Find a Tender
complete
Official procurement procedure
The Supply and In-Service Support Of the Soft Landing System (SLS)
Safety equipment
Safety training services
Site-safety equipment
UK
Published value
Not published
Submission deadline Not published
Lots published1
Procurement Executive Summary
AI & Search Synopsis
Generated from official OCDS record
Tenderline Synopsis: Ministry of Defence: "The Supply and In-Service Support Of the Soft Landing System (SLS)". Published status: complete. Published value: Value not published. 1 published lot. Submission deadline not published. See the official notice for participation instructions.
| Contracting Authority | Ministry of Defence | Scope & Categories | Not published | Submission Window | complete No deadline published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Submission Gateway | Direct notice route | Legal Basis & Regime | Standard procurement | Estimated Value (exc. VAT) | Not published |
Bidder Intelligence · Authority Profile: Ministry of Defence
Market Analytics
Derived from OCDS awards & bid statistics
Published history for Ministry of Defence. These figures describe retained records, not a forecast of bids or a measure of buyer bias.
Average Price Reduction
Not availableInsufficient comparable data
Competition Density
3.3Bids / Report
Supplier ConcentrationNo estimate
Insufficient attributable awardsNo concentration estimate availablePayment Terms
Check noticePublished terms
Coverage: 249 active published awards; 99 bid reports (which may be per lot). Supplier values exclude multi-supplier awards, frameworks and DPS, and use GBP only. They are published award values, not payments. Price reduction compares single-lot, single-award, single-supplier GBP procedures with explicitly non-framework/non-DPS status; increases remain in the average. Unpublished data stays unknown. Awarded suppliers are winners, not all bidders.
Procedure terms
Contracting AuthorityMinistry of Defence | Procedure methodNot published | Procurement categoryNot published |
Statuscomplete | Framework / DPSNot published | CompetitionNot published |
Above thresholdNot published | Legal basisNot published | Tender period startsNot published |
Clarification deadlineNot published | Electronic submissionNot published | Submission languagesNot published |
Published31 May 2022, 11:53 BST | Last source update31 May 2022, 11:53 BST | Recurring procurementNot published |
ClassificationSafety equipment, Safety training services, Site-safety equipment | ||
Delivery area UK | ||
OCIDocds-h6vhtk-0341f2 | ||
What is being bought
The provision of new and continued through-life support of existing fall bag Soft Landing Systems (“SLS”) including repair, maintenance, spares provision, training and technical support.
What changed
From the official release history
- Status changed to complete
31 May 2022, 11:53 BST - Official notice release published
31 May 2022, 11:53 BST - Buyer information updated
31 May 2022, 11:53 BST
Lots and requirements (1)
Published by the contracting authority
- Lot 1 · #1Individual lot title not publishedStatus not publishedPublished valueNot publishedThe Secretary of State for Defence intends to enter into a contract with Forest Safety Group Ltd (“Forest”) for the continued through-life support of existing fall bag Soft Landing Systems (“SLS”) including repair, maintenance, spares provision, training and technical support, together with the purchase of additional compatible SLS (“the Contract”). The duration of the new Contract will be five years together with two additional individual option years. The approximate value of the Contract is estimated to be £2.8 million ex VAT including the full exercise of the option years. In accordance with regulation 4 of The Defence and Security Public Contracts (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019/697) this procurement falls to be regulated under the provisions of the Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011 as amended (in particular by SI 2019/697 and SI 2020/1450). Prior publication of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Union is no longer appropriate. It is considered that the award of the contract without prior publication of a contract notice in the UK e-notification service (in accordance with the relevant legislation) is lawful in accordance with regulations 16(1)(a)(ii) and 16(1)(b)(i) of the DSPCR 2011 for technical reasons and for the purchase of additional supplies. In respect of the existing supplies of SLS, Forest is the owner of several patents and design rights for the SLS and has exclusivity arrangements for certain materials used in the SLS. The Authority does not have sufficient rights in the information in the SLS to provide to an alternative supplier to manufacture new SLS equipment and undertake the repair, maintenance, training and subsequent safety certification of the new or existing supplies to the reasonable satisfaction of the Authority. Furthermore, as Design Authority only Forest has the accumulated expertise and technical know-how at its disposal required to undertake this work. This includes the intimate knowledge and understanding of the existing equipment used across the Authority’s platforms and the extreme range of operating environments and climactic conditions in which they are deployed, and for which the SLS have been specifically designed (to include impermeability to Aviation Fuel and paints, oils & lubricants, flame retardancy and UV stability). In respect of the additional supplies, to obtain supplies from a different contractor would create disproportionate technical difficulties in the operation and maintenance of the existing equipment and potential unacceptable interoperability and compatibility risks between all such existing and new equipment both per platform and between platforms, especially considering the life-saving safety criticality of the equipment. Furthermore it would cause significant inconvenience and substantial duplication of costs for the Authority. It is also vital that end users are trained and fully competent in the use of a single system. It would be impracticable and inadvisable for users to be trained to use more than one system. An attempt to integrate and utilise different proprietary systems in the environments and conditions in which they are deployed could lead to mistakes and potentially pose a risk to life.Contract periodNot publishedEligibilityNot publishedOptions / renewalNot published
Timeline
- Procedure published
31 May 2022, 11:53 BST - Award active
Not published · Not published - Contract active
Signed 31 May 2022, 00:00 BST · £2,800,000
Commercial outcome and competition
Awards Forest Safety Group LTD Not published · Not published · active |
Contracts The Supply and In-Service Support Of the Soft Landing System (SLS) £2,800,000 · signed 31 May 2022, 00:00 BST · active |
Bid statisticsNo aggregate bid statistics published |
Buyer and organisations in this procedure
Ministry of Defence
Contracting authority GB-FTS-5483Documents (0)
Official links; attachments are not copied
No linked documents are published
Related procedures (0)
No related procedures published
Planning and rationale
Planning budgetNot published |
No-engagement rationaleNot published |
Procedure rationaleThe Secretary of State for Defence intends to enter into a contract with Forest Safety Group Ltd (“Forest”) for the continued through-life support of existing fall bag Soft Landing Systems (“SLS”) including repair, maintenance, spares provision, training and technical support, together with the purchase of additional compatible SLS (“the Contract”). The duration of the new Contract will be five years together with two additional individual option years. The approximate value of the Contract is estimated to be £2.8 million ex VAT including the full exercise of the option years.
In accordance with regulation 4 of The Defence and Security Public Contracts (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019/697) this procurement falls to be regulated under the provisions of the Defence and Security Public Contracts Regulations 2011 as amended (in particular by SI 2019/697 and SI 2020/1450). Prior publication of a contract notice in the Official Journal of the European Union is no longer appropriate.
It is considered that the award of the contract without prior publication of a contract notice in the UK e-notification service (in accordance with the relevant legislation) is lawful in accordance with regulations 16(1)(a)(ii) and 16(1)(b)(i) of the DSPCR 2011 for technical reasons and for the purchase of additional supplies.
In respect of the existing supplies of SLS, Forest is the owner of several patents and design rights for the SLS and has exclusivity arrangements for certain materials used in the SLS. The Authority does not have sufficient rights in the information in the SLS to provide to an alternative supplier to manufacture new SLS equipment and undertake the repair, maintenance, training and subsequent safety certification of the new or existing supplies to the reasonable satisfaction of the Authority.
Furthermore, as Design Authority only Forest has the accumulated expertise and technical know-how at its disposal required to undertake this work. This includes the intimate knowledge and understanding of the existing equipment used across the Authority’s platforms and the extreme range of operating environments and climactic conditions in which they are deployed, and for which the SLS have been specifically designed (to include impermeability to Aviation Fuel and paints, oils & lubricants, flame retardancy and UV stability).
In respect of the additional supplies, to obtain supplies from a different contractor would create disproportionate technical difficulties in the operation and maintenance of the existing equipment and potential unacceptable interoperability and compatibility risks between all such existing and new equipment both per platform and between platforms, especially considering the life-saving safety criticality of the equipment. Furthermore it would cause significant inconvenience and substantial duplication of costs for the Authority.
It is also vital that end users are trained and fully competent in the use of a single system. It would be impracticable and inadvisable for users to be trained to use more than one system.
An attempt to integrate and utilise different proprietary systems in the environments and conditions in which they are deployed could lead to mistakes and potentially pose a risk to life. |