Yorkshire Housing Ltd: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

Large organisationCompanies House: Registered SocietyLeedsYorkshire and the Humber

Companies HouseIP030443 ↗

Procedures with an award12 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities1named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Last 12 months0no award in the last 12 months · last 14 Sept 2023
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Buyer regions1most often Yorkshire and the Humber
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Thin public record: named on 2 published awards across 1 procedure. Market sections need more published awards and are not shown.

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 1 of 1 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

Yorkshire and the Humber1 procedures · 100%

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Local authority100%(2 awards)
    2 of 2 awards are Local authority (100%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
The North Yorkshire Council1100%214 Sept 2023

Share = of the 1 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Recent awards

Latest 2 of 2 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Community Based SupportThe North Yorkshire CouncilNot publishedNot published
Home Based SupportThe North Yorkshire CouncilNot publishedNot published
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 2 of 2 awards; those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.