Find a TenderPlanned procurement
Published 26 Jan 2026, 13:23 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

Particle Size and Shape Analyser

Authority: University Of Edinburgh (Education)

Goods
Planned pipeline valueValue not publishedpipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 2 Mar 2026from the planned procurement notice

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Instrument for particle size and shape characterisation of natural and industrial granular materials.

CPV: Laboratory, optical and precision equipments (excl. glasses)

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1Instrument for particle size and shape characterisation of natural and industrial…Planned

Instrument for particle size and shape characterisation of natural and industrial granular materials e.g.:

-Volcanic flow particles (ash, lapilli, pumice, scoria etc.) derived from pyroclastic density currents, fallout deposits, lahars and debris flows.

-Industrial particulate materials relevant to construction.

-Soils

-Construction materials (concretes, mortars, lightweight aggregates, composites)

-Agricultural amendments and granules (including Biochar)

-Polymer/composite additives

-Energy storage materials (electrodes, conductive carbons)

Materials will range from coarse granules to fine powders, typically irregular, porous, low-density and black.

Essential requirements (minimum)

Measurement capability

-Measures both particle size distribution and particle shape in one instrument or tightly integrated system.

-Image-based technique (e.g. dynamic image analysis or equivalent) suitable for irregular, opaque, carbonaceous particles.

-Provides at least:

-Size metrics: equivalent diameter, D10/D50/D90, full distribution.

-Shape metrics: aspect ratio, circularity/roundness, and at least one compactness/solidity/convexity parameter.

Size range and performance

-Usable size range:

-Lower limit ≤ 1μm

-Upper limit ≥ 5 mm

-Capable of analysing polydisperse samples in a single run.

-At least 50,000 particles analysed per standard measurement (for powders).

-Repeatability better than 3 % RSD on D10/D50/D90 for suitable reference materials.

Sample handling and dispersion

-Dry dispersion unit for low-density, porous, angular powders and granules:

-Controlled feed (e.g. vibratory feeder or equivalent).

-Adjustable dispersion energy/pressure.

-Wet dispersion capability:

-Recirculating wet cell for suspensions of soils, biochar and carbon powders.

-Compatibility with at least water and common alcohols (e.g. ethanol or isopropanol).

Shape analysis and classification

-Shape parameters computed for all measured particles or size classes.

-Ability to filter and analyse particles by size and/or shape (e.g. size range, aspect ratio range).

-Display and export of representative particle images for documentation and publications.

Software, data handling and reporting

-Method/SOP editor for storing and recalling measurement conditions.

-Export of size and shape data in standard formats (e.g. CSV, Excel).

-Overlay and comparison of multiple measurements.

-Configurable reports (number/area/volume distributions, cumulative and density plots, basic shape statistics).

Calibration and practical aspects

-Calibration/verification with traceable particle size standards in relevant ranges.

-Documented traceability to relevant particle sizing standards (ISO/ASTM or equivalent).

-Design suitable for dusty, abrasive, black powders, with straightforward cleaning of the dispersion path.

-Enclosed optics and standard laser/electrical safety compliance.

-Access to local service and technical support.

  1. Desirable (nice-to-have) features

Extended capabilities

-Integrated laser diffraction module (wet and/or dry) using the same dispersion units, providing sub-micron coverage (≈0.1 μm or lower).

-Dedicated fibre/rod analysis (length, width, L/W ratio) for fibrous chars/carbon fibres.

-Extended upper size limit to ≥ 10 mm for large granules and aggregates.

-Interchangeable optics/lenses to optimise measurements for fine powders vs coarse granules.

Advanced dispersion and handling

-Multiple dry disperser configurations (gentle and aggressive).

-Integrated anti-static measures (e.g. ioniser) for very fine, low-density powders.

-Low-volume wet cells (few mL) for expensive or low-yield materials.

-Integrated, controllable ultrasonic dispersion (power and time) with logging.

Automation and integration

-Optional autosampler for unattended measurement of multiple samples.

-API or scripting interface for method control and automated data extraction.

-Database/LIMS connectivity for long-term storage and retrieval of results.

Robustness

-Wear-resistant materials in nozzles and flow paths.

-Design that minimises cross-contamination.

Delivery: Scotland · University of Edinburgh

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How University Of Edinburgh buys Laboratory, optical and precision (CPV 38), and who usually turns up

University Of Edinburgh’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Laboratory, optical and precision (CPV 38) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerUniversity Of Edinburgh · division 38
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 11 of 25 known-size awards · market: division 38 · Scotland, n=91
44%56%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Here, local means registered in Scotland.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 1 of 12 known-location awards · market: division 38 · Scotland, n=44
8%20%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered outside Scotland.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: division 38 · UK-wide, n=101
—36 days

Half of these awards were announced within 36 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 26 of 37 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: division 38 · Scotland, n=113
70%51%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer43 lots with bid counts · all categories
9% had one bid
The market47 lots with bid counts · division 38 · Scotland
28% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid9% / 28%
Buyer: 4 of 43 lots with published bid counts. Market: 13 of 47 lots with published bid counts.
2–326% / 40%
Buyer: 11 of 43 lots with published bid counts. Market: 19 of 47 lots with published bid counts.
4–626% / 21%
Buyer: 11 of 43 lots with published bid counts. Market: 10 of 47 lots with published bid counts.
7+40% / 11%
Buyer: 17 of 43 lots with published bid counts. Market: 5 of 47 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer22 lots with estimate and award · all categories
23% below estimate
The market21 lots with estimate and award · division 38 · Scotland
81% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate23% / 81%
Buyer: 5 of 22 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 17 of 21 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%64% / 14%
Buyer: 14 of 22 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 3 of 21 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate14% / 5%
Buyer: 3 of 22 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 1 of 21 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1Instrument for particle size and shape characterisation of natural and industrial…Estimate not published
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 47 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet28% single-bid risk
Past bids on 47 similar lots
1 bid28%
13 of 47 similar past lots received 1 bid (28%).
2–340%
19 of 47 similar past lots received 2–3 (40%).
4–621%
10 of 47 similar past lots received 4–6 (21%).
7+11%
5 of 47 similar past lots received 7+ (11%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 2 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Estimate not published
The buyer published no estimate for this lot, so there is nothing to forecast against. A price prediction here would be a number about a number we do not have.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record · publisher note attached
Legal basis
CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
Procurement category
Goods
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Unspecified in notice
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Yes (GPA)
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
26 Jan 2026, 13:23 GMT
Last source update
26 Jan 2026, 13:23 GMT
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-006662
Classification (CPV)
Laboratory, optical and precision equipments (excl. glasses)
Delivery area
Scotland (UKM75)
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-060e8e Find a Tender

Publisher note: NOTE: To register your interest in this notice and obtain any additional information please visit the Public Contracts Scotland Web Site at https://www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/Search/Search_Switch.aspx?ID=821672. (SC Ref:821672)

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

26 Jan 2026 → 2 Mar 2026 · 2 dates
  1. Notice published269 days ago
    26 Jan 2026, 13:23 GMT
  2. Tender notice expected234 days ago
    2 Mar 2026

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

University Of Edinburgh

Contracting authorityEducationBody governed by public lawEducation Charles Stewart House, 9-16 Chambers Street, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH1 1HTContact email, phone

Official documents & specifications

Official links; attachments are not copied

No document links were published on the notice.