TenderlineUK
Procurement Intelligence
Official OCDS
Find a Tender
complete
Official procurement procedure

2324-81-DTS-AS (Backup and Disaster Recovery System)

Data storage services
Yorkshire & Humber (UKE32)
Published value
Not published
Submission deadline Not published
Lots published1
Procurement Executive Summary
AI & Search Synopsis
Generated from official OCDS record
Tenderline Synopsis: Sheffield Hallam University: "2324-81-DTS-AS (Backup and Disaster Recovery System)". Published status: complete. Published value: Value not published. 1 published lot. Submission deadline not published. See the official notice for participation instructions.
Contracting AuthoritySheffield Hallam UniversityScope & CategoriesNot publishedSubmission Window
complete
No deadline published
Submission GatewayDirect notice routeLegal Basis & RegimeStandard procurementEstimated Value (exc. VAT)Not published
Bidder Intelligence · Authority Profile: Sheffield Hallam University
Market Analytics
View Authority Profile →
Derived from OCDS awards & bid statistics
Published history for Sheffield Hallam University. These figures describe retained records, not a forecast of bids or a measure of buyer bias.
Average Price Reduction
Not availableInsufficient comparable data
Requires at least 5 comparable procedures
Competition Density
3.7Bids / Report
59.7% of reports have one bid
Supplier ConcentrationModerate Concentration
KITLOCKER.COM LIMITEDTop vendor: 45.2% of attributable value
Payment Terms
Check noticePublished terms
Payment obligations depend on the applicable regime and contract. Consult the official documents.
Coverage: 89 active published awards; 62 bid reports (which may be per lot). Supplier values exclude multi-supplier awards, frameworks and DPS, and use GBP only. They are published award values, not payments. Price reduction compares single-lot, single-award, single-supplier GBP procedures with explicitly non-framework/non-DPS status; increases remain in the average. Unpublished data stays unknown. Awarded suppliers are winners, not all bidders.
Historical Awarded Suppliers With This Authority:
Supplier NameHistoric AwardsAttributable GBP Value
KITLOCKER.COM LIMITED1 win£290,602
JISC SERVICES LIMITED1 win£148,491
Digital Energy Group Limited1 win£116,640
APOGEE CORPORATION LIMITED1 win£56,678
COUNTER CONTEXT LIMITED1 win£15,520
Procedure terms
Contracting AuthoritySheffield Hallam University
Procedure methodNot published
Procurement categoryNot published
Statuscomplete
Framework / DPSNot published
CompetitionNot published
Above thresholdNot published
Legal basisNot published
Tender period startsNot published
Clarification deadlineNot published
Electronic submissionNot published
Submission languagesNot published
Published22 May 2025, 19:00 BST
Last source update22 May 2025, 19:00 BST
Recurring procurementNot published
ClassificationData storage services
Delivery area
Yorkshire & Humber (UKE32)
OCIDocds-h6vhtk-051f85
What is being bought
Sheffield Hallam University carried out a further competition under the SUPC Framework (Servers, Storage and Solutions National Agreement (SSSNA). Following a full evaluation of all tenders received, MTI Technology Ltd were selected as the successful supplier.
What changed
From the official release history
  1. Status changed to complete
    22 May 2025, 19:00 BST
  2. Official notice release published
    22 May 2025, 19:00 BST
  3. Buyer information updated
    22 May 2025, 19:00 BST
Lots and requirements (1)
Published by the contracting authority
  • Lot 1 · #1
    Individual lot title not published
    cancelled
    Published valueNot published
    In recent years the University has moved increasingly to cloud-based services, migrating data center workloads to Azure Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) and Platform as a Service (PaaS) public cloud services and a gradual transition of user data and workflow to Office 365 leading to a reduction in data stored on campus. As a result of this change the University's requires a robust platform that uses built-in protection services, providing the required level of data protection. The University is therefore procuring a solution to ensure robust data protection in cloud services at the same or similar level of protection as the University offers on-campus and to ensure that our on-campus backup systems are right-sized for the changed approach to services.
    Contract periodNot published
    EligibilityNot published
    Options / renewalNot published
Timeline
  1. Procedure published
    22 May 2025, 19:00 BST
  2. Award active
    Not published · Not published
  3. Contract active
    Signed 21 May 2025, 00:00 BST · £1,449,416
Commercial outcome and competition
Awards
MTI Technology Ltd
Not published · Not published · active
Contracts
Backup and Disaster Recovery System
£1,449,416 · signed 21 May 2025, 00:00 BST · active
Bid statistics
bids: 3 (lot 1)
electronicBids: 3 (lot 1)
Buyer and organisations in this procedure

Sheffield Hallam University

Contracting authority GB-UKPRN-10005790
View buyer profile

  • Sheffield Hallam University
    buyer

    GB-UKPRN: 10005790
    City Campus, Sheffield, UKE32, S11WB
    j.madafi@shu.ac.uk

  • MTI Technology Limited
    supplier

    GB-COH: SC112019
    20 Castle Terrace, Edinburgh, UKM, EH1 2EG

  • Sheffield Hallam University
    reviewBody

    Sheffield, S1 1WB
    strategicprocurement@shu.ac.uk
Documents (0)
Official links; attachments are not copied
No data
No linked documents are published
Related procedures (0)
No data
No related procedures published
Planning and rationale
Planning budgetNot published
No-engagement rationaleNot published
Procedure rationale-The contract is being awarded to a supplier within a framework following a further competition (mini-competition) under an existing compliant framework agreement, in accordance with Regulation 33 of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 (PCR 2015) and in accordance with the framework guidelines. -All suppliers on the framework capable of delivering the services were invited to participate in the mini-competition. -The award criteria used were consistent with those set out in the framework agreement and were clearly communicated to all participants.