Weir Forestry: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

SMEStirlingScotlandMain market: Horticultural services

Find a Tender organisation id115149

Procedures with an award319 award records · includes panel / call-off entries
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities2named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Last 12 months0no award in the last 12 months · last 22 Nov 2024
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Contracts ending ≤18 months4end date on 19 of 19 awards · 4 estimated
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

Buyer regions1most often Scotland
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.

19 awards (19 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named; pending awards included) · top CPV classes, shares of all 19

7730 Horticultural services15 awards · 79% · lots

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 3 of 3 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

Scotland3 procedures · 100%

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Type not classified100%(19 awards)
    19 of 19 awards are Type not classified (100%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
Forestry and Land Scotlandframework/DPS on 2266.7%1522 Nov 2024
Scottish Forestryframework/DPS on 1133.3%43 May 2024

Share = of the 3 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Contracts ending
i

Contracts that finish in the next 18 months.

Contracts ending in that window by the published end date or, where only a duration is published, an estimate from signature plus duration (marked). Neither, not counted.

An end date does not confirm a new procurement.

19 of 19 awards carry an end date, 19 estimated from the duration · not a retender forecast

Recent awards

Latest 19 of 19 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Hylobius Survey East RegionForestry and Land ScotlandNot published£30,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 3 appointed suppliers
Hylobius Survey West RegionForestry and Land ScotlandNot published£25,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 2 appointed suppliers
Hylobius Survey Central RegionForestry and Land ScotlandNot published£40,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 3 appointed suppliers
Hylobius Survey South RegionForestry and Land ScotlandNot published£40,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 2 appointed suppliers
Peatland Depth SurveyForestry and Land ScotlandNot published£600,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 4 appointed suppliers
Stocking Density Assessment (SDA) West RegionForestry and Land ScotlandNot published£90,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 4 appointed suppliers
Stocking Density Assessment (SDA) Central RegionForestry and Land ScotlandNot published£100,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 4 appointed suppliers
Stocking Density Assessment (SDA) East RegionForestry and Land ScotlandNot published£60,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 4 appointed suppliers
Stocking Density Assessment (SDA) South RegionForestry and Land ScotlandNot published£250,000 †
framework ceiling · 1 of 4 appointed suppliers
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 0 of 19 awards, estimated from the published duration on 19 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.