Official UK procurement notice
NLP Condition Survey Programme
Authority: North Lanarkshire Council (Local council)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionNorth Lanarkshire Properties (NLP) has a requirement to update its asset management register in respect of the condition of its property estate to ensure compliance with its statutory and legal obligations and to inform a multiyear investment strategy. The resulting dataset will form the foundation of NLP's future asset management, lifecycle investment, maintenance planning and portfolio optimisation activities. NLP manages a portfolio of approximately 990 assets. The current condition survey programme is anticipated to cover approximately 672 operational property assets, excluding ground lease assets and other property categories outside the scope of this procurement. Information is required on the following split:
- 4 Business Centres
- 28 Offices
- 233 Retail
- 402 Industrial
- 5 Miscellaneous
- 672 Total
The procurement is for the appointment of suitably qualified and experienced building surveyor (a “Contractor”) to carry out condition surveys across a number of properties within the NLP portfolio.
The aim of the resulting Agreement is to obtain by means of visual inspection consistent, accurate and actionable information regarding the physical condition, statutory compliance, risks, and investment needs of the defined buildings within the estate. Applying the findings to inform a data driven investment strategy to maximise portfolio value. The objectives are to:
- Establish the current physical condition of each property asset defined.
- Identify defects, risks, and compliance issues.
- Provide an assessment of each asset’s life.
- Provide prioritised maintenance actions. Year 1-5 with year 1 being the faults in most urgent need of attention.
- Provide costs as a basis for estimating and to identify the level of funding required for future capital and revenue expenditure.
- Provide sufficient information to allow a maintenance programme to be developed over a planned period that will support operational planning and asset management decision making
- Deliver the condition survey in accordance with the following mandatory professional standards:
a. RICS Building Surveying Standards & Guidance
b. RICS Surveying Safely
c. RICS New Rules of Measurement (NRM) for cost estimation
d. PFI Asset Condition Playbook (2025) – survey methodology and reporting guidance
e. General Implementation Guidance (2025) for asset condition hand back surveys
f. Centre of Best Practice (CoBP) specification (where applicable)
The purpose of the commission is to provide portfolio-wide condition intelligence to support NLP asset management and investment decisions through Level 1 visual, non-intrusive surveys.
CPV: Building surveying services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · value publishedLot #1Geographical programme approach to be taken commencing with largest area; undertaking…RenewalPublished value£697,590
Geographical programme approach to be taken commencing with largest area; undertaking site visits to each property asset included in the programme (exc ground lease assets) as per tender documentation.
Elements in scope
- Contractor to deliver Condition Survey Level 1 visual non-intrusive inspections including review of available compliance documentation and identification of visible compliance concerns across external, internal, M&E elements, plus compliance observations.
- ID issues that relate to building energy performance and carbon emissions e.g. visible inefficiencies, highlighting old/inefficient systems, flagging fabric defects and heat loss risks.
- Undertake site visits, during normal opening hours, to each property asset included in the programme.
Conduct non-destructive inspection unless otherwise specified including:
- External visual assessment of accessible structure/fabric of each elevation/roof area, each identified building.
- Internal visual inspection of the accessible structure/fabric/roof void each identified building.
- Separate visual assessment/report of, boundary walls, fences and gates within the curtilage.
- Collect data using standardised survey template agreed in advance, using digital technology for this process in order for data to be entered straight into Confirm asset management system.
Capture photographic evidence of defects and key building features with supporting narrative logged in comments and recommendations.
- Assess each building element against grading structure to provide Core Facts summary as agreed in advance.
- Condition Grade A–D
- Priority 1–4 (e.g., Immediate / Year 1 / Years 2–5 / Years 6–10)
- Cost estimates to be provided to support capital planning and investment, maintenance prioritisation, lifecycle investment modelling using market rates and clear assumptions.
- The key deliverables are asset-level reports in electronic format and portfolio-level summaries including PDFs, excel datasets, optional GIS-compatible formats.
- Contractor to provide mobilisation plan and schedule for agreement, access coordination, reporting, and quality assurance processes.
- Reporting format and frequency/review set up-monthly meetings to ensure quality and that programme outputs can be used meaningfully, concerns can be raised and swiftly addressed.
- Access arrangements will be provided listing contact details for premises to be approached to agree access.
If any problems gaining access, details provided of individuals who are able to assist.
As some buildings will be in use during normal working hours all staff of Contractor must carry or wear ID.
- Contractor required to demonstrate compliance with relevant legislation and guidance, with qualified professionals delivering the work.
- Staff of Contractor must have competence aligned to RICS professional standards.
- Survey methodology must follow PFI Asset Condition Playbook principles of standardised inspection and reporting.
- H&S policies and procedures adhered to incl. and not limited to RAMS, urgent defect reporting, adherence to site safety requirements which is mandatory.
---------------
Elements out of scope
- Ground lease assets not required as NLP has no responsibility for building/structures on the land and no statutory obligation or operational requirement to survey these.
- Specialist investigations, intrusive inspections, testing, certification, structural assessments, and specialist mechanical and electrical surveys are excluded from the core commission. Where the condition survey identifies concerns requiring further investigation, the Contractor shall record appropriate recommendations. Any specialist services will only be undertaken where separately instructed by NLP under the Agreement.
- Concealed areas / areas below ground / below ground drainage are excluded.
Soft landscaping excluded.
Consultant not asked to provide a ‘valuation’ of the building/site.
Compliance checks with Disability Discrimination Act and Asbestos Management are excluded Additional information: Economic operators may be excluded from this competition if they are in any of the situations referred to in regulation 58 of the Public Contracts (Scotland) Regulations 2015.
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Published award criteria (2)
- Quality: 60
- Price: 40
No conditions of participation were published on the notice; check the tender documents.
- Price carries 40 of 100 points: a 10% discount moves about 4 points. The method statement decides this lot, not the discount.
- Turnover usually expected at this size: about £1,395,180 (twice the annual value).
Price arithmetic assumes straight proportional scoring; the tender pack may use another formula. Turnover is an indicative market norm (≈2× annual value), not a published condition.
Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid
How North Lanarkshire Council buys Consultative engineering and construction services (CPV 7131), and who usually turns up
North Lanarkshire Council’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Consultative engineering and construction services (CPV 7131) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means registered in Scotland.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners are registered in Scotland.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 48 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Missing bid counts may hide more single-bid awards. This share is a minimum.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid15% / 5%
2–335% / 29%
4–631% / 37%
7+19% / 29%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate17% / 61%
Within ±2%83% / 26%
Above estimate0% / 13%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1Geographical programme approach to be taken commencing with largest area; undertaking…CPV 7131Published estimate£698k
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid4%
2–324%
4–642%
7+30%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
Based on 46 comparable awards. Each lot reflects its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Middle 50%£667k–£698k
Estimate£698k
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
WSP UK LimitedLarge | £487m117 awards in 36m · last this month | 43 live · £410m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=18 |
AtkinsRéalis UK LtdLarge | £139m94 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 31 live · £189m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | at estimate n=15 |
Mott MacDonaldLarge | £73m86 awards in 36m · last this month | 16 live · £41m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 9% below n=20 |
| £6.2m26 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 2 live · £44k iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | 29% below n=5 | |
Stantec UK LimitedLarge | £1.3m34 awards in 36m · last 1 months ago | 10 live · £42m iPublic contracts this supplier still holds. Its awards whose published end date is still in the future, with their values. Many contracts publish no end date, so this is a floor, not the whole book. Unexpired says nothing about spare capacity. | no comparable pairs |
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record · publisher note attached- Procedure method
- Open procedure
- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Open for tender
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Yes (GPA)
- Recurring procurement
- No (one-off requirement)
- First published
- 26 Aug 2026, 09:24 BST
- Last source update
- 11 Sept 2026, 15:38 BST
- Award evaluation window
- 23 Oct 2026 – …
- Authority reference
NLC-CPT-25-160- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-086567- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-06ec05Find a Tender
- Electronic trading
- e-invoicing allowed · electronic ordering · electronic payment
- Performance terms
Further information is contained within the tender document suite and can be downloaded from the additional documentation area within the PCS-T portal.
Publisher note: Suppliers should note that consistency of survey methodology, quality assurance processes and calibration arrangements between surveyors will be a key consideration within the future procurement. The buyer is using PCS-Tender to conduct this ITT exercise. The Project code is 32677. For more information see: http://www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/info/InfoCentre.aspx?ID=2343 A sub-contract clause has been included in this contract. For more information see: http://www.publiccontractsscotland.gov.uk/info/InfoCentre.aspx?ID=2363 Community benefits are included in this requirement. For more information see: https://www.gov.scot/policies/public-sector-procurement/community-benefits-in-procurement/ A summary of the expected community benefits has been provided as follows: Bidders should refer to the requirements stated within PCS-Tender. (SC Ref:841990)
How to participate & submission route
Official notice Submit via Public Contracts Scotland- Requests to participate (first stage)
- —
- Tender submission deadline
- 23 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
- Clarification deadline
- —
- Submission channel
- {"electronicSubmission"}
- Accepted languages
- en
- Bid validity
- 150 days from the deadline
- Bids opened
- 23 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
Timeline
11 Sept 2026 → 23 Oct 2026 · 4 dates- Next notice expected41 days ago11 Sept 2026, 00:00 BST
- Notice published40 days ago11 Sept 2026, 15:38 BST
- Today21 Oct 2026
- Submission deadlinein 2 days23 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
- Bids openedin 2 days23 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
Notice history
4 events · 2 releases on Find a Tender · since 11 Sept 2026- Published value updated to £697,59011 Sept 2026, 15:38 BSTwas £675,000
- Status changed to active11 Sept 2026, 15:38 BST
- Procurement method changed11 Sept 2026, 15:38 BST
- Deadline published: 23 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST11 Sept 2026, 15:38 BST
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Nothing awarded yet- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Dispute resolution & review bodies
- Scottish CourtsReview body
Official documents & specifications (2)
Official links; attachments are not copiedTender pack and attachments
- Economic and financial selection criteria
- Technical selection criteria