Find a TenderPlanned procurement
Published 20 Nov 2024, 15:35 GMT

Official UK procurement notice

HMPPS Retail Services Supplier Consultation

Authority: Ministry of Justice (Central government)

Services
Planned pipeline valueValue not publishedpipeline notice, not a live tender
Tender notice expected 1 Aug 2027from the planned procurement notice

What is being bought

Published requirement description

The Ministry of Justice would like to invite varied suppliers from the retail and logistics sector to discuss future methods of delivering retail services within HMPPS.

A virtual event will be held at 3pm on Thursday 28th November 2024.

Please contact [email protected] to register your interest in this event and receive an invitation.

CPV: Hotel, restaurant and retail trade services · Warehousing services

The lotProcurement structure

single lot · no lot value published
Lot #1Retail goods and logisticsPlanned

Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published

How Ministry of Justice buys Hotel, restaurant and retail trade services (CPV 55), and who usually turns up

Ministry of Justice’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Hotel, restaurant and retail trade services (CPV 55) →

1

How the contest usually goes

Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.

Question for the bid
This buyerMinistry of Justice · all categories
What to do with it
How often do SMEs win?
i

How often small and medium firms win.

Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.

The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 140 of 259 known-size awards · market: division 55 · UK-wide, n=530
54%29%

Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.

How often do local suppliers win?
i

How often local firms win similar work.

Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.

Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered.

A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 10 of 15 known-location awards · market: division 55 · UK-wide, n=612
67%53%

Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.

How long to a decision?
i

How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.

Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.

Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: 19 decided notices · market: division 55 · UK-wide, n=233
56 days67 days

Half of these awards have an award date within 56 days of the bid deadline.

How often single-bid or direct?
i

How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.

Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.

Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.

Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.

Last 36 months.

Buyer: at least 140 of 338 procurements with awards had no recorded rival · market: division 55 · UK-wide, n=676
41%31%

Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.

How many bids did past lots attract?

i

How many bids past lots received.

Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.

Past bids do not predict this tender.

Last 36 months.

This buyer44 lots with bid counts · all categories
7% had one bid
The market476 lots with bid counts · division 55 · UK-wide
16% had one bid
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
1 bid7% / 16%
Buyer: 3 of 44 lots with published bid counts. Market: 75 of 476 lots with published bid counts.
2–357% / 34%
Buyer: 25 of 44 lots with published bid counts. Market: 163 of 476 lots with published bid counts.
4–623% / 42%
Buyer: 10 of 44 lots with published bid counts. Market: 202 of 476 lots with published bid counts.
7+14% / 8%
Buyer: 6 of 44 lots with published bid counts. Market: 36 of 476 lots with published bid counts.

How did awards compare with estimates?

i

Where winning prices landed against estimates.

Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.

Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.

Last 36 months.

This buyer27 lots with estimate and award · all categories
56% below estimate
The market310 lots with estimate and award · division 55 · UK-wide
19% below estimate
Buyer / market · select a colour for counts
Below estimate56% / 19%
Buyer: 15 of 27 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 59 of 310 lots with an estimate and award.
Within ±2%30% / 44%
Buyer: 8 of 27 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 137 of 310 lots with an estimate and award.
Above estimate15% / 37%
Buyer: 4 of 27 lots with an estimate and award. Market: 114 of 310 lots with an estimate and award.
2

Assess each lot
i

What past awards tell you about each lot.

See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.

No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.

Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list

Lot #1Retail goods and logisticsCPV 55Estimate not published

This lot lists more than one class in CPV 55. The comparison uses that group.

Expected competition
i

How many bids this lot may attract.

The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.

Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 476 past lots.

A forecast, not a list of bidders.

—No model forecast yet16% chance of a single bid
Past bids on 476 similar lots
1 bid16%
75 of 476 similar past lots received 1 bid (16%).
2–334%
163 of 476 similar past lots received 2–3 (34%).
4–642%
202 of 476 similar past lots received 4–6 (42%).
7+8%
36 of 476 similar past lots received 7+ (8%).
Comparable past lots usually drew 3.5 bids.
Commercial price forecast
i

Where the award price may land.

The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.

No comparable awards for this lot yet.

A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.

—Estimate not published
The buyer published no estimate for this lot, so there is nothing to forecast against. A price prediction here would be a number about a number we do not have.

Who has supplied this buyer on similar work?
i

Who has done similar work for this buyer.

Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.

A past supplier may not bid again.

No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.

Who could compete for this lot?
i

Who could compete for this lot?

Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.

None is confirmed as a bidder.

Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.

About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
  • Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.

Procedure terms & legal framework

From the official record
Legal basis
CELEX · 32014L0024 Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (Directive 2014/24/EU)
Procurement category
Services
Notice status
Planned procurement
Procurement threshold
Unspecified in notice
Regulatory regime
Standard
Commercial structure
Stand-alone contract (no framework)
Competition type
Competitive procedure
GPA / WTO covered
Yes (GPA)
Recurring procurement
Unspecified in notice
First published
20 Nov 2024, 15:35 GMT
Last source update
20 Nov 2024, 15:35 GMT
FTS notice number
2024/S 000-037563
Classification (CPV)
Hotel, restaurant and retail trade servicesWarehousing services
Delivery area
UK
Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-04bd64 Find a Tender

How it was run

Official notice
Submission deadline
—

Timeline

20 Nov 2024 → 1 Aug 2027 · 2 dates
  1. Notice published
    20 Nov 2024, 15:35 GMT
  2. Today
    26 Oct 2026
  3. Tender notice expectedin 279 days
    1 Aug 2027, 00:00 BST

Commercial outcome & contract awards

Pipeline notice
Awards (0)
No award published
Contracts (0)
No contract published
Bid statistics
No aggregate bid statistics published

Contracting authority & participating public bodies

Ministry of Justice

Contracting authorityCentral GovernmentMinistry or any other national or federal authority, including their regional or local subdivisionsGeneral public services 5 Wellington Place, Leeds, UK, LS1 4APContact email, phone

Official documents & specifications

Official links; attachments are not copied

No document links were published on the notice.