Adult Substance misuse treatment services

CPV: Miscellaneous health services

Legal basis

CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)

Procurement category

Services

Notice status

Past planning notice

Procurement threshold

Unspecified in notice

Regulatory regime

Standard

Commercial structure

Stand-alone contract (no framework)

Competition type

Competitive procedure

GPA / WTO covered

Unspecified in notice

Recurring procurement

Unspecified in notice

First published

27 Jun 2024, 16:03 BST

Last source update

19 Jul 2024, 16:32 BST

Authority reference

5796

FTS notice number

2024/S 000-022563

Classification (CPV)

Miscellaneous health services

Delivery area

South East (UKJ)

Official registry OCID

ocds-h6vhtk-04731e Find a Tender

Publisher note: The London Borough of Bexley intends to award its Adult Substance misuse contract to its existing provider "South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust" using the PSR Direct Award Process C. Title of contract: Adult Substance Misuse Treatment Services, reference 5796. Providers address, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Trust Headquarters, 1st Floor, Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill , London SE5 8AZ CPV code 85140000 Value of contract is approximately £15m (includes grant funding of £332k pa) if all extensions are taken up. Length of contract including extensions is 7 years. The award of contract was made by the Council's Commissioning Board which is chaired by the Chief Executive, Paul Thorogood following recommendations by the Director of Public Health, Nicole Klynman. A comprehensive paper was taken to board which followed PSR guidance The main reasons the decision to continue with South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLAM) was made because SLAM are providing an excellent service, meeting all kpi's and the cost of the service provides very good value for money when compared to neighbouring boroughs. There are no material changes to the new contract compared to the existing contract. There were no conflicts of interest, no officers involved in the decision making process had any connection to SLAM

Submission deadline

—

No document links were published on the notice.