Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 19 Feb 2026, 16:07 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

AI Theatre Planning · UK public procurement notice

Authority: University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (Central government)

ServicesAbove thresholdSME suitable
Sectors: IT Services & Software (72) Delivery: Delivery location not published
Planned pipeline value£1pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 30 Mar 2026from the planned procurement notice
Contract term 1 yrends 30 Mar 2027 · starts 31 Mar 2026

What is being bought

Published requirement description

UHL & UHN Group requires the Provision of the AI Services relate to the provision of a Theatre Productivity application built on the FDP canonical data model and deployed entirely within the Trusts’ FDP tenant. The Group is seeking to appoint a Service Provider to deliver an AI services pilot that includes the design, deployment, and early-use evaluation of a real time, predictive theatre productivity platform.

CPV: IT software development services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1Planned 1 yrSME
Contract period: 31 Mar 2026 – 30 Mar 2027 (1 yr)
Eligibility: SME eligible

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust buys Programming services of packaged software products (CPV 7221), and who usually turns up

University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Programming services of packaged software products (CPV 7221) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bidWhat to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 13 of 65 known-size awards · market: CPV 7221 · East Midlands (authority’s region), n=36
20%36%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Here, local means registered in East Midlands (authority’s region).

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 9 of 36 known-location awards · market: CPV 7221 · East Midlands (authority’s region), n=44
25%14%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered outside East Midlands.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: CPV 7221 · UK-wide, n=60
—48 days

Half of these awards were announced within 48 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 95 of 107 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 7221 · East Midlands (authority’s region), n=61
89%61%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyerNo bid counts published
The market80 lots with bid counts · CPV 7221 · UK-wide
4% had one bid
Market · select a colour for counts
1 bid4%
Market: 3 of 80 lots with published bid counts.
2–334%
Market: 27 of 80 lots with published bid counts.
4–633%
Market: 26 of 80 lots with published bid counts.
7+30%
Market: 24 of 80 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyerNo estimate-and-award pairs published
The market57 lots with estimate and award · CPV 7221 · UK-wide
47% below estimate
Market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate47%
Market: 27 of 57 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%33%
Market: 19 of 57 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate19%
Market: 11 of 57 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 722112 monthsSME suitableNo real estimate
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 55 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet9% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 55 similar lots
1 bid9%
5 of 55 similar past lots received 1 bid (9%).
2–327%
15 of 55 similar past lots received 2–3 (27%).
4–625%
14 of 55 similar past lots received 4–6 (25%).
7+38%
21 of 55 similar past lots received 7+ (38%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 5 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No real estimate
The buyer published £1 as the estimate (a placeholder, not the contract’s value), so there is nothing to forecast against.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
19 Feb 2026, 16:07 GMT
Last source update
19 Feb 2026, 16:07 GMT
Authority reference
C425464
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-015402
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
IT software development services
Delivery area
Not published
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06588a Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

19 Feb 2026 → 31 Mar 2026 · 4 dates
  1. Planning notice published245 days ago
    19 Feb 2026, 16:07 GMT
  2. Market engagement215 days ago
    20 Mar 2026, 23:59 GMT

    UHL & UHN Group requires the Provision of the AI Services relate to the provision of a Theatre Productivity application built on the FDP canonical data model and deployed entirely within the Trusts’ FDP tenant.

    The Group is seeking to appoint a Service Provider to deliver an AI services pilot that includes the design, deployment, and early-use evaluation of a real time, predictive theatre productivity platform, including these product capabilities:

    Product Capabilities in Scope of Pilot:

    • Real time, historical & forecast theatre performance metrics (utilisation, delays, overruns, cancellations)
    • AI powered predictive & prescriptive analytics (identifying risks, recommending operational actions)
    • Interactive dashboards tailored to clinicians, ops teams, and execs
    • Benchmarking across sites & specialties to identify unwarranted variation
    • Early Warning System for late starts, overruns, utilisation risks
    • Outlier detection (repeated delays, underused theatres)
    • Planned vs Actual auto matching to surface operational variances quickly
    • Impact tracking to measure which interventions work
    • Conversation AI for generating custom insights
    • Digital twin for demand, schedule, attendance
    • Seamless FDP integration using UHL & UHN canonical data model
    • Standardised definitions & metrics to support consistent decision making
    • Employ and train users; and provide change management support for successful adoption including but not limited to communications, SOPs, training, floor-walking, post-go live support

    Services in Scope of Pilot:

    • Co-design with UHL & UHN Theatre Operational, Clinical, and Improvement teams
    • Deployment within UHL & UHN FDP tenant
    • Governance & assurance activities (NHSE IG, UHL & UHN Tech Design Assurance, IG, Cyber, clinical safety, and AI Governance)
    • Operational improvement support and KPI baseline setup
    • Product development to MVP and incremental feature releases (subject to scoping and timelines agreed to by project team)
    • Evaluation of benefits jointly with UHL & UHN
    • Training, user adoption support, and theatre operational enablement
    • Participation in NHSE FDP solution exchange
  3. Tender notice expected205 days ago
    30 Mar 2026, 23:59 BST
  4. Contract starts205 days ago
    31 Mar 2026, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    19 Feb 2026, 16:07 GMT
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust

Contracting authorityPublic authority - central government GB-PPON: PWXN-8614-MPHH Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, East Midlands, LE1 6WWContact name, email

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure