Official UK procurement notice
Provision of two Adult Recovery Houses
Authority: South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (Central government)
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM) intends to undertake a procurement under the Provider Selection Regime for the provision of two Adult Recovery Houses. This notice provides advance notice information to the market so that interested providers can prepare for the forthcoming tender.<br/> <br/>Service overview<br/> <br/>The service comprises 12 beds across two locations:<br/>.
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (SLaM) intends to undertake a procurement under the Provider Selection Regime for the provision of two Adult Recovery Houses. This notice provides advance notice information to the market so that interested providers can prepare for the forthcoming tender.<br/> <br/>Service overview<br/> <br/>The service comprises 12 beds across two locations:<br/>
- Mountsfield Recovery House six beds at 3 Heather Close, Lewisham, SE13 6UG<br/>
- Winchilsea Recovery House six beds at Bethlem Royal Hospital, Beckenham, BR3 3BX.<br/> <br/>Both houses will operate 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, supporting adults experiencing significant mental health distress across Croydon, Lambeth, Southwark and Lewisham. The service will provide short-term, recovery-focused residential support to help prevent deterioration and avoid hospital admission where appropriate. Stays will typically be up to seven days. Step down admissions will be accepted by exception, subject to SLaM approval. Key requirements include:<br/>
- Joint working with SLaM clinical teams on referrals, risk management and discharge<br/>
- Responses to referrals within two hours and admissions available 24 hours a day<br/>
- At least two organised recovery, therapeutic or wellbeing activities each day<br/>
- Dedicated paid peer support<br/>
- A minimum of two waking night staff at each house<br/>
- Provision and maintenance of furnishings and equipment.
CPV: Health services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · value publishedLot #1This will be subject to a competitive tender processPlannedPublished value£2,000,000
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
- Price
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust buys Health services (CPV 8510), and who usually turns up
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Health services (CPV 8510) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in Greater London.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 63 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid35% / 32%
2–325% / 32%
4–615% / 23%
7+25% / 13%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate55% / 39%
Within ±2%36% / 54%
Above estimate9% / 7%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1This will be subject to a competitive tender processCPV 8510Published estimate£2.0m
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 60 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid32%
2–332%
4–623%
7+13%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly. Contracts Finder contracts appear on the Retender Radar, not yet in these figures.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 4 Nov 2026, 12:14 GMT
- Last source update
- 4 Nov 2026, 12:14 GMT
- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-104618- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-07b2cbFind a Tender
How it was run
Official noticeTender documents are also served through a separate tool: https://atamis-1928.my.site.com/s/Welcome ↗
- Submission deadline
- —
- Submission channel
- {"electronicSubmission","written"}
Timeline
4 Nov 2026 → 16 Nov 2026 · 2 dates- Notice published38h ago4 Nov 2026, 12:14 GMT
- Today6 Nov 2026
- Tender notice expectedin 9 days16 Nov 2026
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Dispute resolution & review bodies
- High CourtReview body
Official documents & specifications
Official links; attachments are not copiedNo document links were published on the notice.