Official UK procurement notice
Lux Mundi Catholic Academy Trust - Lettings Tender
Authority: Lux Mundi Catholic Academy Trust (Public body)·On behalf of: RIVA Partnership Ltd
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionLux Mundi Catholic Academy Trust proudly welcomes individuals of all faiths and none within our schools, ensuring everyone feels valued and included in our diverse community. Our commitment to inclusivity and community is at the heart of everything we do, guided by the principles of Catholic Social Teaching.
At Lux Mundi Catholic Academy Trust, we believe that a strong sense of community is essential for personal and academic growth. By working together and supporting one another, we create a nurturing environment where everyone can shine and achieve their full potential.
Further information regarding the Trust can be obtained here: https://luxmundi.co.uk/
Tender information:
The successful tenderer will be required to provide an efficient and effective fully managed letting services for Lux Mundi Catholic Academy Trust, which comprises the below 10 schools, all of which are participating in this tender:
Hackney Schools
•Cardinal Pole – secondary
•St Monica's –primary
Tower Hamlets Schools
•Bishop Challoner - secondary
•St Anne's and Guardian and Guardian Angels - primary
•St Elizabeth - primary
Haringey Schools
•St Mary's Priory – primary
•St Francis de Sales - primary
•St Ignatius - primary
Haringey Schools (joining soon)
•Our Lady of Muswell - primary (joining Nov 2026)
•St John Vianney - primary (joining Nov 2026)
The contract term being tendered is for three years, 1st April 2027 – 31st March 2029. There is an option for a further extension period for up to two additional years to 31st March 2031.
Please note that the contract for St Monica’s will commence 1st Sept 2028 to 31st March 2029 with option for a further extension period for up to two additional years to 31st March 2031.
The contract offers an excellent opportunity to review and propose enhancements to the current letting services at the trust.
The trust seeks to increase income streams and ensure the commercial viability of lettings by maximising all assets and actively promoting all facilities. A consistent, professional approach to lettings management is required, aiming to increase income, maintain and enhance the trust’s reputation, deliver a positive social impact, strengthen community engagement and potentially to attract new pupils.
The trust is not obliged to accept the best financial offer submitted for this tender, rather the trust is keen to secure best value. Creative ideas as to how the lettings activity can be developed, improved and maximised, will be welcomed. The trust seeks a contractor that is keen to work in partnership with them and who will deliver to its highest abilities, at all times.
Competitive Flexible Procedure
This procurement will be run under the Competitive Flexible Procedure. This will follow a two stage approach, with stage 1 being the Procurement Specific Questionnaire (PSQ). Here a minimum of 5 candidates (or less, in the event less than 5 meet the minimum criteria) and a maximum of 10 candidates, will progress to stage 2. Any selection of tenderers will be based solely on the criteria set out for the procurement and a minimum score of 60% must be achieved.
Selected tenderers will then be invited to stage 2, the Invitation To Tender (ITT). Here, the evaluation of tender response will be set as 50% price and 50% quality.
Value of contract:
The annual value of the current contract is £780,000
Therefore the value of this contract is £3,900,000 – it is noted that the contract value is an estimate and that we very much expect lettings revenue to be maximised at all school at all times, as a result of this tender.
Additional requirements and information:
•The trust has a minimum requirement for a contractor’s employers' liability and public liability insurances of £10 million
•The minimum annual turnover that your company must have achieved to be considered for this opportunity is £1 million
•The lettings services are currently run in house aside from St Monica’s where Schools Space manages this contract
•There are not incumbent staff eligible for TUPE under this contract
•There are not incumbent staff currently within the Local Government Pension Scheme
•Please note this is a growing Trust and any other schools that may join the Trust during the tenure of this new lettings contract may, at the Trust’s discretion, be added to this contract.
•The client reserves the right not to appoint in conclusion of this project.
For more information about this opportunity, please visit the eSourcing portal at:
https://www.delta-esourcing.com/tenders/UK-UK-London:-Non-residential-property-renting-or-leasing-services./43PG556H28
To respond to this opportunity, please click here:
https://www.delta-esourcing.com/respond/43PG556H28
- How the procedure runs: This procurement will be run under the Competitive Flexible Procedure. This will follow a two stage approach, with stage 1 being the Procurement Specific Questionnaire (PSQ). Here a minimum of 5 candidates (or less, in the event less than 5 meet the minimum criteria) and a maximum of 10 candidates, will progress to stage 2. Any selection of tenderers will be based solely on the criteria set out for the procurement and a minimum score of 60% must be achieved. Selected tenderers will then be invited to stage 2, the Invitation To Tender (ITT). Here, the evaluation of tender response will be set as 50% price and 50% quality.
CPV: Non-residential property renting or leasing services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · value publishedLot #1RenewalPublished value£3,900,000
- Value
- £3,900,000 exc. VAT · £4,680,000 inc. VAT
- Extensions
- There is an option for a further extension period for up to two additional years to 31st March 2031
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published — the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Published award criteria (2)
- Quality
- Price
No conditions of participation were published on the notice; check the tender documents.
- Price carries 50 of 100 points — a 10% discount moves about 5 points. This one is won on the number — sharpen the price before polishing the prose.
- Turnover usually expected at this size: about £3,894,665 (twice the annual value).
Price arithmetic assumes straight proportional scoring — the tender pack may use another formula. Turnover is an indicative market norm (≈2× annual value), not a published condition.
Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid
Non-residential property renting or leasing services (CPV 7022) in Greater London — and who usually turns up
Lux Mundi Catholic Academy Trust has too little published record in this market to describe on its own; the Greater London market stands beside whatever it has. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Non-residential property renting or leasing services (CPV 7022) →
How the contest usually goes
This buyer’s published record next to the market where the work is delivered — contested contracts only, counted per lot
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
No winner size data published for this authority.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Here, local means registered in Greater London.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Winner locations not published for this authority. Local means a registered address in Greater London.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards were announced within 82 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
No award or bid-count records published for this authority.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid0%
2–350%
4–650%
7+0%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate60%
Within ±2%20%
Above estimate20%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors — from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 7022Published estimate£3,900,000
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 43 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid5%
2–344%
4–637%
7+14%
i
Where the winning price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A guide, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
| Supplier | This buyer’s earlier contract | Lot | Award value | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ||||
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
| Supplier | Won in this category | Live contracts | Award vs estimate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| — | ||||
Coverage and what to read with care
- Each figure explains itself. The on a figure says what it is, how it is counted and which scope this notice’s own record came from (class, division, all categories, or the authority’s 24-month row). The two sides are never blended. A lot’s own market is read at its delivery region where the lot names one; where it names several, or none that can be resolved, the chart falls back to the UK-wide record for the same category and says so under the bar. An empty cell means the source published nothing usable. Long form: Methodology.
- When we call out a difference. A buyer figure is only flagged against the market when the sample is large enough that the gap is unlikely to be chance; at most two callouts appear, always phrased as a comparison with both numbers and the sample size.
- Coverage (re-measured 5 Oct on the live record, 94,497 awarded procedures of the last three years). 51 % publish a bid count and 72 % a delivery region, so the market column reads the authority’s registered region when the notice names none, labelled. Of the 17,687 award-vs-estimate pairs, 34 % sit exactly on the estimate — the buyer published the award at the figure it advertised. n is on every figure; a thin sample is muted, never hidden, and a distribution is not drawn as percentages below ten observations.
- “Match”, text similarity, the expected-bid figure and the distribution drawn beneath it are model outputs, not published facts or win probabilities. Find a Tender does not publish who is bidding. Never shown: contact details, payment behaviour, or a recommended price.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Competitive flexible procedure
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Requests to participate open
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Yes (GPA, CPTPP)
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 8 Oct 2026, 14:20 BST
- Last source update
- 8 Oct 2026, 14:20 BST
- Award evaluation window
- Submission end — 29 Jan 2027
- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-095255- Latest notice
- Tender notice (UK4)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0783ddFind a Tender
- How it runs
- This procurement will be run under the Competitive Flexible Procedure. This will follow a two stage approach, with stage 1 being the Procurement Specific Questionnaire (PSQ). Here a minimum of 5 candidates (or less, in the event less than 5 meet the minimum criteria) and a maximum of 10 candidates, will progress to stage 2. Any selection of tenderers will be based solely on the criteria set out for the procurement and a minimum score of 60% must be achieved. Selected tenderers will then be invited to stage 2, the Invitation To Tender (ITT). Here, the evaluation of tender response will be set as 50% price and 50% quality.
How to participate & submission route
Official notice Submit via Delta eSourcing- Requests to participate (first stage)
- 6 Nov 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Tender submission deadline
- 6 Nov 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Clarification deadline
- 6 Nov 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Submission channel
- Official e-sourcing portal
- Electronic submission
- Allowed
- Accepted languages
- en
Timeline
5 published dates · Europe/London- Tender notice publishedearlier today8 Oct 2026, 14:20 BST
- Clarification questions byin 29 days6 Nov 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Submission deadlinein 29 days6 Nov 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Award decision expected byin 113 days29 Jan 2027, 23:59 GMT
- Contract startsin 174 days1 Apr 2027, 00:00 BST
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Nothing awarded yet- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Notice history
2 events · 1 release on Find a Tender · since 8 Oct 2026- Tender notice published8 Oct 2026, 14:20 BSTUK4
- First tender notice published8 Oct 2026, 14:20 BST
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
2 public bodies on the noticeOther public bodies
- RIVA Partnership LtdProcuring entityProcurement Consultancy supporting the Contracting Authority
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender