Find a TenderPlanned procurement
Published 5 Dec 2025, 10:17 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

PEACEPLUS Works Contractor for Reconnected Belfast Project at Waterworks and Alexandra Park

Authority: Belfast City Council (Local council)

Works
Planned pipeline value£10,700,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 16 Jan 2026from the planned procurement notice

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The Project focuses on re-generating Waterworks and Alexandra Park, the objective of the project is to increase cross-community integration through a transformed shared space in north Belfast, which will enable 33.18 hectares of parkland space to be upgraded and capable of facilitating participation of thousands of people from all communities. Improvements at Waterworks Park comprise the demolition of the existing Waterworks Bothy and replacement with a new building to include public toilets, Changing Places, multi-purpose community room and kitchenette, extension to existing Cavehill Road gatehouse building, entrance improvements, new events space including multipurpose decking, resurfacing of footways, new pedestrian lighting along key routes, a dog park, replacement platforms and viewing area, replacement surface to existing small sided 3G pitch, and upgrades to existing Queen Mary’s playground. Improvements at Alexandra Park include the resurfacing of footways, new pedestrian lighting along key routes, new reinforced grass event space, new lake viewing area, new public toilets and changing places, entrance improvements, 2no existing bridges replaced, new pedestrian entrance, new multi-sport synthetic surface with cover, and upgrades to existing play parks. Streetscape improvements along Camberwell Terrace and Castleton Gardens include resurfacing of footways with new kerbs; resurfaced carriageways and new tactile paving at pedestrian crossings; and all associated works. Additionally, works include refurbishment and safety works to the Waterworks upper and lower reservoirs, and Alexandra Park lake reservoir, to be complemented with wider environmental, landscape and connectivity improvements. The proposed reservoir works comprise of a new overflow structure with reinforcement and protection of the return embankment parallel to the bywash channel at Waterworks Upper reservoir, repairs to the upstream face of Waterworks Lower reservoir with the addition of wetland planting to reduce the overall capacity of the reservoir, and removal of an existing parapet wall and embankment reinforcement at the Alexandra Park Lake reservoir.

CPV: Construction work · Construction work of leisure facilities · Installation of street furniture · Landscaping work for green areas · Pedestrian zone construction work · Repair and maintenance work in connection with sports facilities · Reservoir construction works · Surface work for highways

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Belfast City Council buys Construction work (CPV 45), and who usually turns up

Belfast City Council’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Construction work (CPV 45) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerBelfast City Council · all categories
The marketConstruction work (CPV 45) · UK-wide
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 65 of 76 known-size awards · market: division 45 · UK-wide, n=4,649
86%73%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 83 of 97 known-location awards · market: division 45 · UK-wide, n=5,493
86%69%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 33 decided notices · market: division 45 · UK-wide, n=1,239
44 days44 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 44 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 27 of 72 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: division 45 · UK-wide, n=7,012
38%32%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer99 lots with bid counts · all categories
42% had one bid
The market1,741 lots with bid counts · division 45 · UK-wide
12% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid42% / 12%
Buyer: 42 of 99 lots with published bid counts. Market: 206 of 1,741 lots with published bid counts.
2–332% / 27%
Buyer: 32 of 99 lots with published bid counts. Market: 475 of 1,741 lots with published bid counts.
4–620% / 30%
Buyer: 20 of 99 lots with published bid counts. Market: 529 of 1,741 lots with published bid counts.
7+5% / 30%
Buyer: 5 of 99 lots with published bid counts. Market: 531 of 1,741 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer54 lots with estimate and award · all categories
15% below estimate
The market1,396 lots with estimate and award · division 45 · UK-wide
42% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate15% / 42%
Buyer: 8 of 54 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 592 of 1,396 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%69% / 30%
Buyer: 37 of 54 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 425 of 1,396 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate17% / 27%
Buyer: 9 of 54 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 379 of 1,396 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 45Published estimate£11m

This lot lists more than one class in CPV 45. The comparison uses that group.

Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 1,741 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet12% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 1,741 similar lots
1 bid12%
206 of 1,741 similar past lots received 1 bid (12%).
2–327%
475 of 1,741 similar past lots received 2–3 (27%).
4–630%
529 of 1,741 similar past lots received 4–6 (30%).
7+30%
531 of 1,741 similar past lots received 7+ (30%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £11m, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
Procurement category
Works
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Unspecified in notice
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Yes (GPA)
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
5 Dec 2025, 10:17 GMT
Last source update
5 Dec 2025, 10:17 GMT
FTS notice number
2025/S 000-080016
Classification (CPV)
Construction workConstruction work of leisure facilitiesInstallation of street furnitureLandscaping work for green areasPedestrian zone construction workRepair and maintenance work in connection with sports facilitiesReservoir construction worksSurface work for highways
Delivery area
UK
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-05ef60 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

5 Dec 2025 → 16 Jan 2026 · 2 dates
  1. Notice published327 days ago
    5 Dec 2025, 10:17 GMT
  2. Tender notice expected286 days ago
    16 Jan 2026

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Belfast City Council

Contracting authorityLocal CouncilRegional or local authorityGeneral public services 9-21 Adelaide Street, Belfast, UK, BT2 8DJContact email

Official documents & specifications

Official links; attachments are not copied

No document links were published on the notice.