Official UK procurement notice
Framework Agreement for Videography Services
Authority: Liverpool John Moores University (Education)
This scope of works outlines the requirements for the provision of a videography framework for multiple suppliers. The framework(s) will run for three years and will include an option to extend for a further two, twelve-month periods, all projects shall be priced and agreed by LJMU before work commence.
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionThis scope of works outlines the requirements for the provision of a videography framework for multiple suppliers.
The framework(s) will run for three years and will include an option to extend for a further two, twelve-month periods, all projects shall be priced and agreed by LJMU before work commence
The Videography Framework will provide LJMU with suppliers who can deliver in scope full videography and multimedia development services for both Marketing Services and Corporate Communications.
Being appointed to this Framework is no guarantee of revenue.
LJMU intend to use students from the Screen School for some projects throughout the Academic year to enable employability opportunities, therefore those appointed to the framework will not be offered these projects.
CPV: Motion picture and video production services
How this framework works
From the published notice- Type
- Closed framework
- Call-offs
- call-offs may be awarded directly or by further competition
- Framework period
- 3 yrs · up to 4 yrs from 1 Mar 2027, Budgets
- Supplier levy on call-offs (max %)
- n/a
Published description of the framework
Pls see tender pack
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · value publishedLot #1RenewalPublished value£200,000
What it takes to wini
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Evaluation split and conditions of participation as published; the tender pack may add morei
How this buyer will score bids.
The evaluation criteria and weights exactly as published on the notice, grouped by family (price, quality, social value and so on).
Lot awarding rule: Price 30% Quality - 60% Social Value - 10%
- “Framework Agreement for Videography Services” is a framework: the contest is a place on its panel, not a single contract: call-offs may be direct or by further competition.
Competition analysis · published record, not a forecast of who will bid
How Liverpool John Moores University buys Motion picture and video tape production and related services (CPV 9211), and who usually turns up
Liverpool John Moores University’s published record next to the market for the same work. Compared with other frameworks and DPS only. Whole-market view: Motion picture and video tape production and related services (CPV 9211) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning. 41 known-size awards sit across 1 procurements, so one procurement can dominate this percentage.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in North West England.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered. 43 known-location awards sit across 1 procurements, so one procurement can dominate this percentage.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 75 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
The market share is a minimum: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Missing bid counts may hide more single-bid awards. This share is a minimum.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid0%
2–30%
4–657%
7+43%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Awards below, close to or above the estimate, per lot. The buyer side adds below-threshold contracts with a pre-award estimate; an award inside a published range counts as close.
On a framework or DPS, prices are agreed when work is called off.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Not comparable on a framework or DPS: the price is set later, on each call-off.
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Our matching links this notice to “Videography Services Framework Agreement” and “Framework Agreement for Intellectual Property Services” of this authority, but none of the 8 panel members sit in a category matching this notice.
Lot #1CPV 9211Published estimate£200k
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 46 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid13%
2–317%
4–624%
7+46%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly. Contracts Finder appears in live search, the Retender Radar, contract pages, organisation counts, the earlier contracts and past suppliers on a tender's competition panel, the buyer's decision figure and its award against estimate; the other analytical figures are built from Find a Tender notices.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
What this replaces i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
48% title match.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
48% title match.
A past supplier may not bid again.
The prior contract this notice most likely re-tenders · matched by title and category (48% title match), the holder is not guaranteed to re-bid
Framework Agreement for Intellectual Property Services, winner not published; no contract end date published.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Procedure method
- Below threshold - open competition
- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Open for tender
- Procurement threshold
- Below threshold
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Framework agreement
- Who may use this agreement
- Not stated in the notice; call-off rights may be limited to the establishing authority
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 11 Nov 2026, 11:29 GMT
- Last source update
- 11 Nov 2026, 11:29 GMT
- Authority reference
LJMU 2705- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-107030- Latest notice
- Tender notice (UK4)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-07b964Find a Tender
- Reserved participation area
- K02000001
How to participate & submission route
Official notice Submit via In-tend- Requests to participate (first stage)
- —
- Appointment period ends
- 30 Nov 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Clarification deadline
- 23 Nov 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Submission channel
- Official e-sourcing portal
- Electronic submission
- Allowed
- Supplier levy on call-offs (max %)
- call-off levy · n/a
All bids must be submitted via In-tend - supplier.in-tend.co.uk/ljmu/home ↗
Please do not make direct contact with the buyer , all correspondence is dealt with via In-tend
Timeline
11 Nov 2026 → 1 Mar 2027 · 4 dates- Tender notice published1h ago11 Nov 2026, 11:29 GMT
- Today11 Nov 2026
- Clarification questions byin 11 days23 Nov 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Admission / appointment period endsin 18 days · period end, not a bid countdown30 Nov 2026, 12:00 GMT
- Contract startsin 109 days1 Mar 2027
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Tender notice published11 Nov 2026, 11:29 GMTUK4
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Nothing awarded yet- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (3)
Official links; attachments are not copiedTender pack and attachments
- Bidding documents and specifications This is the LJMU e-tendering portal Companies must register to access the documents and ask any clarification questions. The Buyer will not respond to direct contact
- Technical specifications
Notices published for this procedure
- Tender notice Tender notice on Find a Tender