Official UK procurement notice
GCC026 - Provision of Somewhere Safe to Stay Hubs in Cheltenham and Gloucester
Authority: Gloucester City Council (Local council)
Background. Two Lots and each lot has a value of £1,360,000. Published lot titles: Lot 1: Cheltenham Somewhere Safe to Stay Hub (serving Cheltenham, Cotswold, Forest of Dean, Stroud and Tewkesbury); Lot 2: Gloucester Somewhere Safe to Stay Hub (serving Gloucester City).
What is being bought2 lots · detail below
Published requirement descriptionBackground
Two Lots and each lot has a value of £1,360,000
Open procedure - above threshold.
The Authority is seeking to commission two Somewhere Safe to Stay Hub services to provide direct access emergency accommodation, assessment, stabilisation and housing-focused support for people who are sleeping rough or at imminent risk of rough sleeping across Gloucestershire.
The Services will be commissioned as two separate Lots:
Lot 1: Cheltenham Somewhere Safe to Stay Hub (serving Cheltenham, Cotswold, Forest of Dean, Stroud and Tewkesbury)
Lot 2: Gloucester Somewhere Safe to Stay Hub (serving Gloucester City)
Potential Providers may submit a tender for one Lot only.
Please see the time tables for each lot within the ITT document.
CPV: Other community, social and personal services
Lots and requirements (2)Procurement structure
2 lots · all with a published value (£2,266,667 together) · same evaluation weights on every lotLot #1Cheltenham Somewhere Safe to Stay Hub (serving Cheltenham, Cotswold, Forest of Dean, Stroud and Tewkesbury)Published value£1,133,333
See ITT and Scope for detail.
Lot 1: Cheltenham Somewhere Safe to Stay Hub (serving Cheltenham, Cotswold, Forest of Dean, Stroud and Tewkesbury)
Lot #2Gloucester Somewhere Safe to Stay Hub (serving Gloucester City)Published value£1,133,333
See ITT and Scope for detail.
Lot 2: Gloucester Somewhere Safe to Stay Hub (serving Gloucester City)
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Published sub-criteria (2)
- Quality to include Social Value = 80%: 80%
- Price = 20%: 20%
Published award criteria (2)
- Quality to include Social Value = 80%
- Price = 20%
No conditions of participation were published on the notice; check the tender documents.
- Price carries 20 of 100 points: a 10% discount moves about 2 points. The method statement decides this lot, not the discount.
- Turnover usually expected: about £566,279 per lot (twice each lot's annual value).
Price arithmetic assumes straight proportional scoring; the tender pack may use another formula. Turnover is an indicative market norm (≈2× annual value), not a published condition.
Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid
How Gloucester City Council buys Other community, social and personal services (CPV 98), and who usually turns up
Gloucester City Council’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Other community, social and personal services (CPV 98) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in South West England (authority’s region).
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 36 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Missing bid counts may hide more single-bid awards. This share is a minimum.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid25% / 25%
2–30% / 38%
4–613% / 21%
7+63% / 17%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate71% / 19%
Within ±2%14% / 70%
Above estimate14% / 11%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1Cheltenham Somewhere Safe to Stay Hub (serving Cheltenham, Cotswold, Forest of Dean, Stroud and Tewkesbury)CPV 98Published estimate£1.1m
This lot lists more than one class in CPV 98. The comparison uses that group.
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 48 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid25%
2–338%
4–621%
7+17%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
Lot #2Gloucester Somewhere Safe to Stay Hub (serving Gloucester City)CPV 98Published estimate£1.1m
This lot lists more than one class in CPV 98. The comparison uses that group.
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 48 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid25%
2–338%
4–621%
7+17%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly. Contracts Finder contracts appear on the Retender Radar, not yet in these figures.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Open procedure
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Open for tender
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 4 Nov 2026, 11:18 GMT
- Last source update
- 4 Nov 2026, 11:18 GMT
- Award evaluation window
- Submission end – 4 Jan 2027
- Authority reference
GCC026- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-104575- Latest notice
- Tender notice (UK4)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Not published
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-07b2adFind a Tender
How to participate & submission route
Official notice Submit via ProContract (Due North)- Requests to participate (first stage)
- —
- Tender submission deadline
- 30 Nov 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Clarification deadline
- —
- Submission channel
- Official e-sourcing portal
- Electronic submission
- Allowed
- Accepted languages
- en
Timeline
4 Nov 2026 → 8 Jan 2027 · 4 dates- Tender notice published7h ago4 Nov 2026, 11:18 GMT
- Today4 Nov 2026
- Submission deadlinein 25 days30 Nov 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Award decision expected byin 61 days4 Jan 2027, 23:59 GMT
- Contract startsin 64 days8 Jan 2027
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Tender notice published4 Nov 2026, 11:18 GMTUK4
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Nothing awarded yet- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender