Apollo Care Liverpool: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards

SMEBootleWest MidlandsMain market: Health services

Find a Tender organisation id16105Websiteapollocare.co.uk ↗

Procedures with an award1515 award records
i

How many tenders this supplier has won.

Tenders with at least one award to it. Award records are shown too, because one framework can carry many call-offs.

Public authorities2named on published awards
i

How many different public bodies have awarded to this supplier.

Buyers named on its awards, with duplicate names merged.

Attributable award value£59knet · on 15 of 15 award records · single-supplier, no ceilings
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

Last 12 months0no award in the last 12 months · last 21 Jan 2025
i

Awards to this supplier in the last 12 months.

Award records dated in the last 12 months, against the two years before.

Buyer regions2most often West Midlands
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

Where they win
i

In which categories this supplier wins.

Its awards by the category (CPV) of the lot won. An award to the whole procedure, with no lot named, counts once under the procedure’s main category.

15 awards (15 for a named lot, 100%, 0 for a whole procedure with no lot named; pending awards included) · top CPV classes, shares of all 15

8510 Health services15 awards · 100% · lots
Attributable award value
i

How much this supplier has won, by published values.

Sum of award values where it was the only winner, VAT excluded, framework ceilings left out.

Not turnover. Not every award publishes a value.

£59kOn 15 of 15 award records; the five largest make 68%. Largest rows below.
Typical attributable award
i

What one of this supplier’s wins is usually worth.

Middle value of the same awards as the total above.

£2k middle valuerobust · n=15
Largest published awards
i

The biggest published awards.

Awards to a single supplier with a published value, largest first, so you can check the totals against the notice.

A repeated framework total can appear here. Open the notice to check.

AuthorityAwardedTermPublished value
Fast TrackNHS Cheshire and Merseyside ICB——£13,950 †
Physical DisabilityMIDLANDS AND LANCASHIRE COMMISSIONING SUPPORT UNIT——£8,963 †
Physical DisabilityNHS Cheshire and Merseyside ICB——£6,510 †
Physical Disability - PHB notional budgetMIDLANDS AND LANCASHIRE COMMISSIONING SUPPORT UNIT——£6,041 †
Fast TrackMIDLANDS AND LANCASHIRE COMMISSIONING SUPPORT UNIT——£4,464 †

Where their buyers are
i

In which regions this supplier wins work.

The region of each buyer it won from: the buyer’s office, placed by the official ONS postcode lookup. Each procedure counts once.

Where the buyer is based, not necessarily where the work was done; the tender page shows the published place of delivery.

ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 15 of 15 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once

West Midlands13 procedures · 87%
North West England2 procedures · 13%

Who they sell to
i

Which public bodies award work to this supplier.

Authorities named on its published awards, ranked by distinct procedures, duplicate names merged.

Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier

Authority type · official UK type when published, else name/id class, else not classified · by award records (a single panel can dominate)
i

What kinds of public bodies award work to this supplier.

Its award records by the authority’s published type, otherwise by its name. One framework can add many records.

  • Type not classified87%(13 awards)
    13 of 15 awards are Type not classified (87%).
  • NHS & health13%(2 awards)
    2 of 15 awards are NHS & health (13%).
AuthorityProceduresShareAward recordsLast activity
MIDLANDS AND LANCASHIRE COMMISSIONING SUPPORT UNIT1386.7%136 Jun 2023
NHS Cheshire and Merseyside ICB213.3%221 Jan 2025

Share = of the 15 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.

Recent awards

Latest 15 of 15 award records naming this supplier

Award / procedureAuthorityAwardedPublished value
Fast Track - PHB notional budgetMIDLANDS AND LANCASHIRE COMMISSIONING SUPPORT UNITNot published£1,426 †
from the contract notice
Fast Track - PHB notional budgetMIDLANDS AND LANCASHIRE COMMISSIONING SUPPORT UNITNot published£2,046 †
from the contract notice
Fast Track - PHB notional budgetMIDLANDS AND LANCASHIRE COMMISSIONING SUPPORT UNITNot published£3,507 †
from the contract notice
Fast Track - PHB notional budgetMIDLANDS AND LANCASHIRE COMMISSIONING SUPPORT UNITNot published£792 †
from the contract notice
Fast Track - PHB notional budgetMIDLANDS AND LANCASHIRE COMMISSIONING SUPPORT UNITNot published£2,319 †
from the contract notice
About this data
  • Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. New notices arrive through the day; the figures are rebuilt nightly.
  • One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
  • Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
  • Regions on this page are where the work is delivered, not the supplier’s registered address.
  • Contract end dates. Published on 0 of 15 awards, estimated from the published duration on 0 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”.
  • Every figure shows what it rests on. Not every notice publishes a bid count, a value or a delivery region, so each figure carries the number of records behind it, and one built on few records is marked as such. The on a figure explains it; the counting rules are in the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.