focus on the removal of 539 Council owned trees that are most seriously affected by the disease (Class 4 trees) and that are within falling distance of Leeds' A and B Roads. Sampling survey undertaken in June 2024 (see paragraph 10 above) allowed the LCC team to estimate that 90% of the ash trees wehad a diameter at breast height (dbh - measured at 1.3 m above

ground) of less than 45 cms and the remaining 10% had a dbh of greater than 45 cms. This allowed the team to estimate removal costs based on Tilhill's schedule of rates.

CPV: Tree-clearing services · Tree-cutting services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1A potential total of 539 trees will be removed under this phase of works, with…Awarded

A potential total of 539 trees will be removed under this phase of works, with replanting of 5 trees for every one removed. This will also include the ground truthing of a further 14,000 plus trees across the A and B Road network.

Delivery: Yorkshire & Humber · Citywide across Leeds

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record · publisher note attached
Procedure method
Award procedure without prior publication of a call for competition
Legal basis
CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Awarded without competition
Procurement threshold
Unspecified in notice
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Direct award (no call for competition)
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
22 Oct 2024, 09:57 BST
Last source update
10 Feb 2025, 09:26 GMT
FTS notice number
2025/S 000-004285
Classification (CPV)
Tree-clearing servicesTree-cutting services
Delivery area
Yorkshire & Humber (UKE42)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-04aff2 Find a Tender
Why no open competition
The procurement falls outside the scope of application of the directive
Published justification

The Council believes that the decision to award new contracts for the Phase 1 'Pilot Project' of the City's Ash Dieback Programme is permitted pursuant Regulation 32(2)(c) of the PCR which

states:

"32(1) In the specific cases and circumstances laid down in this regulation, contracting authorities

may award public contracts by a negotiated procedure without prior publication.

(2) The negotiated procedure without prior publication may be used for public works contracts,

public supply contracts and public service contracts in any of the following cases:

(c) in so far as is strictly necessary where, for reasons of extreme urgency brought about by

events unforeseeable by the contracting authority, the time limits for the open or restricted

procedures or competitive procedures with negotiation cannot be complied with."

The late start to beginning the procurement process was dependent on having the funds in place

and the evidence to support release of funds needed to be accurate. The time taken to provide this evidence was unforeseeable and the requirement to mitigate the risks to people and property within a short time frame is extremely urgent. The increase in the number and severity of autumn/winter 'Named Storms' adds to this urgency.

It is further important to note that the extreme urgency brought on to make this direct award to Tilhill pursuant to Regulation 32(2)(c) PCR 2015 is also compounded by the increasing public health and safety issue due to the proximity of the trees requiring felling and management to the roadways. If this direct award is not made there is a danger that the trees will fall onto the roadways.

Notwithstanding the above, there is the potential risk of challenge because the Council has used Regulation 32(2)(c) PCR 2015. This risk can be mitigated by the publication of a voluntary transparency notice on Find a Tender Service immediately after the decision to award the contract has been taken and then waiting 10 days to see if any challenges are made. If no challenges are made, the chances of a claim for ineffectiveness being brought are significantly reduced and would only be successful if the Council had used the negotiated procedure without publication of a notice incorrectly.

Furthermore, publishing such a notice will also start time running for any other potential claim for breach of the PCR, which must be brought within 30 days of the date that an aggrieved party knew or ought to have known that a breach had occurred.

Review and risk notes
Review procedure

This decision can be challenged within 10 days of this notice being published and up to 30 days of the date that any aggrieved party knew or ought to have know about the decision.

Publisher note: The Council believes that the decision to award new contracts for the Phase 1 'Pilot Project' of the City's Ash Dieback Programme is permitted pursuant Regulation 32(2)(c) of the PCR which states: "32(1) In the specific cases and circumstances laid down in this regulation, contracting authorities may award public contracts by a negotiated procedure without prior publication. (2) The negotiated procedure without prior publication may be used for public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts in any of the following cases: (c) in so far as is strictly necessary where, for reasons of extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable by the contracting authority, the time limits for the open or restricted procedures or competitive procedures with negotiation cannot be complied with." The late start to beginning the procurement process was dependent on having the funds in place and the evidence to support release of funds needed to be accurate. The time taken to provide this evidence was unforeseeable and the requirement to mitigate the risks to people and property within a short time frame is extremely urgent. The increase in the number and severity of autumn/winter 'Named Storms' adds to this urgency. It is further important to note that the extreme urgency brought on to make this direct award to Tilhill pursuant to Regulation 32(2)(c) PCR 2015 is also compounded by the increasing public health and safety issue due to the proximity of the trees requiring felling and management to the roadways. If this direct award is not made there is a danger that the trees will fall onto the roadways. Notwithstanding the above, there is the potential risk of challenge because the Council has used Regulation 32(2)(c) PCR 2015. This risk can be mitigated by the publication of a voluntary transparency notice on Find a Tender Service immediately after the decision to award the contract has been taken and then waiting 10 days to see if any challenges are made. If no challenges are made, the chances of a claim for ineffectiveness being brought are significantly reduced and would only be successful if the Council had used the negotiated procedure without publication of a notice incorrectly. Furthermore, publishing such a notice will also start time running for any other potential claim for breach of the PCR, which must be brought within 30 days of the date that an aggrieved party knew or ought to have known that a breach had occurred.

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Published awards, contracts and bid statistics, not a forecast
Awards 2
Awarded value £440,0001 contract exc. VAT · 1 repeated publication of the same award counted once
Bids received 1
Contracts signed 2latest 10 Feb 2025
Awarded toValueDateStatus
Tilhill Forestry Ltd£440,000 †—Awarded
Tilhill Forestry LtdContract to manage Ash Dieback——Awarded

Contracts

Bid statistics published by the authority

BidsSMEVCSEValid bid range
1bids · 1 electronic0—£400,000 – £440,000

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Leeds City Council - PACS

Contracting authorityLocal CouncilRegional or local authorityGeneral public services Civic Hall, Leeds, Yorkshire & Humber, LS11URContact name, email, phone

Dispute resolution & review bodies

  • The High Court of JusticeReview body London

Bidders & participating suppliers

2 commercial parties on the notice
  • TILHILL FORESTRY LIMITEDAwarded supplierGB-COH: 03242286 3rd Floor 1 Ashley Road, Altrincham, Cheshire, United Kingdom, WA14 2DT, Altrincham, North West, WA14 2DT
  • Tilhill Forestry LimitedAwarded supplierGB-COH: 3242286 3rd Floor 1 Ashley Road, Altrincham, UK, WA14 2DT

Official documents & specifications

Official links; attachments are not copied

No document links were published on the notice.