Official UK procurement notice
PHD Strategic Pricing, Ticketing and Demand Study
Authority: Royal Navy Museums (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionPHD has identified a need for specialist expertise to address several strategic questions that cannot be answered internally with sufficient confidence. Existing evidence suggests pricing, admissions structure and visitor decision-making are affecting demand and conversion. However, the organisation requires independent analysis and modelling to understand:
- Whether current pricing levels suppress demand.
- How visitor segments respond to price and product structure.
- The impact of removing lower-commitment admission products.
- The relationship between yield, volume and long-term sustainability.
- The role of digital channels in visitor conversion.
- How future ticketing structures can support both commercial performance and audience growth.
Deliverables
- The commission is expected to produce:
- A recommended admissions architecture.
- A recommended pricing framework.
- Recommendations regarding lower-priced entry products.
- Recommendations regarding Gift Aid.
- Recommendations regarding discounting.
- Recommendations regarding affiliate, trade and third-party sales.
- A practical implementation roadmap for Easter 2027.
Procurement Structure
An open competitive procurement exercise will be undertaken.
Potential suppliers will be invited to submit proposals detailing:
- Understanding of the brief.
- Proposed methodology.
- Relevant experience.
- Project team.
- Cost proposal.
- Delivery timetable.
Submissions will be evaluated against:
- Understanding of strategic challenge.
- Methodology and robustness.
- Relevant expertise.
- Practical applicability.
- Value for money.
- Quality of proposed team.
Consortium bids are welcomed where they bring together complementary expertise across pricing strategy, behavioural insight, visitor research, digital analytics and commercial implementation. One organisation should be identified as lead contractor and assume overall responsibility for delivery.
Contract Management
The contract will be managed by the Head of Audiences and Revenue Marketing (Racheal Brasier) with support from Sharna Bennett (Performance and CRM Lead).
Regular project meetings will be held throughout delivery. Key milestone outputs will be reviewed by an internal project steering group representing:
- Portsmouth Historic Dockyard Operations with representation from MRT and RNM
Contract Duration
18 months
The core consultancy work is expected to complete within approximately 6-9 months, with the remaining term allowing for validation, implementation support and follow-up advice as required.
Contract Value
The estimated contract value is between £60,000 and £120,000 excluding VAT, based on the indicative project scale identified through an initial document sent out to potential suppliers. Initial market research was undertaken with a variety of suppliers that outlined different approaches to the work - the estimates provided ranged from £60,000 - £120,000.
Funding is expected to be met from approved budgets and supports long-term commercial growth priorities for both RNM and MRT.
Failure to undertake the study may result in:
- Continued suppression of visitor demand.
- Reduced accessibility for key audience segments.
- Inefficient pricing structures.
- Lost admissions income.
- Poor strategic decision-making based on incomplete evidence.
- Failure to optimise the balance between revenue generation and audience growth.
Supplier Suitability Assessment
Suppliers will be assessed against:
- Understanding of the strategic challenge (15%).
- Methodology and approach (15%).
- Relevant experience and expertise (15%).
- Project team quality (15%).
- Deliverability and practical recommendations (15%).
- Value for money (15%).
- Sustainability (10%)
Evaluation criteria reflect those outlined in the commission brief.
Full details can be found within the scope document.
CPV: Research and development services and related consultancy services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · value publishedLot #1Published value£60,000
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Published sub-criteria (7)
- Quality - understanding of the brief and strategic challenge: 15%
- Quality - Strength and suitability of methodology: 15%
- Quality - Relevant experience and expertise: 15%
- Quality - Ability to deliver practical and actionable recommendations: 15%
- Quality - Quality and credibility of the proposed team: 15%
- Quality - Robustness of proposed apporach: 15%
- Sustainability - Describe how your organisation will minimise environmental impact and maximise social value in the delivery of this commission: 10%
Published award criteria (7)
- Quality - understanding of the brief and strategic challenge
- Quality - Strength and suitability of methodology
- Quality - Relevant experience and expertise
- Quality - Ability to deliver practical and actionable recommendations
- Quality - Quality and credibility of the proposed team
- Quality - Robustness of proposed apporach
- Sustainability - Describe how your organisation will minimise environmental impact and maximise social value in the delivery of this commission
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Open procedure
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Closed
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 10 Aug 2026, 16:39 BST
- Last source update
- 10 Aug 2026, 16:39 BST
- Award evaluation window
- Submission end – 6 Oct 2026
- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-075910- Latest notice
- Tender notice (UK4)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06e096Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- 11 Sept 2026, 12:00 BST
- Clarification deadline
- 21 Aug 2026, 12:00 BST
- Electronic submission
- Not allowed
- Accepted languages
- en
Timeline
10 Aug 2026 → 19 Oct 2026 · 5 dates- Tender notice published77 days ago10 Aug 2026, 16:39 BST
- Clarification questions by66 days ago21 Aug 2026, 12:00 BST
- Submission deadline45 days ago11 Sept 2026, 12:00 BST
- Award decision expected by20 days ago6 Oct 2026, 23:59 BST
- Contract starts8 days ago19 Oct 2026, 00:00 BST
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Tender notice published10 Aug 2026, 16:39 BSTUK4
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (3)
Official links; attachments are not copiedTender pack and attachments
Notices published for this procedure
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender