Dick Brothers Ltd: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
SME·Galashiels·Nationwide (UK)·Main market: Logging services
Find a Tender organisation id68354
Procedures with an award18 award records · includes panel / call-off entriesPublic authorities1named on published awardsAttributable award value£85mnet · on 8 of 8 award records · single-supplier, no ceilingsLast 12 months0no award in the last 12 months · last 22 Nov 2022Delivery regions1most often Scotland
Where they win
8 lot-level observations (8 awarded lots, 100%, plus 0 envelope awards without lot links; pending awards included) · top CPV classes
7721 Logging services7 observations · 88% · lots7730 Horticultural services1 observations · 13% · lotsAttributable award value£85mSum of published VAT-exclusive values on 8 of 8 award records — only awards to this supplier alone, framework / DPS ceilings excluded; the award’s own value, else its contract’s; the five largest make 79%. Not turnover. Largest rows below.
Typical attributable award£11m medianrobust · n=8
Award vs estimate0% at estimaterobust · n=7Median (estimate − award) / estimate on comparable contested single-supplier GBP wins, per lot, same VAT basis on both sides, scoped to CPV division 77. Negative = awarded above estimate. Historical movement, not a bid instruction.
| Largest published awards | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Region (East) | Forestry and Land Scotland | — | — | £16,412,530 † |
| South Region (West) | Forestry and Land Scotland | — | — | £15,267,470 † |
| West Region (West Argyll) | Forestry and Land Scotland | — | — | £12,983,551 † |
| East Region (South) | Forestry and Land Scotland | — | — | £12,533,333 † |
| East Region (North) | Forestry and Land Scotland | — | — | £10,026,667 † |
Where they deliver
ITL1 delivery regions on the notice · 1 of 1 awarded procedures publish one · a procedure with several regions counts in each
Scotland1 procedures · 100%
Who they sell to
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · award records explode on framework and DPS panels
Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
- Type not classified 100% (8 awards)
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forestry and Land Scotland | 1 | 100% | 8 | 22 Nov 2022 |
Share = of the 1 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Recent awards
Latest 8 of 8 award records naming this supplier
| Award / procedure | Authority | Awarded | Award value |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Region | Forestry and Land Scotland | Not published | Not published |
| East Region (North) | Forestry and Land Scotland | Not published | Not published |
| East Region (South) | Forestry and Land Scotland | Not published | Not published |
| West Region (Lochaber) | Forestry and Land Scotland | Not published | Not published |
| West Region (West Argyll) | Forestry and Land Scotland | Not published | Not published |
| Central Region | Forestry and Land Scotland | Not published | Not published |
| South Region (East) | Forestry and Land Scotland | Not published | Not published |
| South Region (West) | Forestry and Land Scotland | Not published | Not published |
Data coverage & method
- Source: Find a Tender OCDS award and contract releases. An award record is one award × this supplier; a procedure can carry many (panels, call-offs).
- Market observations are awarded lots, or one envelope award when the notice publishes no lot links. Region = delivery ITL1 on the notice, not the supplier’s registered address.
- Authority type: official OCDS UK contracting-authority type when the notice publishes one; otherwise a Tenderline name/id class; otherwise “not classified”. Purchasing hubs with no published type stay unclassified.
- Published value attributable to this supplier alone: £85m across single-supplier awards, framework / DPS ceilings excluded. Coverage is partial and the figure is not turnover, so it is not shown as a headline.
- Contract end dates: published on 0 of 8 awards; 0 end within 18 months.
- Award vs estimate tiers: robust ≥5, moderate 3–4, indicative 1–2 comparable pairs.
- Never shown: contact details, reliability or payment scores, affiliations, predicted wins.