Official UK procurement notice
Lift Refurbishment and Replacements – Keel Court, Green Dragon Court, Fairlead House and Bordeaux House
Authority: The Riverside Group Limited (Public body)·On behalf of: Karbon Homes
What is being bought4 lots · detail below
Published requirement descriptionTRG have a requirement Lift Replacement and/or Refurbishment. The tender will cover 4 lots.
The lot structure will be as follows:
• Lot 1 – Keel Court, 11 Newport Avenuen, E14 2DT (Refurbishment)
• Lot 2 – Green Dragon Yard, Old Montague Street, E1 5NJ (Replacement)
• Lot 3 – Fairlead House, Cassilis Road, E14 9LB (Replacement)
• Lot 4 – Bordeaux House, 1 Luxembourg Mews, E15 1SD (Refurbishment)
Bidders can bid for any combination of lots but should note that all four sites will need to commence as soon as possible after award and run concurrently, therefore any Bidder that wins more than one Lot will need to demonstrate that they have the capacity to deliver at multiple sites at the same time.
CPV: Installation services of lifting equipment · Lift and escalator installation work · Lift installation work
Lots and requirements (4)Procurement structure
4 lots · all with a published value (£1,000,000 together) · same conditions of participation on every lot · same evaluation weights on every lotLot #1Lot 1 – Keel Court, 11 Newport Avenuen, E14 2DT (Refurbishment)Published value£300,000
- Value
- £300,000 exc. VAT · £360,000 inc. VAT
Lot #2Lot 2 – Green Dragon Yard, Old Montague Street, E1 5NJ (Replacement)Published value£400,000
- Value
- £400,000 exc. VAT · £480,000 inc. VAT
Lot #3Lot 3 – Fairlead House, Cassilis Road, E14 9LB (Replacement)Published value£200,000
- Value
- £200,000 exc. VAT · £240,000 inc. VAT
Lot #4Lot 4 – Bordeaux House, 1 Luxembourg Mews, E15 1SD (Refurbishment)Published value£100,000
- Value
- £100,000 exc. VAT · £120,000 inc. VAT
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published — the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
- Economic & financial standingRefer to Document A - ITT
- Technical & professional abilityRefer to Document A - ITT and Document B Specfication
Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid
How The Riverside Group Limited buys Electrical installation work (CPV 4531) — and who usually turns up
The Riverside Group Limited’s own published record, next to the Greater London market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are kept out: they attract a different number of bids. Whole-market view: Electrical installation work (CPV 4531) →
How the contest usually goes
Left: this authority. Right: the market where the work is delivered. Bids and award-vs-estimate pairs are per lot, from contested contracts only — direct awards (including PA 2023 transparency notices) report one bid by definition and are left out. On Procurement Act 2023 notices the count is the tenders assessed at the final stage, not every submission received; pairs compare like with like (VAT-exclusive, or VAT-inclusive on both sides). Empty means nothing was published, not filled in from elsewhere.
The Riverside Group Limited
contract notices in 36 months: 7 in CPV 4531 (1 route not published) · 48 in division 45 (3 route not published) · 75 in all categories (8 route not published)
i
How many companies usually bid for work like this.
Middle value of published bid counts, one per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.
Based on this buyer’s tenders in this sector (CPV 4531), last 36 months: 5 lots. All 5 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices, which count bids assessed.
Nothing is filled in from UK-wide numbers. An empty tile means nothing usable was published.
i
How often only one company bid.
Share of lots that received exactly one bid, on the same competitions as the bids figure.
Based on this buyer’s tenders in this sector (CPV 4531), last 36 months: 5 lots.
High means a thin market or an incumbent that is hard to beat.
i
Do awards for work like this land above or below the estimate.
Estimate against award per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.
Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 36 months: 1 pairs. Small sample.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Based on this buyer’s tenders in this industry (CPV 45), last 36 months: 6 notices.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
i
How often this buyer changes a notice after publishing it.
Middle number of amendments per notice. Deadline extensions and corrections both count.
Based on this buyer’s tenders in all categories, last 24 months: 85 notices.
i
How often this buyer awards without a competition.
Direct or limited awards as a share of its notices that say which procedure was used. These routes are legal in defined cases. This is just the record.
Based on this buyer’s tenders in this sector (CPV 4531), last 36 months: 6 notices.
Greater London · Electrical installation work (CPV 4531)
contract notices delivered in Greater London in 36 months: 193 in CPV 4531 (156 competed, 30 route not published) · 1,822 in division 45 (1,352 competed, 321 route not published)
i
How many companies usually bid for work like this.
Middle value of published bid counts, one per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.
Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 4531), last 36 months: 68 lots. 44 lots are from Procurement Act 2023 notices (bids assessed, middle 5.5) and 24 from older notices (bids received, middle 3.5).
Nothing is filled in from UK-wide numbers. An empty tile means nothing usable was published.
i
How often only one company bid.
Share of lots that received exactly one bid, on the same competitions as the bids figure.
Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 4531), last 36 months: 68 lots.
High means a thin market or an incumbent that is hard to beat.
i
Do awards for work like this land above or below the estimate.
Estimate against award per lot, for this buyer or this region in the same sector.
Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 4531), last 36 months: 32 pairs.
A past pattern, not a price to bid.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the deadline to the first award notice, on competitions that published both dates.
Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 4531), last 36 months: 41 notices.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
i
How much of this market goes to small and medium firms.
SME bidders where buyers published the split, otherwise SME winners.
Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 4531), last 36 months: 50 lots.
i
How much work like this goes to companies based in the delivery region.
Awards in this category delivered here where the winner’s registered address is in the region.
Based on this region’s tenders in this sector (CPV 4531), last 36 months: 100 awards.
Registered address, so a national firm with a local branch counts as outside.
i
Where this tender’s estimate would land if the usual pattern repeats.
We apply the buyer’s usual movement between estimate and award (or the region’s) to the estimate on this notice.
This notice gives one total for several lots, so we show the percentage but do not turn it into pounds.
A benchmark, not a price to bid.
Who you are likely to meet i
Who you may be up against.
Suppliers on this buyer’s earlier similar contracts, and suppliers whose record fits this tender.
A guess from the record. Buyers do not publish who is bidding.
i
Who you may be up against.
Suppliers on this buyer’s earlier similar contracts, and suppliers whose record fits this tender.
A guess from the record. Buyers do not publish who is bidding.
Suppliers on this authority’s earlier similar contracts, then suppliers with a matching track record — from published award history, not a bid list
By lot · 4 lots i
Likely bidders for each lot.
For each lot: the previous winner, suppliers with history on this lot, and suppliers strong in this category.
A guess from the record, not a bidder list.
i
Likely bidders for each lot.
For each lot: the previous winner, suppliers with history on this lot, and suppliers strong in this category.
A guess from the record, not a bidder list.
| Lot | Awarded / admitted | Likely suppliers |
|---|---|---|
Lot 1 – Keel Court, 11 Newport Avenuen, E14 2DT (Refurbishment)£300,000 · CPV 45313100 · expect ≈ £300k (at estimate, Greater London) CPV market ranking when lot-specific history is thin. | — |
|
Lot 2 – Green Dragon Yard, Old Montague Street, E1 5NJ (Replacement)£400,000 · CPV 45313100 · expect ≈ £400k (at estimate, Greater London) CPV market ranking when lot-specific history is thin. | — |
|
Lot 3 – Fairlead House, Cassilis Road, E14 9LB (Replacement)£200,000 · CPV 45313100 · expect ≈ £200k (at estimate, Greater London) CPV market ranking when lot-specific history is thin. | — |
|
Lot 4 – Bordeaux House, 1 Luxembourg Mews, E15 1SD (Refurbishment)£100,000 · CPV 45313100 · expect ≈ £100k (at estimate, Greater London) CPV market ranking when lot-specific history is thin. | — |
|
Ranked by CPV market fit, scale and buyer history — historical public-sector wins, not the published bidder list or a predicted field. Lots with the same shortlist are grouped.
Suppliers with a similar track record — and how they price i
Suppliers with a similar track record, and how they price.
Suppliers matched on wins in this category, history with this buyer, location and size. Their award vs estimate is from their own past wins.
A guess from the record, not a bidder list.
i
Suppliers with a similar track record, and how they price.
Suppliers matched on wins in this category, history with this buyer, location and size. Their award vs estimate is from their own past wins.
A guess from the record, not a bidder list.
| Supplier | Evidence | Last award | Their award vs estimate | Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Integral SME | 8 class wins | 1 months ago | no comparable pairs | 58% |
| The Barnes Group T/a Bower Fuller SME | 12 class wins | 1 months ago | no comparable pairs | 58% |
| VVB Engineering (UK) Ltd | 11 class wins | 1 months ago | no comparable pairs | 57% |
| UK Power Networks Large | 9 class wins | 1 months ago | no comparable pairs | 54% |
| scci alphatrack ltd Large | 4 class wins | 5 months ago | at estimate n=1 | 53% |
Matched by the nightly worker on class wins, buyer history, delivery geography, scale and notice text; relevance is a 0–100% heuristic score, not a probability of bidding. “Their award vs estimate” is that supplier’s middle value on its own comparable single-supplier wins, CPV 4531 first. Nobody here is known to be bidding.
Coverage and what to read with care
- Each tile explains itself. The on a figure says what it is, how it is counted and which scope this notice’s own record came from (class, division, all categories, or the authority’s 24-month row). The two columns are never blended and nothing is filled from a UK-wide figure; an empty tile means the source published nothing usable. Long form: Methodology.
- Coverage. Roughly 40 % of notices publish a bid count; about half publish an ITL1 delivery location, so the market column reads the authority’s registered region when the notice has none (labelled). About 30 % of award-vs-estimate pairs are exact matches — the buyer published the award at the estimate. n is on every figure; a thin sample is muted, never hidden.
- “Match” and “relevance” are model scores from the nightly matcher, not published facts. Find a Tender does not publish who is bidding. Never shown: contact details, payment behaviour, or a recommended price.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Open procedure
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Works
- Notice status
- Open for tender
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- No (one-off requirement)
- First published
- 21 Sept 2026, 14:39 BST
- Last source update
- 21 Sept 2026, 14:39 BST
- Award evaluation window
- Submission end — 1 Feb 2027, 23:59 GMT
- Latest notice
- Tender notice (UK4)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-077699Find a Tender
How to participate & submission route
Official notice Submit via In-tend- Expression of interest (EOI)
- —
- Tender submission deadline
- 23 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
- Clarification deadline
- —
- Submission channel
- Official e-sourcing portal
- Electronic submission
- Allowed
- Accepted languages
- en
Timeline
4 published dates · Europe/London- Tender notice published6 days ago21 Sept 2026, 14:39 BST
- Submission deadlinein 26 days23 Oct 2026, 12:00 BST
- Award decision expected byin 128 days1 Feb 2027, 23:59 GMT
- Contract startsin 185 days1 Apr 2027, 00:00 BST
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Nothing awarded yet- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Tender notice published21 Sept 2026, 14:39 BSTUK4
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
2 public bodies on the noticeOther public bodies
- Karbon HomesBeneficiary authority
Official documents & specifications (3)
Official links; attachments are not copiedTender pack and attachments
- Bidding documents and specifications
- Conflict of interest declarationNot published
Notices published for this procedure
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender