121 Care Agency: UK Public Sector Contracts Won & Awards
SME·Companies House: Private Limited Company·Cleator Moor·North West England·Main market: Social work and related services
Companies House15657669 ↗ · Active
Where they wini
i
124 awards (123 for a named lot, 99%, 1 for a whole procedure with no lot named) · top CPV classes, shares of all 124 awards. An award may cover more than one class.
8530 Social work and related services123 awards · 99% · awards naming a loti
i
Largest published awards i | Authority | Awarded | Term | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18-64 (Physical Disability) | Cumberland Council | — | — | £4,330 † |
| 18-64 (Physical Disability) | Cumbria County Council | — | — | £4,073 † |
| 65+ (Physical Disability) | Cumbria County Council | — | — | £3,398 † |
| 18-64 (Physical Disability) | Cumbria County Council | — | — | £3,259 † |
| 65+ (Physical Disability) | Cumbria County Council | — | — | £2,949 † |
Where their buyers arei
i
ITL1 region of the buyer office · known for 124 of 124 awarded procedures · each procedure counts once
Who they sell toi
i
Authorities named on this supplier’s published awards · ranked by distinct procedures · a framework or DPS adds one award record per appointed supplier
i
Local authority100%(124 awards)
124 of 124 awards are Local authority (100%).
| Authority | Procedures | Share | Award records | Last activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cumbria County Council | 94 | 75.8% | 94 | 21 Mar 2023 |
| Cumberland Council | 30 | 24.2% | 30 | 28 Mar 2024 |
Share = of the 124 procedures with an award naming this supplier. Last activity = award date, or notice publication when no award date was published.
Recent awards
Latest 30 of 124 award records naming this supplier
| Award / procedure | Authority | Awarded | Published value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open Framework for the Provision of Homecare Services | Cumberland Council | Not published | Not published |
| 65+ (Physical Disability) | Cumberland Council | Not published | £1,023 † from the contract notice |
| 65+ (Physical Disability) | Cumberland Council | Not published | £999 † from the contract notice |
| 65+ (Memory) | Cumberland Council | Not published | £666 † from the contract notice |
| 18-64 (Physical Disability) | Cumberland Council | Not published | £4,330 † from the contract notice |
| 65+ (Physical Disability) | Cumberland Council | Not published | £1,999 † from the contract notice |
| 65+ (Physical Disability) | Cumberland Council | Not published | £2,474 † from the contract notice |
| 65+ (Physical Disability) | Cumberland Council | Not published | £999 † from the contract notice |
| 65+ (Physical Disability) | Cumberland Council | Not published | £2,665 † from the contract notice |
| 18-64 (Physical Disability) | Cumberland Council | Not published | £999 † from the contract notice |
About this data
- One profile per supplier. Built from award and contract notices that name this supplier; different spellings and registration numbers of the same company are merged into this profile.
- Values are published values. The table mirrors what the notice published: framework ceilings and joint awards are labelled and never counted as this supplier's money, and † marks a value taken from the contract notice when the award published none. Only awards made to this supplier alone count towards its value, excluding VAT. It is not turnover.
- Regions in the buyer chart describe the buyer office, not where the work is delivered or the supplier’s registered address.
- Contract end dates. Published on 0 of 124 awards, estimated from the published duration on 0 more (marked “estimated”); those feed “Contracts ending”. Published values in that list come from either source; Contracts Finder figures are shown as published and stay out of this profile’s money totals.
- Source. Official UK public procurement notices (Find a Tender and Contracts Finder), reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0, updated through the day and rebuilt nightly. Not every figure uses both feeds, and each one shows how many records it rests on: see the methodology. Spotted something wrong? Tell us.