Official UK procurement notice
Legal Advisor for Birmingham Smithfield Regeneration Project
Authority: Birmingham City Council (Local council)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionThis is a VEAT notice of Birmingham City Council's ('Council') intention to enter into a Contract Variation of the legal advice with the incumbent supplier following a period of 10 days from the date of publication of this notice. The Contract Variation provides for additional legal advice required to conclude the contract for the Smithfield Regeneration Project.
CPV: Legal advisory services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1The Council requires legal advice that supported the procurement process for the…
The Council requires legal advice that supported the procurement process for the Smithfield Regeneration Project and awarded a contract following a further competition exercise using the Crown Commercial Service Legal Services Framework Agreement in December 2016 for a 4 year period.
The services were as follows:
- Assistance in developing operational model options providing advice on the legal implications to the Council
- Identify appropriate forms of development/investment partner contract/agreement(s) providing advice on the legal implications to the Council
- Provide legal advice for general corporate matters including Company law, Joint Ventures, Taxation (including VAT) and Venture capital advice
- Assist in drafting development/investment partner contract/agreement(s)
- Assist in executing development/investment partner contract/agreement(s)
- Provide legal advice on Property and Estates matters including Acquisitions and disposals (including relevant tax advice), Compulsory purchases, Leases, licences and conveyancing, Landlord and tenant matters, Site re-developments/ property development
- Provide legal advice on General Commercial matters including Public Procurement, Contract advice or drafting, PPP/PFIs including project finance, Partnering/ alliance arrangements, Outsourcing/contracting out of services, Competition law, Regulatory law and Public infrastructure regulation
Further legal advice and enhanced due diligence is needed to continue to efficiently and effectively deal with the complexities of the procurement to protect the Council's interests, maximise value for money and reduce the level of risk exposure for the process to the entering of the contract with the Development Partner. The additional complexities identified throughout the process were unforeseen, in particular due to the size and profile of the development. These additional services include:
- Dealing with Land Registry enquiries, reviewing title deeds and preparing land registry applications.
- Negotiating and finalising the Joint Venture Agreement, Site Assembly Agreement, form of Phase Development Agreement, [Phase] [Leases], and related ancillary documents Construction documents namely - JCT design & build contract, JCT design & build sub-contract, Construction Management Agreement, Trade Contract, Parent Company Guarantee, and a Performance Bond to formally appoint the Development/Investment Partner for Birmingham Smithfield.
- Preparing a tailored EZ Funding Agreement to appropriately extend the Council's EZ capital funding obligations onto the Development Partner.
Consequently, the project has proved to be more complex and is taking longer to finalise than originally envisaged. The recommended supplier has provided a satisfactory level of service to date and to ensure the continuity of the high quality legal advice it is vital for the successful delivery of this complex project. It would also eliminate the inherent unacceptable risk of inconsistent legal advice, duplication of costs, and significant delays to the project if the service were to be competitively procured resulting in a change to the supplier.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record · publisher note attached- Procedure method
- Negotiated without publication of a contract notice
- Legal basis
- CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Awarded
- Procurement threshold
- Unspecified in notice
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Yes (GPA)
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 9 Mar 2021, 13:00 GMT
- Last source update
- 9 Mar 2021, 13:00 GMT
- Authority reference
P0350- FTS notice number
2021/S 000-004702- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0299cfFind a Tender
- Why no open competition
- Additional deliveries by the original supplier ordered under the strict conditions stated in the directive
- Published justification
Regulation 72(1)(b) PCR: For the reasons set out in II.2.4 above, the provision of additional services has become necessary and a change of provider:
(i) cannot be made for economic and technical reasons due to the complexity of the project during the preferred bidder stage and the need to consistent legal advice that is vital for one of the Council's major developments to supporting the economic growth of the city; and
(ii) would cause significant inconvenience and substantial duplication of costs for the Council in terms of the likely delays and increased risks of involving a new provider.
The Council further considers the proposed extensions to be lawfully permitted in accordance with Regulation 72(1)(c) of PCR on the basis that:
(i) the need for the additional advice has fully crystallised following scope changes to the project which the Council could not have foreseen; and
(ii) the services to be provided by the incumbent will remain consistent and there will be no alteration to the overall nature of the Contract.
The Council will publish a Modification Notice pursuant to Regulation 72(3) of PCR.
Publisher note: Award of a contract without prior publication of a call for competition in the Official Journal of the European Union in the cases listed below • The procurement falls outside the scope of application of the directive Explanation: Regulation 72(1)(b) PCR: For the reasons set out in II.2.4 above, the provision of additional services has become necessary and a change of provider: (i) cannot be made for economic and technical reasons due to the complexity of the project during the preferred bidder stage and the need to consistent legal advice that is vital for one of the Council's major developments to supporting the economic growth of the city; and (ii) would cause significant inconvenience and substantial duplication of costs for the Council in terms of the likely delays and increased risks of involving a new provider. The Council further considers the proposed extensions to be lawfully permitted in accordance with Regulation 72(1)(c) of PCR on the basis that: (i) the need for the additional advice has fully crystallised following scope changes to the project which the Council could not have foreseen; and (ii) the services to be provided by the incumbent will remain consistent and there will be no alteration to the overall nature of the Contract. The Council will publish a Modification Notice pursuant to Regulation 72(3) of PCR.
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Published awards, contracts and bid statistics, not a forecast| Awarded to | Value | Date | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bevan BrittanLegal Advisor for the Birmingham Smithfield Regeneration Project | £201,011 † | — | Awarded |
Contracts
Legal Advisor for the Birmingham Smithfield Regeneration Project · Bevan Brittan
- Signed
- 23 Nov 2016
- Value
- £201,011
- Status
- active
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Dispute resolution & review bodies
- High Court of England and WalesReview body
Bidders & participating suppliers
1 commercial party on the notice- Bevan Brittan LLPAwarded supplier
Official documents & specifications
Official links; attachments are not copiedNo document links were published on the notice.