Official UK procurement notice
U18 Whyte Review Consultation
Authority: THE UNITED KINGDOM SPORTS COUNCIL (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionThe purpose of this consultation is to examine the breadth and experience of youth participation in the highest levels of elite international sport, and to make policy recommendations to ensure their safeguarding and welfare remains paramount. reas for consultation should include:
- The breadth of athletes for which competing in senior top level international sport as a minor, is commonplace.
- For the purposes of this project, we are looking to explore athlete's experiences at, but not limited to, Olympic Games, Paralympic Games, Commonwealth Games, World Cups/Championships, European Championships, overseas training camps.
- The current measures in place to support and protect these individuals as they engage with such experiences.
- Identification of key risks
- Recommendations for risk mitigation and potential levels of support which should be put in place.
- The level of time commitment to training to compete at international competition and for participation on their World Class Programme. Methodology Whilst there is not a fixed view on the methodology which should be used, a solely quantitative approach is unlikely to provide the richness of insight required. Therefore, we would expect qualitative methods to be deployed either solely or as part of a mixed methods approach. We welcome suggestions on the optimal approach to this project. Sample We anticipate the research will explore the experiences of those competing whilst U18 (both current and retired), their families and support staff, with a focus on early specialisation sports (e.g. Aquatics, Gymnastics, Ski & Snowboard, Skateboarding).
- Differences across Olympic and Paralympic sports
- Any circumstances which may increase an athlete's risk e.g. family circumstances.
- Any differences within demographics
- Experience at international competitions
- Are experiences at competition with anti-doping as expected and sufficiently supported?
- Cost implications of widening this research to U25s.
- Alignment with UK Sport's Safe Sport Project - undertaken by an independent project lead, to consult partners and set out recommendations on how we - as a system- could fundamentally reshape the culture, functions and services underpinning the provision of safe sport in the future. The selected supplier will be expected to align with the findings from this work to ensure no duplication of work and to understand the landscape of work which has taken place. Risks: Appointed supplier needs to have demonstrable experience in interviewing young people and dealing with sensitive topics with a clear understanding that the safeguarding of the research participants is top priority. Athlete recruitment: we welcome innovative suggestions on how we may engage with our athletes to ensure the optimum breadth of insight, especially those who may not engage with traditional survey methods. Key Deliverables:
- Establish a relevant body of evidence, taking into consideration the professional sporting landscape alongside Olympic and Paralympic sports.
- Identify key source information required and stakeholder groups for consultation
- Design and deliver an appropriate consultation process, with the youth athlete voice at the heart and detail of the optimal engagement strategy for this cohort.
- Deliver a report of findings with policy recommendations. Timeframe This research is related to the Whyte Review recommendations and therefore is a priority piece of work.
CPV: Research and development services and related consultancy services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · value publishedLot #1AwardedRenewalPublished value£41,667
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Published sub-criteria (3)
- Understanding of requirements, technical expertise, experience in similar projects, type and style of reporting, project management: 50%
- Value for money: 25%
- EDI, Sustainability, Added Value: 25%
Published award criteria (3)
- Value for money
- Understanding of requirements, technical expertise, experience in similar projects, type and style of reporting, project management
- EDI, Sustainability, Added Value
- Price carries 25 of 100 points: a 10% discount moves about 2.5 points. The method statement decides this lot, not the discount.
Price arithmetic assumes straight proportional scoring; the tender pack may use another formula.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Below threshold - open competition
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Awarded
- Procurement threshold
- Below threshold
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 29 May 2025, 14:53 BST
- Last source update
- 22 Jul 2026, 11:42 BST
- Authority reference
U1829052025- FTS notice number
2025/S 000-028506- Latest notice
- Contract details notice (UK7)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0528f4Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- 30 Jun 2025, 12:00 BST
- Clarification deadline
- 17 Jun 2025, 23:59 BST
- Electronic submission
- Not allowed
Timeline
29 May 2025 → 22 Jul 2026 · 5 dates- Tender notice published29 May 2025, 14:53 BST
- Clarification questions by17 Jun 2025, 23:59 BST
- Submission deadline30 Jun 2025, 12:00 BST
- Contract starts1 Aug 2025, 00:00 BST
- Latest notice published90 days ago22 Jul 2026, 11:42 BST
Notice history
4 events · 3 releases on Find a Tender · since 29 May 2025- Tender notice published29 May 2025, 14:53 BSTUK4
- Tender notice published30 May 2025, 10:31 BSTUK4
- Contract details notice published22 Jul 2026, 11:42 BSTUK7
- Status changed to complete22 Jul 2026, 11:42 BST
Published amendments (1)
Addition of the detailed tender document
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Published awards, contracts and bid statistics, not a forecast| Awarded to | Value | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leeds Beckett University | £42,115 † | — | Awarded |
Contracts
U18 Whyte Review Consultation · Leeds Beckett University
- Signed
- 6 Jul 2026
- Value
- £42,115
- Period
- 22 Jul 2026 – 31 May 2027
- Status
- active
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Bidders & participating suppliers
1 commercial party on the notice- Leeds Beckett UniversityAwarded supplier
Official documents & specifications (4)
Official links; attachments are not copiedTender pack and attachments
- Bidding documents and specifications Detailed Tender Document
Notices published for this procedure
- Contract details notice Contract details notice on Find a Tender
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender