Find a TenderPlanned procurementPipeline notice
Published 8 Oct 2026, 08:09 BST

Official UK procurement notice

WM Catalyst Fund — UK public procurement notice

Authority: West Midlands Combined Authority (Local council)

ServicesCompetitive flexible procedureAbove threshold
Planned pipeline value£3,860,000pipeline notice — not a live tender
Tender notice expected 30 Nov 2026from the planned procurement notice
Contract term 1 yr 11 moends 1 Apr 2029 · starts 17 May 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The Creative Industries are a priority growth sector within both the UK’s Industrial Strategy and the West Midlands Growth Plan. The region has significant strengths in areas such as screen industries, gaming, CreaTech, design and fashion, with the potential to drive further economic growth, investment and job creation in these key growth sectors. The West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA) is developing the Catalyst Fund as part of the Creative Places Growth Fund, with the goal of supporting the strengthening of a limited number of specialist creative hubs and supporting the diverse diaspora of creatives across the region.

CPV: Corporate finance and venture capital services · Financial consultancy services · Portfolio management services · Project-management services other than for construction work

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1Planned 1 yr 11 mo
Contract period: 17 May 2027 — 1 Apr 2029 (1 yr 11 mo)Delivery: West Midlands
66122000 Corporate finance and venture capital services66140000 Portfolio management services66171000 Financial consultancy services79421000 Project-management services other than for construction work

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage — how this market runs before the tender is published

How West Midlands Combined Authority buys Investment banking services and related services (CPV 6612) — and who usually turns up

West Midlands Combined Authority’s own published record, next to the West Midlands market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Investment banking services and related services (CPV 6612) →

1

How the contest usually goes

This buyer’s published record next to the market where the work is delivered — contested contracts only, counted per lot

Question for the bid
This buyerWest Midlands Combined Authority · all categories
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 78 of 176 known-size awards · market: division 66, n=58
44%14%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Here, local means registered in West Midlands.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 115 of 248 known-location awards · market: division 66, n=78
46%14%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered outside West Midlands.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 14 decided notices · market: n=21
68 days64 days

Half of these awards were announced within 68 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 102 of 229 awarded contracts without a rival · market: n=68
45%38%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer28 lots with bid counts · all categories
21% had one bid
The market54 lots with bid counts · broad CPV 66
7% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid21% / 7%
Buyer: 6 of 28 lots with published bid counts. Market: 4 of 54 lots with published bid counts.
2–321% / 43%
Buyer: 6 of 28 lots with published bid counts. Market: 23 of 54 lots with published bid counts.
4–643% / 37%
Buyer: 12 of 28 lots with published bid counts. Market: 20 of 54 lots with published bid counts.
7+14% / 13%
Buyer: 4 of 28 lots with published bid counts. Market: 7 of 54 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer17 lots with estimate and award · all categories
29% below estimate
The market21 lots with estimate and award · broad CPV 66
62% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate29% / 62%
Buyer: 5 of 17 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 13 of 21 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%59% / 38%
Buyer: 10 of 17 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 8 of 21 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate12% / 0%
Buyer: 2 of 17 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 0 of 21 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors — from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 66127% single-bidPublished estimate£3,860,000
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 54 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—7% single-bid risk
Past bids on 54 similar lots
1 bid7%
4 of 54 similar past lots received 1 bid (7%).
2–343%
23 of 54 similar past lots received 2–3 (43%).
4–637%
20 of 54 similar past lots received 4–6 (37%).
7+13%
7 of 54 similar past lots received 7+ (13%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 3.5 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the winning price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A guide, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet — the published estimate is £3.9m, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

SupplierThis buyer’s earlier contractLotAward valueMatch
—

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

SupplierWon in this categoryLive contractsAward vs estimate
—
Coverage and what to read with care
  • Each figure explains itself. The on a figure says what it is, how it is counted and which scope this notice’s own record came from (class, division, all categories, or the authority’s 24-month row). The two sides are never blended. A lot’s own market is read at its delivery region where the lot names one; where it names several, or none that can be resolved, the chart falls back to the UK-wide record for the same category and says so under the bar. An empty cell means the source published nothing usable. Long form: Methodology.
  • When we call out a difference. A buyer figure is only flagged against the market when the sample is large enough that the gap is unlikely to be chance; at most two callouts appear, always phrased as a comparison with both numbers and the sample size.
  • Coverage (re-measured 5 Oct on the live record, 94,497 awarded procedures of the last three years). 51 % publish a bid count and 72 % a delivery region, so the market column reads the authority’s registered region when the notice names none, labelled. Of the 17,687 award-vs-estimate pairs, 34 % sit exactly on the estimate — the buyer published the award at the figure it advertised. n is on every figure; a thin sample is muted, never hidden, and a distribution is not drawn as percentages below ten observations.
  • “Match”, text similarity, the expected-bid figure and the distribution drawn beneath it are model outputs, not published facts or win probabilities. Find a Tender does not publish who is bidding. Never shown: contact details, payment behaviour, or a recommended price.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Procedure method
Competitive flexible procedure
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
8 Oct 2026, 08:09 BST
Last source update
8 Oct 2026, 08:09 BST
Authority reference
PRT-CREATE-ESG-2026-0002
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-094991
Latest notice
Pipeline notice (UK1)
Classification (CPV)
Corporate finance and venture capital servicesFinancial consultancy servicesPortfolio management servicesProject-management services other than for construction work
Delivery area
West Midlands (UKG3)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-078346 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

3 published dates · Europe/London
  1. Planning notice published1 day ago
    8 Oct 2026, 08:09 BST
  2. Tender notice expectedin 53 days
    30 Nov 2026, 23:59 GMT
  3. Contract startsin 220 days
    17 May 2027

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Notice history

2 events · 1 release on Find a Tender · since 8 Oct 2026
  1. Pipeline notice published
    8 Oct 2026, 08:09 BSTUK1
  2. First planning notice published
    8 Oct 2026, 08:09 BST

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

West Midlands Combined Authority

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PGMD-1353-PZVX 16 Summer Lane, Birmingham, West Midlands, B19 3SD [email protected]

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure

  • Pipeline notice planningPipeline noticeUK1Pipeline notice on Find a Tender