Find a TenderOpen for tender Tender notice
Published 23 Sept 2026, 14:28 BST

Official UK procurement notice

The management of Solent Meads golf course

Authority: Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (Local council)

ServicesOpen procedureAbove thresholdConcessionSME suitable
Published estimate£5,000,000≈ £200k / year · £6,000,000 inc. VAT
Submission deadline 23 Oct 202614:00 BST · 29d 16h left
Clarification cut-off 9 Oct 2026questions to the authority
Contract term 25 yrsstarts 1 Dec 2026
Bids per lot · this authority 3all categories · n=78 · competition analysis ↓

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The council (the grantor) intends to grant a person or supplier (the concessionaire) the right to operate - as the seller of certain goods or services - as a business within a premises or other asset belonging to the grantor in return for an appropriate fee. The concessionaire pays the grantor.

• The premises is Solent Meads Golf Course in Southbourne, Dorset.

• The goods or services is operation of the Solent Meads Golf Course

The successful concessionaire will be granted the right to operate as the seller of water sports activities and associated retail services within Council-owned premises.

The anticipated start date of the contract is December 2026. The contract will be for 25 years with no extensions.

CPV: Recreational, cultural and sporting services · Sports goods and equipment

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · value published
Lot #1Lot 1 25 yrsSMEPublished value£5,000,000
Contract period: 1 Dec 2026 — 30 Nov 2051 (25 yrs)Eligibility: SME eligibleDelivery: South WestTurnover guideline: ~£399,737/yr≈ 2× annual value
Value
£5,000,000 exc. VAT · £6,000,000 inc. VAT
37400000 Sports goods and equipment92000000 Recreational, cultural and sporting services

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

What it takes to win
i

How this buyer will score bids.

The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).

Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published — the tender pack may add more
How bids are scored
  • Criteria included in Tender Response Part D

No conditions of participation were published on the notice; check the tender documents.

Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid

How Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council buys Sports goods and equipment (CPV 3740) — and who usually turns up

Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council’s own published record, next to the South West England market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Sports goods and equipment (CPV 3740)

1

How the contest usually goes

Left: this authority. Right: the market where the work is delivered. Bids and award-vs-estimate pairs are per lot, from contested contracts only — direct awards (including PA 2023 transparency notices) report one bid by definition and are left out. On Procurement Act 2023 notices the count is the tenders assessed at the final stage, not every submission received; pairs compare like with like (VAT-exclusive, or VAT-inclusive on both sides). Empty means nothing was published, not filled in from elsewhere.

This authority

Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council

contract notices in 36 months: 1 in CPV 3740 · 3 in division 37 (1 route not published) · 152 in all categories (26 without competition · 31 route not published)

Bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for work like this.

Middle value of published bid counts, one per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 78 lots. 23 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 2) and 55 from older notices (bids received, middle 3).

Nothing is filled in from UK-wide numbers. An empty tile means nothing usable was published.

3all categories · 36m · n=78 lots
Single-bid lots
i

How often only one company bid.

Share of lots that received exactly one bid, on the same competitions as the bids figure.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 78 lots.

High means a thin market or an incumbent that is hard to beat.

19%all categories · 36m · n=78 lots
Award vs estimate
i

Do awards for work like this land above or below the estimate.

Estimate against award per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 49 pairs.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

at estimateall categories · 36m · n=49 pairs
Deadline → award date
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 19 notices.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

44dall categories · 36m · n=19 notices
Notice updates
i

How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.

Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 24 months: 248 notices.

Last 24 months.

0all categories · 24m · n=248 notices
Awarded without competition
i

How often this buyer awards without a competition.

Direct or limited awards as a share of its notices that say which procedure was used. These routes are legal in defined cases. This is just the record.

Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 121 notices.

Last 36 months.

21%all categories · 36m · n=121 notices
Bids per lot robust · n=78
i

How the number of bidders is spread across lots.

Each lot with a published bid count is put in a band: one bid, two to three, four to six, seven or more. Real competitions only.

Based on 78 lots on 55 contested notices · all categories, last 36 months.

  • 1 bid 19%
  • 2–3 37%
  • 4–6 23%
  • 7+ 21%

Median 3 · 78 lots on 55 contested notices · all categories.

Winning award vs estimate robust · n=49
i

How often winners come in below, near or above the estimate.

Each lot with both an estimate and an award is placed by how far the award sat from the estimate.

Based on 49 lot pairs · all categories, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

  • Below estimate 18%
  • Within ±2% 73%
  • Above estimate 8%

49 lot pairs · all categories.

The market · delivery region

South West England · Sports goods and equipment (CPV 3740)

contract notices delivered in South West England in 36 months: 3 in CPV 3740 (3 competed) · 98 in division 37 (78 competed, 7 route not published)

Bids per lot
i

How many companies usually bid for work like this.

Middle value of published bid counts, one per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 37), last 36 months: 25 lots. 23 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 3) and 2 from older notices (bids received, middle 5).

Nothing is filled in from UK-wide numbers. An empty tile means nothing usable was published.

4division 37 · 36m · n=25 lots
Single-bid lots
i

How often only one company bid.

Share of lots that received exactly one bid, on the same competitions as the bids figure.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 37), last 36 months: 25 lots.

High means a thin market or an incumbent that is hard to beat.

4%division 37 · 36m · n=25 lots
Award vs estimate
i

Do awards for work like this land above or below the estimate.

Estimate against award per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 37), last 36 months: 24 pairs.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

at estimatedivision 37 · 36m · n=24 pairs
Deadline → award date
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 37), last 36 months: 24 notices.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

30ddivision 37 · 36m · n=24 notices
SME bidders
i

How much of this market goes to small and medium firms.

SME bidders where buyers published the split, otherwise SME winners.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 37), last 36 months: 24 lots.

Last 36 months.

91%division 37 · 36m · n=24 lots
Winners based in the region
i

How much work like this goes to companies based in the delivery region.

Awards in this category delivered here where the winner’s registered address is in the region.

Based on this region’s tenders in this industry (CPV 37), last 36 months: 41 awards.

Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.

Last 36 months.

78%division 37 · 36m · n=41 awards
Bids per lot robust · n=25
i

How the number of bidders is spread across lots.

Each lot with a published bid count is put in a band: one bid, two to three, four to six, seven or more. Real competitions only.

Based on 25 lots on 25 contested notices · division 37, last 36 months.

  • 1 bid 4%
  • 2–3 44%
  • 4–6 44%
  • 7+ 8%

Median 4 · 25 lots on 25 contested notices · division 37.

Winning award vs estimate robust · n=24
i

How often winners come in below, near or above the estimate.

Each lot with both an estimate and an award is placed by how far the award sat from the estimate.

Based on 24 lot pairs · division 37, last 36 months.

A past pattern, not a price to bid.

  • Below estimate 25%
  • Within ±2% 54%
  • Above estimate 21%

24 lot pairs · division 37.

robust · n=49
i

Where this tender’s estimate would land if the usual pattern repeats.

We apply the buyer’s usual movement between estimate and award (or the region’s) to the estimate on this notice.

Based on this buyer’s own usual movement over 49 lots (all categories), applied to the £5,000,000 estimate on this notice.

A benchmark, not a price to bid.

Awards in Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (all categories, n=49 pairs) land a median at estimate: on this notice’s £5,000,000 that is about £5,000,000. Context for a bid, not a recommended price.
Coverage and what to read with care
  • Each tile explains itself. The on a figure says what it is, how it is counted and which scope this notice’s own record came from (class, division, all categories, or the authority’s 24-month row). The two columns are never blended and nothing is filled from a UK-wide figure; an empty tile means the source published nothing usable. Long form: Methodology.
  • Coverage. Roughly 40 % of notices publish a bid count; about half publish an ITL1 delivery location, so the market column reads the authority’s registered region when the notice has none (labelled). About 30 % of award-vs-estimate pairs are exact matches — the buyer published the award at the estimate. n is on every figure; a thin sample is muted, never hidden.
  • “Match” and “relevance” are model scores from the nightly matcher, not published facts. Find a Tender does not publish who is bidding. Never shown: contact details, payment behaviour, or a recommended price.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Procedure method
Open procedure
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Open for tender
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Concession
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
No (one-off requirement)
First published
23 Sept 2026, 14:28 BST
Last source update
23 Sept 2026, 14:28 BST
Award evaluation window
Submission end — 1 Dec 2026, 23:59 GMT
Authority reference
DN823502
Latest notice
Tender notice (UK4)
Classification (CPV)
Recreational, cultural and sporting servicesSports goods and equipment
Delivery area
South West (UKK24)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0778b4 Find a Tender

How to participate & submission route

Official notice Submit via ProContract (Due North)
Submission portal named on this notice: ProContract (Due North) · Who buys & how to bid on ProContract
Supplier login requiredElectronic submission allowedLanguage: EN
Access & registration note: Free · short registration with manual review; public opportunity list
Expression of interest (EOI)
Tender submission deadline
23 Oct 2026, 14:00 BST
Clarification deadline
9 Oct 2026, 00:00 BST
Submission channel
Official e-sourcing portal
Electronic submission
Allowed
Accepted languages
en
Detailed submission instructions & authority contactsFrom official release
Published estimate £5,000,000 excludes VAT (£6,000,000 including VAT).

Timeline

5 published dates · Europe/London
  1. Tender notice publishedearlier today
    23 Sept 2026, 14:28 BST
  2. Clarification questions byin 15 days
    9 Oct 2026, 00:00 BST
  3. Submission deadlinein 30 days
    23 Oct 2026, 14:00 BST
  4. Contract startsin 68 days
    1 Dec 2026, 00:00 GMT
  5. Award decision expected byin 69 days
    1 Dec 2026, 23:59 GMT

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Nothing awarded yet
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Tender notice published
    23 Sept 2026, 14:28 BSTUK4

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PHYY-7342-PRHH BCP Council Civic Centre, Bournemouth, South West, BH2 6DY [email protected]

Official documents & specifications (3)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Tender pack and attachments

  • Conflict of interest declarationtenderConflict of interest declarationNot published
  • Technical specifications tenderTechnical specifications

Notices published for this procedure

  • Tender notice tenderTender noticeUK4Tender notice on Find a Tender