NHS Gloucestershire Integrated Care Board (ICB): Contract Register & Procurement Profile
NHS ODS: STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP·NHS & health·South West England·Gloucester
Find a Tender organisation id153005Websitenhsglos.nhs.uk ↗
i
Tenders you can still bid for.
Notices at tender stage whose deadline has not passed, counted the way the search counts them: a notice shows under every code and region it names.
i
Notices published in the last 12 months.
Counted per tender, not per lot, against the 12 months before where shown.
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.
i
How much of this buyer’s work goes to its three most frequent suppliers.
Share of its awarded tenders that name at least one of the top three. Each tender is counted once.
44 awarded tenders, 43 different suppliers.
Describes the record. It is not a sign of favouritism.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
What they buyi
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
i
What kind of work is bought here.
Notices by procurement category (CPV). A notice with several categories counts in each.
Last 24 months · CPV divisions on published procedures · a notice with several divisions counts in each
85 Health and social work services22 procedures · 88%72 IT services: consulting, software, internet2 procedures · 8%How they buyi
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Last 24 months · 25 notices · commercial tool and route as published on the notice, not a legal-regime claim
i
How work here is packaged.
Notices by commercial tool: a single contract, a framework, or a dynamic purchasing system.
Contract100%(25 notices)
25 of 25 notices are Contract (100%).
i
Which procedures buyers here use.
Notices by the procedure they declare: open, selective, limited or direct. Open and selective are competitions; limited and direct are not.
Limited / restricted76%(19 notices)
19 of 25 notices are Limited / restricted (76%).Open20%(5 notices)
5 of 25 notices are Open (20%).Direct award4%(1 notices)
1 of 25 notices are Direct award (4%).
i
How many companies usually bid when this buyer runs a tender.
Middle value of the bid counts on its award notices, one per lot. Only real competitions count: direct awards and framework places are left out.
Based on 5 lots from this buyer’s competitions, last 24 months.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on 25 notices across all categories, last 24 months.
i
Do this buyer’s awards land above or below its own estimates.
Each lot’s published estimate against its award, on this buyer’s competitions, like for like.
Based on 2 lots with both an estimate and an award, last 24 months. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
Who wins herei
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
i
Which suppliers win the most here.
Suppliers ranked by the number of tenders won, not by money. A supplier on one big framework with many call-offs does not outrank one that won many separate competitions.
All published awards naming a supplier · ranked by distinct procedures, not pounds · panel and call-off entries inflate award records
| Supplier | Procedures | Share | Last 24m | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Let's Talk Well | 4 | 9.1% | 2 | 5 | — |
| Primary Eyecare Services | 2 | 4.5% | 2 | 2 | — |
| Rosebank Health (Rosebank PCN) | 2 | 4.5% | 1 | 2 | — |
| GDoc Ltd | 2 | 4.5% | 0 | 3 | — |
| Tetbury Hospital Trust Ltd | 2 | 4.5% | 0 | 2 | — |
| Hadwen Health | 2 | 4.5% | 0 | 2 | — |
| Inspire Healthcare | 2 | 4.5% | 0 | 2 | — |
| Smile Together Dental CIC | 1 | 2.3% | 1 | 2 | — |
The three most frequent suppliers are named on 18% of 44 awarded procedures (each procedure counted once, so a panel shared by several of them is not double-counted); 43 distinct suppliers hold at least one. Descriptive concentration of published awards, not a statement of preference.
i
How much this buyer has awarded recently, by published values.
Sum of published VAT-exclusive awards to single suppliers, last 24 months. Left out: concession revenue, framework ceilings, repeated notices, equal-value duplicates.
Published values, not actual spend. The biggest rows are listed so you can check.
i
The middle published award value for this buyer.
Middle value of the same awards as the total above.
Largest published awards iThe biggest published awards. Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice. A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check. | Supplier | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gloucestershire Dental Treatment Hub | Smile Together Dental CIC | — | — | £24,000,000 † |
| Gloucestershire Community Eye Health Service | Primary Eyecare Services | — | — | £2,662,743 † |
| Out of Hospital Service | British Red Cross Society | 30 Jul 2025 | 2 yrs · up to 4 yrs | £1,952,000 ≈ £976k/yr |
| Mandatory Dental Services - Rapid Commissioning of Additional Units of Dental Activity on behalf of NHS Gloucestershire ICB | Coronation Dental Practice | — | — | £1,200,000 † |
| Provision of an Acute Respiratory Infection Hub (Gloucester) | Rosebank Health (Rosebank PCN) | — | — | £500,029 † |
Recent procedures
Latest 48 of 48 procedures where this authority buys, is the authority the work is for, or runs the procurement
| Procedure | Status | Published | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Upper Thames Medical Group APMS ContractHealth services | Awarded / complete | 15 Dec 2023 | — |
| Community Wellbeing Service Market Engagement EventHealth and social work services | Planned | 28 Nov 2023 | — |
| NHS Gloucestershire ICB Integrated Urgent Care ServiceCall centre | Open | 17 Oct 2023 | £78,433,822 |
| Shared Care Record (JUYI) Contract in GloucestershireClinical information system | Awarded / complete | 10 Oct 2023 | — |
| GMS Contract for Forest Health Care (to take on Westbury Surgery)Health and social work services | Awarded / complete | 2 Aug 2023 | — |
| Provision of a Dementia Advisor ServiceHealth services | Open | 3 Apr 2023 | £954,240 |
| GMS Contract for Culverhay SurgeryHealth and social work services | Awarded / complete | 23 Dec 2022 | — |
| GMS Contract for Partners in HealthHealth and social work services | Awarded / complete | 1 Aug 2022 | — |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- One profile per authority. Different spellings and registration numbers of the same body are merged into this profile. It includes tenders the authority ran for other bodies and tenders run on its behalf; spend is credited to the body that pays.
- Values are published values. Award values are what the authority published, excluding VAT and framework ceilings. They are not a budget or total spend.
- Contract end dates. 3 of 53 published contracts state an end date; those feed “Contracts ending”.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.