Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 25 Nov 2025, 14:05 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

National Paediatric Critical Care Audit

Authority: Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (Public body)

ServicesAbove threshold
Sectors: Health & Social Care (85) Delivery: UK
Planned pipeline value£1,080,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 6 Apr 2026from the planned procurement notice
Contract term 3 yrsends 1 Apr 2030 · up to 31 Mar 2032 with extensions · starts 1 Apr 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The contract is expected to initially be delivered for NHS-funded care in England, for a period of 3 years, at a maximum total budget of up to £1,296,000 including VAT and £1,080,000 GBP excluding VAT. Bids exceeding this limit will be rejected. There is potential to extend the contract for up to two additional years as well as the option to include other Devolved Nations and/or Crown Dependencies, and aspirational measures (which will be defined in the service specification).

The maximum budget ‘core’ value is £1,296,000 including VAT and £1,080,000 GBP excluding VAT. This excludes the potential two year extension and aspirational intent which will be included in the service specification at point of tender, meaning the ceiling value has the potential to be higher.

There is also the potential that an audit of level 2 paediatric critical care services will form part of the specification, or be varied in at a later date via a funded aspirational intent mechanism. The above funding is excluding this workstream; however, potential bidders are to keep in mind this potential.

The role of a national clinical audit is to stimulate healthcare improvement through the provision of high quality information on the organisation, delivery and outcomes of healthcare, together with tools and support to enable healthcare providers and other audiences to make best use of this information. Outcomes are benchmarked against national guidance and standards e.g. quality standards from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and those from other established professional and patient sources. Successful national audits are those where the individuals providing the data are also in a position to improve the system, and there is a shared understanding of what good care looks like.

The National Paediatric Critical Care Audit (referred to as NPCCA for remainder of this document for brevity), was established in 2001 with the aim of providing a secure and confidential high quality clinical database of paediatric critical care activity. It is now part of the National Clinical Audit and Patient Outcomes Programme (NCAPOP) and is recognised as the definitive source for paediatric critical care data in England. NPCCA collects data from NHS Paediatric Critical Care (PCC) providing paediatric Level 3 Critical Care and Specialist Paediatric Critical Care Transport Services. There are on average around 20,000 new admissions per year. NPCCA audits the quality of care delivered against the Paediatric Critical Care Society (PCCS) standards and key quality metrics adopted by the Care Quality Commission (CQC), which cover the whole patient pathway from the initial referral to paediatric critical care, specialist transport and then inpatient care.

The overarching aim is to stimulate improvements in care for patients by measuring variations in quality, experience and outcomes. During this contract period, the successful tenderer will need to build on the achievements of the audit to date and enhance the ability for the audit to be used for healthcare improvement. Data is most useful locally for healthcare improvement when its provision to clinical teams is timely, the data is refreshed regularly and appropriate tools, support and guidance accompany the data outputs. The intent is for all of these features of the audit to be implemented and improved during the period of this contract.

The audit supplier will work with commissioners, funders, specialised commissioning and operational delivery networks (ODNs) to create a coherent strategy for how the improvement goals will be achieved. By way of example, the current contract specification includes these goals

•Reduce:

oThe risk of dying

oUnplanned extubation rates

oSpecialist PCC transport service refusals for urgent transfer

oThe number of children transferred to a unit more than two hours (travel by road) away

oThe central line infection rate

oThe length of stay for children with complex medical needs

oThe number of unnecessary cardiac surgery admissions to PCC level 3

oEmergency readmission rates

•Increase the proportion of parents and families who have excellent care experiences (with a baseline measure)

This audit programme is expected to:

a)Develop a robust, high quality audit designed around key quality indicators likely to best support local and national quality improvement;

b)Achieve, articulate and maintain close alignment with relevant NICE national guidance and quality standards throughout the audit, as appropriate;

c)Enable improvements through the provision of timely, high quality data that compares providers of healthcare, and comprises an integrated mixture of named Trust, commissioner, MDT, possibly consultant or clinical team level and other levels of reporting;

d)Engage parents, carers and families in a meaningful way, achieving a strong patient voice which informs and contributes to the design, functioning, outputs and direction of the audit;

e)Consider the value and feasibility of additional data linkage, at an individual patient level, to other relevant national datasets either from the outset or in the future, and plan for these linkages from the inception of the contract;

f)Ensure robust methodological and statistical input at all stages of the audit;

g)Identify from the outset the full range of audiences for the results and other audit outputs, and plan and tailor them accordingly;

h)Provide audit results in a timely, accessible and meaningful manner to support quality improvements, minimising the reporting delay and providing continual access to each unit for their own data;

i)Utilise strong and effective project and programme management to deliver audit outputs on time and within budget; and

j)Develop and maintain strong engagement with local clinicians, networks, commissioners, patients and their families and carers and charity and community support groups in order to drive improvements in services.

Further details of the existing audit can be found at: www.picanet.org.uk ↗

For more information about this opportunity, please visit the Delta eSourcing portal at:

www.delta-esourcing.com/tenders/UK-UK-London… ↗

To respond to this opportunity, please click here:

www.delta-esourcing.com/respond/555BG3NZH4 ↗

CPV: Health services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1PlannedRenewal 3 yrs
Contract period: 1 Apr 2027 – 1 Apr 2030 (3 yrs) · up to 31 Mar 2032 with extensions
Delivery: UK
Extensions: Extension options published

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership buys Health services (CPV 8510), and who usually turns up

Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership’s own published record, next to the published market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Health services (CPV 8510) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bidWhat to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 0 of 6 known-size awards · market: no supplier sizes published
0%—

No small-firm winners recorded among this authority’s published awards in this sample.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no winner locations published · market: no winner locations published
——

No winner locations published for this authority. Local means a registered address in the delivery region.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 5 decided notices · market: no decision dates published
81 days—

Half of these awards were announced within 81 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: exactly 6 of 6 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: no bid counts or routes published
100%—

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer5 lots with bid counts · broad CPV 85
100% had one bid
The marketNo bid counts published
Buyer · select a colour for counts
1 bid100%
Buyer: 5 of 5 lots with published bid counts.
2–30%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts.
4–60%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts.
7+0%
Buyer: 0 of 5 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer3 lots with estimate and award · broad CPV 85 · too few to chart
The marketNo estimate-and-award pairs published
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 851036 monthsPublished estimate£1.1m
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 487 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet24% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 487 similar lots
1 bid24%
119 of 487 similar past lots received 1 bid (24%).
2–332%
158 of 487 similar past lots received 2–3 (32%).
4–626%
127 of 487 similar past lots received 4–6 (26%).
7+17%
83 of 487 similar past lots received 7+ (17%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 3 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £1.1m, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
25 Nov 2025, 14:05 GMT
Last source update
25 Nov 2025, 14:05 GMT
FTS notice number
2025/S 000-076890
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
Health services
Delivery area
UK
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-05e869 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

25 Nov 2025 → 1 Apr 2027 · 4 dates
  1. Planning notice published331 days ago
    25 Nov 2025, 14:05 GMT
  2. Market engagement303 days ago
    23 Dec 2025, 23:59 GMT

    Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP) is seeking to engage with the market on the recommissioning of the National Paediatric Critical Care Audit (PICANet).

    The Authority is looking to build on the successes of the existing audit currently contracted with the University of Leeds.

    Further information as well as details of the current audit can be found at: www.picanet.org.uk ↗

    HQIP will be holding a pre-market engagement session with potential suppliers on Wednesday 7th January 2026 2.00pm-3.45pm.

    Also in attendance will be system partners and service specialists including charities.

    The aim of the pre market engagement session is for interested parties to hear and contribute to discussions with system experts and patient groups that will feed in to HQIP’s final decisions on the scope of the audit during this next contract period, and the anticipated outcomes over the 3-5 years of the audit.

    The existing specification is available for review by any interested parties and whilst it will provide information on how the current audit was scoped, it is important to understand that the recommissioning of this audit may amend the requirements.

    At this point, the Authority is planning to run this procurement under an open tender.

    The proposed dates (subject to change solely at the Authorities discretion) are as follows:

    •7th January 2026 - Pre Market Engagement Session

    •Publication of tender opportunity – April 2026

    •Evaluation of submitted bids – May - June 2026

    •Award – September 2026

    •Contract start - 1st April 2027

    Whilst the Authority intends to stick to the timeline, it may deviate away from it at any time.

    The expected value of the contract will be subject to increase under aspirational intent measures which will be defined in the service specification at point of tender. There is also a potential that an audit of level 2 paediatric critical care services will be a funded inclusion either at point of tender, or a potential under aspirational intent.

    The authority cannot commit to this work at this stage, but it may become a requirement between the premarket engagement event and the tender opportunity going live.

    The aspirational intent will cover the value range and mechanisms for invoking each element of it.

    If you would like to join this premarket engagement event, please email [email protected] stating your name, position and organisation by close of business Tuesday 23rd December 2025 with 'Paediatric Critical Care Pre Market Engagement Event' as the subject line.

    The Authority is publishing this notice a month in advance of the holiday period, to account for the break, and would encourage early expressions of interest to participate.

    You may also use this opportunity to request a copy of the existing project specification.

  3. Tender notice expected199 days ago
    6 Apr 2026, 23:59 BST
  4. Today
    22 Oct 2026
  5. Contract startsin 160 days
    1 Apr 2027, 00:00 BST

Notice history

1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender
  1. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    25 Nov 2025, 14:05 GMT
    UK2

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership Ltd

Contracting authorityPublic authority - sub-central government GB-PPON: PVVQ-6113-CJWD 128 City Road, London, London, EC1V 2NXContact email, phone

Official documents & specifications (1)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure