Official UK procurement notice
Obesity Surgery for Children and Young People - Market Engagement Exercise
Authority: NHS England (Central government)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionNHS Arden and Greater East Midlands Commissioning Support Unit (AGCSU), on behalf of<br/>NHS England Specialised Commissioning (referred to as the Commissioner), is undertaking<br/>a market engagement exercise to understand the current and future capacity, interest and<br/>capability of potential providers in relation to delivering Obesity Surgery for Children and Young People.<br/>This notice is to advise prospective providers in the market of the Commissioner's intention<br/>to commission this service and to provide an opportunity to engage with and participate in a<br/>market engagement exercise.<br/>The outcome of this market engagement exercise will provide Commissioners with the detail<br/>required to help inform the commissioning strategy.<br/>The deadline for completed market engagement questionnaires is 12pm (noon), Wednesday 15th April 2026.
CPV: Health services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1The key objective of the Market Engagement Exercise is to seek feedback from the…Planned
The key objective of the Market Engagement Exercise is to seek feedback from the market regarding levels of interest, capability and capacity in relation to delivering Obesity Surgery for Children and Young People.<br/><br/>Surgery for children and young people with obesity is not recommended (NICE Clinical Guideline 245, 2025) however, there are a small cohort of patients for whom metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is routinely commissioned in line with criteria set out in NHS England Clinical Commissioning policy 16053 Obesity surgery for children with severe complex obesity (www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2… ↗)<br/> <br/>In 2017, NHS England, as the responsible commissioner of Tier 4 weight management services, published a service specification for Specialised and complex obesity surgery for children which outlines the standards required of a Tier 4 service. The specification specified that patients will only be referred into Tier 4 services by Tier 3 specialist multidisciplinary weight management teams, except for where individuals have established Type 2 diabetes, where there were significant safeguarding concerns or where syndromic forms of obesity were felt likely. Variable commissioning arrangements for Tier 3 services (via Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs)) at that time meant that availability of Tier 3 services was highly limited and no referral pathways existed for children and young people to access surgery. <br/><br/>It is acknowledged that future access to CEW clinics is likely to be dependent upon local priorities at ICB level. NHS England has revised the service specification to reflect the potential for differences in commissioning arrangements for those services responsible for referral into obesity surgery services and ensure that referral into surgical service can be made equitably for all eligible patients.<br/><br/>Although commissioning responsibility for obesity surgery services for children and young people has been delegated to ICBs, the low volume of surgical activity anticipated annually means that NHS England are leading this market engagement exercise to determine next steps. The service specification, originally published in 2017, has been revised to reflect current service arrangements and the revised draft is included in the market engagement documents for any feedback from providers undertaking obesity surgery at present or any providers who wish to express an interest in providing this service in the future.<br/>Following market engagement and review of capable providers, the Commissioner will consider the most appropriate PSR process to formally commission this service. <br/><br/>Interested parties may respond to this Market Engagement Exercise in partnership with other organisations as part of a consortium, subject to them appointing a consortium lead to act on their behalf as the lead contracting party would take overall responsibility for delivery of the service(s) in accordance with the requirements of any future contract(s) if successful. <br/><br/>The questionnaire explores provider capability across five key domains:<br/>
- Quality & Innovation<br/>
- Value<br/>
- Integration & Sustainability<br/>
- Access & Health Inequalities<br/>
- Social Value<br/><br/>Documentation relating to this exercise including a questionnaire for completion is available through the Atamis (Health Family) portal. <br/><br/>To register your interest and access the questionnaire, please follow this link: atamis-1928.my.site.com/s/Welcome ↗<br/><br/>The project reference is C426286 and the closing date for submission of the completed questionnaire is 12pm (noon) on 12pm, noon, on Wednesday 15th April 2026
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How NHS England buys Health services (CPV 8510), and who usually turns up
NHS England’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Health services (CPV 8510) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 24 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid26% / 24%
2–341% / 33%
4–616% / 26%
7+17% / 17%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate37% / 36%
Within ±2%51% / 58%
Above estimate11% / 6%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1The key objective of the Market Engagement Exercise is to seek feedback from the…CPV 8510Estimate not published
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 488 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid24%
2–333%
4–626%
7+17%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 16 Mar 2026, 10:44 GMT
- Last source update
- 16 Mar 2026, 10:44 GMT
- Authority reference
C426286- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-023371- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-066ab9Find a Tender
How it was run
Official noticeTender documents are also served through a separate tool: https://atamis-1928.my.site.com/s/Welcome ↗
- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
16 Mar 2026 → 30 Jun 2026 · 2 dates- Notice published222 days ago16 Mar 2026, 10:44 GMT
- Tender notice expected116 days ago30 Jun 2026, 00:00 BST
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications
Official links; attachments are not copiedNo document links were published on the notice.