Find a TenderPlanned procurementPreliminary market engagement notice
Published 13 May 2026, 15:19 BST

Official UK procurement notice

Maternity EPR System · UK public procurement notice

Authority: Calderdale and Huddersfield Solutions Limited (Central government)

ServicesOpen procedureAbove thresholdSME suitable
Sectors: Software Packages & ERP (48)IT Services & Software (72) Delivery: Delivery location not published
Planned pipeline value£500,000pipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 29 Jun 2026from the planned procurement notice
Contract term 3 yrsends 15 Jun 2030 · up to 15 Jun 2032 with extensions · starts 16 Jun 2027

What is being bought

Published requirement description

Complete Maternity EPR system

CPV: IT software package · Software package and information systems · Software supply services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · value published
Lot #1PlannedRenewal 3 yrsSMEPublished value£500,000
Contract period: 16 Jun 2027 – 15 Jun 2030 (3 yrs) · up to 15 Jun 2032 with extensionsValue: £500,000 exc. VAT · £600,000 inc. VAT
Eligibility: SME eligible
Extensions: 2 x 12 months

Who is likely to bid for this lot ↓

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Calderdale and Huddersfield Solutions Limited buys Communication software package (CPV 4851), and who usually turns up

Calderdale and Huddersfield Solutions Limited’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Communication software package (CPV 4851) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bidWhat to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 2 of 5 known-size awards · market: CPV 4851 · Yorkshire and the Humber (authority’s region), n=16
40%19%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in Yorkshire and the Humber (authority’s region).

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 3 of 9 known-location awards · market: CPV 4851 · Yorkshire and the Humber (authority’s region), n=11
33%27%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered outside the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: no decision dates published · market: CPV 4851 · UK-wide, n=6
—88 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 88 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 8 of 10 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: CPV 4851 · Yorkshire and the Humber (authority’s region), n=19
80%68%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyerToo few to chart: 2 lots with bid counts, 5 needed · all categories
The market8 lots with bid counts · CPV 4851 · UK-wide
25% had one bid
Market · select a colour for counts
1 bid25%
Market: 2 of 8 lots with published bid counts.
2–30%
Market: 0 of 8 lots with published bid counts.
4–625%
Market: 2 of 8 lots with published bid counts.
7+50%
Market: 4 of 8 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyerToo few to chart: 1 lot with estimate and award, 5 needed · all categories
The market5 lots with estimate and award · CPV 4851 · UK-wide
80% below estimate
Market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate80%
Market: 4 of 5 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%20%
Market: 1 of 5 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate0%
Market: 0 of 5 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1CPV 485136 monthsSME suitablePublished estimate£500k
Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 35 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet11% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 35 similar lots
1 bid11%
4 of 35 similar past lots received 1 bid (11%).
2–329%
10 of 35 similar past lots received 2–3 (29%).
4–634%
12 of 35 similar past lots received 4–6 (34%).
7+26%
9 of 35 similar past lots received 7+ (26%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 4 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—No model forecast yet
No comparable awards on record for this lot’s category yet. The published estimate is £500k, and the forecast stays empty until the market has a record to read.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Procedure method
Open procedure
Legal basis
UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Above threshold (FTS publication)
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Unspecified in notice
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
13 May 2026, 15:19 BST
Last source update
14 May 2026, 15:36 BST
Award evaluation window
Submission end – 27 Aug 2026
FTS notice number
2026/S 000-044492
Latest notice
Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
Classification (CPV)
IT software packageSoftware package and information systemsSoftware supply services
Delivery area
Not published
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0697f6 Find a Tender
Contract terms summary

30 days

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
27 Jul 2026, 12:00 BST
Accepted languages
en

Timeline

13 May 2026 → 16 Jun 2027 · 7 dates
  1. Planning notice published163 days ago
    13 May 2026, 15:19 BST
  2. Latest notice published162 days ago
    14 May 2026, 15:36 BST
  3. Market engagement143 days ago
    1 Jun 2026, 23:59 BST

    Request for Information (RFI) – Maternity Electronic Patient Record (EPR)

    Early Market Engagement / Soft Market Testing (non‑binding)

    Contracting Authority: Calderdale & Huddersfield Solutions Ltd on behalf of CHFT

    Procurement Reference: C447217

    RFI Issue Date: 14/05/2026

    Response Deadline: 1/06/2026, 12:00 (UK time)

    Contact for queries: [email protected]

    Purpose:

    This Request for Information (RFI) is intended to support early market engagement to inform future specification development for a Maternity Electronic Patient Record (EPR) for CHFT and community midwifery.

    This RFI is not a procurement exercise and does not constitute a commitment to procure.

    Participation is optional and responses will not be scored or used to down‑select suppliers at this stage.

    1. Supplier Overview

    Please provide a brief overview of:

    • Your organisation and maternity EPR offering - product name/version
    • Experience delivering maternity EPR solutions within the NHS
    • Current or recent NHS maternity customers (if applicable)
    • High-level product roadmap relevant to maternity services
    1. Clinical Scope (High Level)

    Please confirm whether your solution supports the following areas of the maternity pathway (Yes / Partial / Planned), with brief commentary:

    • Antenatal care (including booking, risk assessment, care planning)
    • Intrapartum care (labour and birth documentation)
    • Postnatal care (including discharge and follow-up)
    1. Alignment with National Maternity Standards
    • Please outline your level of alignment with current national standards, including:
    • Digital Maternity Record Standard (DAPB3066)
    • PRSB maternity record headings
    • Use of SNOMED CT and NHS Number
    1. Interoperability / Integration

    Please describe, at a high level:

    • Interoperability approach (e.g. FHIR / APIs)
    • Ability to integrate with a core EPR / PAS and shared care records – key requirement
    • Approach to data sharing across organisational boundaries
    • Provide workflow diagram that outlines the technical integration and inbound connectivity with the Trust’s systems.
    1. Clinical Safety and Assurance

    Please confirm:

    • Compliance with DCB0129 and support for DCB0160
    • Availability of a Clinical Safety Case and Hazard Log
    1. Reporting and Data Use (High Level)

    Please provide a summary of:

    • Reporting and audit capabilities for maternity services
    • Support for quality, safety and service improvement reporting
    1. Implementation Considerations

    At a high level, please outline:

    • Typical implementation approach and timeline
    • Experience migrating from existing maternity systems
    1. Indicative Commercial Model

    For indicative purposes only, please provide details of:

    • Licensing / charging model
    • Expected implementation costs
    • Expected recurrent costs typically associated with your solution – hosting, maintenance, etc
    • Any common commercial assumptions that influence pricing (e.g. activity levels, number of sites, deployment model)
    • Typical contract length and how that influences pricing

    Costs may be provided as:

    • Typical ranges; or
    • An example based on a recent implementation

    Please clearly state any assumptions used.

    1. Hardware Model

    Please describe the hardware model required to deploy and operate your maternity EPR solution in clinical and community settings, including:

    • Whether specialist hardware (e.g. portals / clinical panel PCs) is required or recommended
    • Whether hardware is supplied directly by your organisation, via third‑party partners, or expected to be procured by the Trust
    • Any typical assumptions regarding device numbers, locations or configurations

    Where specialist or recommended hardware is required, please indicate:

    • Typical capital cost ranges (where known)
    • Whether ongoing support, warranty or replacement costs are included or additional
    • Any known dependencies on specific third‑party suppliers
    1. Additional Comments

    Please add any additional information you believe would be helpful in informing future specification development or understanding the maternity EPR market.

    Declaration:

    The information provided is accurate to the best of our knowledge and provided for market engagement purposes only.

  4. Tender notice expected115 days ago
    29 Jun 2026, 23:59 BST
  5. Submission deadline88 days ago
    27 Jul 2026, 12:00 BST
  6. Award decision expected by56 days ago
    27 Aug 2026, 23:59 BST
  7. Today
    23 Oct 2026
  8. Contract startsin 236 days
    16 Jun 2027, 00:00 BST

Notice history

4 events · 4 releases on Find a Tender · since 13 May 2026
  1. Planned procurement notice published
    13 May 2026, 15:19 BST
    UK3
  2. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    13 May 2026, 15:40 BST
    UK2
  3. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    13 May 2026, 15:51 BST
    UK2
  4. Preliminary market engagement notice published
    14 May 2026, 15:36 BST
    UK2
Published amendments (2)

To add FOI document

Change the Engagement deadline date

Routine re-releases (4)
  • 2026-05: 1 release · 13 May 2026

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Calderdale and Huddersfield Solutions Limited

Contracting authorityPublic authority - central government GB-PPON: PHPR-3762-LPLP Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Lindley, Huddersfield, Yorkshire & Humber, HD3 3EAContact email

Official documents & specifications (4)

Official links; attachments are not copied

Notices published for this procedure