Official UK procurement notice
Civil Parking Enforcement Services
Authority: Royal Borough of Greenwich (Local council)
What is being bought
Published requirement descriptionThe Supplier will be responsible for delivering a modern, professional, and fully compliant Civil Parking Enforcement service on behalf of the Council.
The following represents the current high-level understanding of core requirements.
Core Enforcement Services
- On-street and off-street enforcement: Civil Enforcement Officers deployed across CPZs, yellow lines and other restrictions under the Traffic Management Act 2004. The emphasis is on proactive, intelligence-led work on hotspots and priority locations rather than blanket coverage.
- ANPR capability: Mobile and static ANPR (vehicles or cameras) to handle higher volumes efficiently, with clean integration into the back-office system for PCN creation.
- CCTV and moving traffic support: Review of footage or clips for bus lane and moving traffic contraventions, producing good evidence packs. The split of responsibility with our existing back-office arrangements will be confirmed later.
- Blue Badge work: Focused enforcement on misuse of disabled bays and Blue Badge abuse, working closely with the Council’s Blue Badge team.
Technology, Systems and Integration
- Provision and maintenance of all necessary enforcement technology: handheld devices, body-worn video (BWV) cameras with secure storage/review workflows, vehicles (with preference for low/zero-emission options), and supporting software platforms for deployment planning, real-time reporting, and performance dashboards.
- Seamless, secure interface/integration with the Council’s existing or future back-office PCN processing system (currently supported by Imperial Civil Enforcement Solutions). This includes timely upload of PCN data, high-quality evidence packs (photos, notes, BWV where relevant), and support for case queries. Suppliers should detail their API/integration capabilities and experience with similar systems.
- Management information and reporting: Provision of accurate, timely MI and interactive dashboards covering deployment activity, PCN volumes/quality, compliance indicators, and KPIs. Potential for integration with Council Power BI or other analytics tools.
People, Training and Customer Service
- Full recruitment, training, supervision, and management of a sufficient complement of qualified, professional CEOs and support staff to deliver the required enforcement hours and quality standards.
- High standards of customer interaction: CEOs trained in conflict resolution, equality awareness, and professional engagement with residents, businesses, and visitors. Support for on-street enquiries and contribution to the Council’s complaints/SAR/FOI processes
CPV: Parking enforcement services
The lotProcurement structure
single lot · no lot value publishedLot #1PlannedRenewal
Pipeline intelligence · planning stage: how this market runs before the tender is published
How Royal Borough of Greenwich buys Civic-amenity services (CPV 9835), and who usually turns up
Royal Borough of Greenwich’s published record next to the market for the same work. Frameworks and DPS are left out: they draw different bid counts. Whole-market view: Civic-amenity services (CPV 9835) →
How the contest usually goes
Winner shares use published awards; bid and price charts use contested lots.
i
How often small and medium firms win.
Share of awards where the winner’s size is known.
The counts under this question show how many awards have a known supplier size.
Small firms have won here. Neither number says whether you qualify; it describes who has been winning.
i
How often local firms win similar work.
Winners with a registered address in the delivery region, out of awards with a known address.
Local means the winner is registered in the region where that award was delivered. The market figure counts awards delivered in Greater London.
A local branch does not count if the registered address is elsewhere.
Most of this buyer’s recorded winners were registered in the region where that award was delivered.
i
How long buyers here take to decide after bids close.
Middle value in days from the bid deadline to the award date, on competitions that published both.
Only decided tenders count, so slow ones still waiting are not in.
Half of these awards have an award date within 36 days of the bid deadline.
i
How often work is awarded with no recorded rival.
Direct awards and tenders where every published lot count shows one bid.
Both shares are minimums: some awards have no bid count.
Thin markets produce this too; it is not proof of a tailored specification.
Direct awards or one recorded bid are common here. Check the route before spending time on a bid.
How many bids did past lots attract?
i
How many bids past lots received.
Each colour is a bid-count range. Only competed lots with a published count are included.
Past bids do not predict this tender.
1 bid13% / 0%
2–335% / 67%
4–622% / 33%
7+30% / 0%
How did awards compare with estimates?
i
Where winning prices landed against estimates.
Each colour shows awards below, close to or above the published estimate, one lot at a time.
Past prices are a guide, not a bid price.
Below estimate67% / 45%
Within ±2%27% / 27%
Above estimate7% / 27%
Assess each lot i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
i
What past awards tell you about each lot.
See the forecast, this buyer’s earlier suppliers and firms with relevant wins.
No supplier is confirmed as a bidder.
Open a lot for its forecast, this buyer’s previous supplier and possible competitors, from published award history, not a bid list
Lot #1CPV 9835Estimate not published
i
How many bids this lot may attract.
The forecast uses similar past competitions. The bar shows either that forecast or past bid counts; the line below says which.
Each lot shows its own forecast based on its own category; forecasts for different lots of the same notice are not comparative. The bar shows 61 past lots.
A forecast, not a list of bidders.
1 bid15%
2–346%
4–631%
7+8%
i
Where the award price may land.
The forecast uses similar awards and the buyer’s estimate. The band covers the middle half of likely prices.
No comparable awards for this lot yet.
A statistical guide from past awards, not a price to bid.
Who has supplied this buyer on similar work? i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
i
Who has done similar work for this buyer.
Past contracts are matched by buyer, title and type of work.
A past supplier may not bid again.
No earlier contract of this buyer matches this lot on the published record.
Who could compete for this lot? i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
i
Who could compete for this lot?
Firms with relevant past wins. On a framework, we show firms on that agreement.
None is confirmed as a bidder.
Candidate suppliers for this notice have not been worked out yet, so this is not a verdict that nobody fits.
About this data
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
- Two views, kept apart. The authority’s own track record and the wider market for the same kind of work sit side by side and are never mixed. Where the local picture is too thin, a figure widens to a broader market and says which one it used.
- Forecasts are labelled. The price forecast and its range, possible competitors and the earlier-work matches are our estimates from past awards: not published facts, not win chances and not price advice. Official notices do not say who is bidding.
- Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.
Procedure terms & legal framework
From the official record- Legal basis
- UKPGA · 2023/54 Procurement Act 2023
- Procurement category
- Services
- Notice status
- Planned procurement
- Procurement threshold
- Above threshold (FTS publication)
- Regulatory regime
- Standard
- Commercial structure
- Stand-alone contract (no framework)
- Competition type
- Competitive procedure
- GPA / WTO covered
- Unspecified in notice
- Recurring procurement
- Unspecified in notice
- First published
- 30 Oct 2026, 13:05 GMT
- Last source update
- 30 Oct 2026, 13:05 GMT
- FTS notice number
2026/S 000-103206- Latest notice
- Preliminary market engagement notice (UK2)
- Classification (CPV)
- Delivery area
- Official registry OCID
ocds-h6vhtk-0794a5Find a Tender
How it was run
Official notice- Submission deadline
- —
Timeline
30 Oct 2026 → 1 Jun 2027 · 2 dates- Planning notice published8h ago30 Oct 2026, 13:05 GMT
- Today30 Oct 2026
- Contract startsin 213 days1 Jun 2027
Notice history
1 event · 1 release on Find a Tender- Preliminary market engagement notice published30 Oct 2026, 13:05 GMTUK2
Commercial outcome & contract awards
Pipeline notice- Awards (0)
- No award published
- Contracts (0)
- No contract published
- Bid statistics
- No aggregate bid statistics published
Contracting authority & participating public bodies
Official documents & specifications (1)
Official links; attachments are not copiedNotices published for this procedure
- Preliminary market engagement notice Preliminary market engagement notice on Find a Tender