Find a Tender
complete
Official procurement procedure
Independent Insurance Claims Handling Services
Insurance services
UK
Published value
Not published
Submission deadline Not published
Lots published1
Procurement Executive Summary
AI & Search Synopsis
Generated from official OCDS record
Tenderline Synopsis: Financial Services Compensation Scheme: "Independent Insurance Claims Handling Services". Published status: complete. Published value: Value not published. 1 published lot. Submission deadline not published. See the official notice for participation instructions.
| Contracting Authority | Financial Services Compensation Scheme | Scope & Categories | Not published | Submission Window | complete No deadline published |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Submission Gateway | Direct notice route | Legal Basis & Regime | Standard procurement | Estimated Value (exc. VAT) | Not published |
Bidder Intelligence · Authority Profile: Financial Services Compensation Scheme
Market Analytics
Derived from OCDS awards & bid statistics
Published history for Financial Services Compensation Scheme. These figures describe retained records, not a forecast of bids or a measure of buyer bias.
Published-to-award variance
Not availableInsufficient comparable data
Competition Density
6.9Bids / Report
Supplier ConcentrationNo estimate
Insufficient attributable awardsNo concentration estimate availablePayment Terms
Check noticePublished terms
Coverage: 24 active published awards; 24 bid reports (which may be per lot). Supplier values exclude multi-supplier awards, frameworks and DPS, and use GBP only. They are published award values, not payments. Published-to-award variance compares single-lot, single-award, single-supplier GBP procedures with explicitly non-framework/non-DPS status; increases remain in the average. Unpublished data stays unknown. Awarded suppliers are winners, not all bidders.
Procedure terms
Contracting AuthorityFinancial Services Compensation Scheme | Procedure methodNot published | Procurement categoryNot published |
Statuscomplete | Framework / DPSNot published | CompetitionNot published |
Above thresholdNot published | Legal basisNot published | Tender period startsNot published |
Clarification deadlineNot published | Electronic submissionNot published | Submission languagesNot published |
Published17 Jan 2025, 14:05 GMT | Last source update17 Jan 2025, 14:05 GMT | Recurring procurementNot published |
ClassificationInsurance services | ||
Delivery area UK | ||
OCIDocds-h6vhtk-04d43f | ||
What is being bought
Handling of FSCS protected claims in respect of Independent Insurance Company Ltd.
What changed
From the official release history
- Status changed to complete
17 Jan 2025, 14:05 GMT - Official notice release published
17 Jan 2025, 14:05 GMT - Buyer information updated
17 Jan 2025, 14:05 GMT
Lots and requirements (1)
Published by the contracting authority
- Lot 1 · #1Individual lot title not publishedcancelledPublished valueNot publishedFor the provision of claims handling services in relation to IICLContract periodNot publishedEligibilityNot publishedOptions / renewalNot published
Timeline
- Procedure published
17 Jan 2025, 14:05 GMT - Award active
Not published · Not published - Contract active
Signed 12 Dec 2024, 00:00 GMT · £4,005,600
Commercial outcome and competition
Awards Western Mortgage Services Limited Not published · Not published · active |
Contracts Contract £4,005,600 · signed 12 Dec 2024, 00:00 GMT · active |
Bid statistics bids: 1 (lot 1) |
Buyer and organisations in this procedure
Financial Services Compensation Scheme
Contracting authority GB-FTS-860Documents (0)
Official links; attachments are not copied
No linked documents are published
Related procedures (0)
No related procedures published
Planning and rationale
Planning budgetNot published |
No-engagement rationaleNot published |
Procedure rationaleFSCS has awarded the contract to Western Mortgage Services Limited (WMSL) under Regulation 32(2)(b)(ii) of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 on the basis that the services can only be provided by that firm as competition is absent for technical reasons and no reasonable alternative exists. This is for two principal reasons. Specifically, this contract is for Independent Insurance Company Limited (in liquidation) (“IICL”) insurance run-off claims handling for FSCS in the context of FSCS carrying out its public law statutory function. It is a technical exercise requiring a unique set of knowledge and skills and not simply an administrative or straightforward claims handling. The complex and bespoke nature of the service (and vulnerable nature of individuals benefitting from it) means that a particularly experienced and skilled cohort of staff is essential for the delivery to the required quality standards. FSCS does not consider that it would be possible for any other provider to develop sufficient skills and knowledge nor to recruit and train sufficiently qualified staff within an acceptable time period, leading to an unacceptably long transition period, given the initial contract term of only two years. Such a long transition period would have an adverse effect on timely meeting of claims and risk destabilising service provision. FSCS therefore considers that to award the contract to an alternative provider would lead to an unacceptable degree of risk to performance of the services and FSCS being able to discharge its statutory duties. The documentation and data required for the ongoing work is held across a number of platforms, some dating back many years and incompatible with current technology. The firm appointed needs full access to, and ability to use, all such documentation and data as it relates to FSCS “protected claims” to carry out the work. As a result, the identification, conversion, extraction and migration of the relevant data to a state and platform which would be usable by any service provider other than this company (or an associated company) would be so complex, time-consuming and costly as to be prohibitive. In addition, aspects of the arrangement are subject to confidentiality obligations to which FSCS is not a party, adding further complication. All of FSCS’s requirements for this service are objectively justified by the nature, complexity and context of the services, factors relating to the individuals making the relevant claims, the way in which documents and data are held and the existence of third party confidentiality arrangements to which FSCS is not a party. The absence of competition is not the result of an artificial narrowing of the parameters of the procurement and no reasonable alternative exists. It is not reasonable to relax any of the above requirements as this would expose FSCS and its customers to an unacceptable degree of risk. |