Official UK procurement notice
PRO005166 - ORiW - Design and Integration Partner
Authority: United Utilities Water Limited (Public body)
This notice relates to tender activity for the provision of certain design and integration services, as explained below. United Utilities Water Limited (UU) proposes to deliver a programme titled Only Rainwater into Windermere (ORiW), with the ambition to make Windermere the cleanest lake in England by removing discharges from both public and private sources, while also addressing highway runoff. This Scope of Requirements does not include agricultural impacts; these are being considered by other programmes.
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionThis notice relates to tender activity for the provision of certain design and integration services, as explained below. United Utilities Water Limited (UU) proposes to deliver a programme titled Only Rainwater into Windermere (ORiW), with the ambition to make Windermere the cleanest lake in England by removing discharges from both public and private sources, while also addressing highway runoff. This is a long-term, transformational programme designed to protect the lake's ecology, water quality and amenity value for future generations. The target end state is "Only Rainwater into Windermere", restoring the lake as close as possible to its natural condition and reducing the risk of harmful algal blooms and chemicals. The programme will deliver resilient wastewater infrastructure that supports communities, businesses and the wider National Park, while creating a potential blueprint for freshwater restoration across England. This Scope of Requirements does not include agricultural impacts; these are being considered by other programmes. A coalition has been established to develop and deliver the ORiW feasibility phase. It brings together key stakeholders, including UU, local authorities, regulators and environmental organisations, to provide strategic direction and has sponsored the commission of a ‘feasibility study’ to ascertain the art of the possible for achieving ORiW. Through the commission there are now feasible options for achieving the ambition, to improve water quality, and enhance the environmental resilience of the Windermere catchment, through a proposed ORiW system and wider infrastructure. The proposed ORiW system is made up of multiple workstreams;
- First Time Sewerage (FTS), connecting properties to the public sewer network that are currently outside of the network and have never previously been connected to it.
- First time Treatment (FTT), for the sites where FTS is not possible, a remote treatment solution will be implemented.
- Reduced weather dependent flow, surface water management and management and treatment of highways runoff through the use of nature- based solutions where possible across the catchment.
- Construction of tunnel, sewers, rising mains and associated infrastructure.
- Upgrade of an existing wastewater treatment works and discharge point. UU anticipates that the ORiW system and the other strategic wastewater transfer and treatment infrastructure required for the ORiW programme (including the tunnel, rising mains, pumping stations, wastewater treatment facilities, associated drainage works and all ancillary infrastructure), will be promoted through a Development Consent Order (DCO) as a Nationally Significant Infrastructure Project (NSIP), subject to Section 35 approval by Defra. [SM1.1][WD1.2] UU are launching a competitive tendering procedure for the appointment of a Design and Integration Partner (D&IP) who will be responsible for supporting the next phase of this programme, designing the ORiW system, including whole system integration, to achieve the programme vision. UU requires the D&IP to complete feasibility, outline design, constructability and other related activities to obtain the necessary approvals and consents for the programme to proceed to the delivery phase for the preferred solution. Accordingly, the D&IP will also be responsible for the delivery of the DCO and planning approvals. As such, the outline design needs to fully support and integrate with the DCO, Town and Country Planning Act (TCPA) and land acquisition and access processes. At a high level, the initial scope of requirements for the D&IP will include, but may not be limited to the following activities across each of the workstreams of the ORiW system;
- Outline Design
- Planning, Consents and Land
- Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) and surveys
- Stakeholder and Customer Engagement
- Land Agency, Referencing and Surveying
- Preparation and submission of planning applications and all supporting information
- Preparation and submission of the DCO and all supporting information
- Site Investigation (SI)
- Early Contractor involvement (ECI)
- Supporting UU in meeting reporting requirements with Ofwat i.e. PR29 Price Review
- Supporting UU with any required preparation, development and submission of information for the Water Industry National Environment Programme (WINEP) and Drainage and Wastewater Management Plan (DWMP) UU require a D&IP who has the capability and experience to ensure coordination over integration of all elements of the ORiW system and all other related activities that are required. The D&IP will also need to be capable of leading the overall delivery strategy, managing interfaces across the programme, maintaining design consistency, and ensuring that the complete solution meets the requirements to obtain the necessary approvals and consents. UU is continuing to consider its approach to the delivery phase of the programme and anticipates that it may need ongoing support from the D&IP into the delivery phase to provide continuity throughout the programme lifecycle. The precise form that this ongoing support may take will be dependent on the precise delivery model that UU adopt for the delivery phase, but the role to be played by the D&IP may include typical professional services support of the nature to be expected of a design and integration professional services consultant acting for a client in relation to the delivery phase of a major engineering and construction project, for example (without limitation) either:
- The D&IP acting as system integrator and detailed design partner to either UU and/or any prime contractor engaged in relation to the programme.
- The D&IP acting as a system integrator partner to provide support across different workstreams and work packages forming part of the programme so that the overall programme is delivered as seamlessly as possible.
- Providing alternative services to support UU’s client-side management of delivery partners engaged to undertake the delivery phase of the programme. From a contractual perspective, this may entail:
- Continuing consultancy services (e.g. oversight of delivery contractors or supporting the coordination between delivery contractors and/or developing the detail of design work undertaken during the development phase) provided by the D&IP on the same, or similar, call-off contract terms and conditions as are prescribed under the framework agreement for the development phase of the Programme; or
- An evolution of the delivery model and associated call-off terms and conditions envisaged under the framework agreement for the development phase of the Programme to align to the Client’s proposed delivery model for the delivery phase of the Programme, including for example: o requiring the D&IP to enter into a strategic sub-contract with one or more delivery contractors appointed by the Client for the provision of detailed design services; or o the provision by the D&IP of design and integration services to the Client as part of an integrated “Enterprise” delivery model incorporating the Client, D&IP and delivery contractors and designed to create aligned incentives across all such participants. An outline of the potential structure and commercial proposition of this Enterprise model, including the call-off contract terms and conditions that could be used to effect it, will be set out in the framework agreement on an indicative basis (recognising that the precise terms and conditions of any call-off contract and the model more broadly would be developed separately by UU and refined through engagement with other potential Enterprise participants). Whatever model is adopted, the Client will ensure that the balance of risk and reward, and the potential commercial and financial impact on the D&IP, is similar and broadly equivalent to the balance struck in the call-off terms and conditions for the development phase. This means that UU will endeavour to ensure that, as and when any call-off terms and conditions are entered into, the D&IP would not be materially better off under the enterprise or alliance type model, in all material respects, compared to the position under a continuation of the development phase arrangements. Anticipated value of each role;
- Design & Integration Partner (pre delivery phase) > 4 years = circa £60-100m
- System Integrator Partner (during delivery phase) > up to a further 9 years in increments at UUs discretion = circa £100m (subject to CPIH)
- System Integrator and Detailed Design Partner (during delivery phase) > up to a further 9 years in increments at UUs discretion = circa £500m (subject to CPIH) Please note that the total value is given as a range (£60m to £600m) which includes the minimum and maximum total estimated values across those roles. As explained above, the system integrator partner (during delivery phase) and system integrator and detailed design partner roles are alternatives and so the combined value of each is not included in the total (only the higher of the two).
- How the procedure runs: As set out in the tender documents
CPV: Agricultural services · Archaeological services · Civil engineering consultancy services · Construction consultancy services · Construction economics services · Construction management services · Construction project management services · Construction-related services · Consultative engineering and construction services · Consulting services for water-supply and waste consultancy · Design consultancy services · Design-modelling services · +31 more
How this framework works
From the published notice- Type
- Closed framework
- Call-offs
- call-offs are awarded directly to appointed suppliers, without further competition
- Framework period
- 4 yrs · up to 13 yrs from 15 Apr 2027
Published description of the framework
Refer to tender documentation.
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · value publishedLot #1RenewalPublished value£600,000,000
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Published sub-criteria (2)
- Technical: 60%
- Commercial: 40%
Published award criteria (2)
- Commercial
- Technical
- Price carries 40 of 100 points: a 10% discount moves about 4 points. The method statement decides this lot, not the discount.
- “PRO005166 - ORiW - Design and Integration Partner” is a framework: the contest is a place on its panel, not a single contract, and call-offs are awarded directly: getting appointed is the whole game.
Price arithmetic assumes straight proportional scoring; the tender pack may use another formula.
Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid
How United Utilities Water Limited buys Engineering-related scientific and technical services (CPV 7135), and who usually turns up
United Utilities Water Limited’s published record next to the market for the same work. Compared with other frameworks and DPS only. Whole-market view: Engineering-related scientific and technical services (CPV 7135) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 110 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Missing bid counts may hide more single-bid awards. This share is a minimum.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid0% / 2%
2–30% / 13%
4–678% / 28%
7+22% / 57%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
On a framework or DPS, prices are agreed when work is called off.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Not comparable on a framework or DPS: the price is set later, on each call-off.
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 7135Published estimate£600m
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid0%
2–38%
4–658%
7+34%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| £349m60 awards in 36m · last this month | 8 live · £32m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=5 | |
| £30m50 awards in 36m · last 1 month ago | 18 live · £17m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=7 | |
| £786k9 awards in 36m · last 1 month ago | 4 live · £557k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 25% below n=5 | |
Adler and Allan LtdLarge | £1.8m17 awards in 36m · last 3 months ago | 2 live · £34k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 13% above n=4 |
| £108k1 award in 36m · last 6 months ago | 1 live · £108k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly. Contracts Finder contracts appear on the Retender Radar, not yet in these figures.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Competitive flexible procedure
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Open for tender
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Utilities
- Commercial structure
- Framework agreement
- Who may use this agreement
- Not stated in the notice; call-off rights may be limited to the establishing authority
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 5 Nov 2026, 17:27 GMT
- Last source update
- 5 Nov 2026, 17:27 GMT
- Award evaluation window
- Submission end – 1 Apr 2027
- Authority reference
PRO005166- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-105451- Latest notice
- Tender notice (UK4)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-07b5daFind a Tender
- How it runs
As set out in the tender documents
How to participate & submission route
Official notice Submit via EU-Supply (CTM)- Requests to participate (first stage)
- —
- Appointment period ends
- 30 Nov 2026, 14:00 GMT
- Clarification deadline
- 17 Nov 2026, 14:00 GMT
- Submission channel
- Official e-sourcing portal
- Electronic submission
- Allowed
- Accepted languages
- en
Timeline
5 Nov 2026 → 15 Apr 2027 · 5 dates- Tender notice published1h ago5 Nov 2026, 17:27 GMT
- Today5 Nov 2026
- Clarification questions byin 11 days17 Nov 2026, 14:00 GMT
- Admission / appointment period endsin 24 days · period end, not a bid countdown30 Nov 2026, 14:00 GMT
- Award decision expected byin 147 days1 Apr 2027, 23:59 BST
- Contract startsin 160 days15 Apr 2027
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Tender notice published5 Nov 2026, 17:27 GMTUK4
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Nothing awarded yet- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender